Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)

2012-05-14 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2012-05-14 06:58:30 Duncan napisał(a):
 Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:
 
  On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
  
  EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
  variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
  
  You are right, of course.
 
  I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then:
  
 eclass/bsdmk.eclass
 eclass/python.eclass
 eclass/scons-utils.eclass
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild
 dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild
 gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild
 net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild
 sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild
 sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild
 
 Ouch, in eclasses too!

All matches in eclasses and some matches in ebuilds are false positives.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis



[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)

2012-05-13 Thread Duncan
Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:

 On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
 
 EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
 variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
 
 You are right, of course.

 I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then:
 
eclass/bsdmk.eclass
eclass/python.eclass
eclass/scons-utils.eclass
dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild
gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild
net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild
sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild
sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild

Ouch, in eclasses too!  Yes.  If I came across that I'd have filed bugs 
immediately, as I actually use EXTRA_* occasionally as a user, myself!  
Of course there's also the other PM users who would find these bugs.

Is someone else filing bugs, or should I?  Probably a tracker, along with 
individual bugs (only one for redis, tho)?

What about a repoman check?  Bug for that too?

(If the answer is me do it, please bump me in say 10 days or so if I 
don't.  I'm having stability problems on my main machine right now. ATA 
resets and I've already switched sata card and hard drive. Probably time 
for a new mobo/cpus/etc, but no $$ for it. =:^(  I may end up netbook-
only, severely restricting gentoo upgrades for awhile!)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman