Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2013, 14:53:19 schrieb Tomáš Chvátal: > just to be sure here "Removals are completely up to the maintainer to > decide", with expection of QA removal where the package must be > already broken to get punted. > > If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake > the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which also expects you to > take care of the bugs (QA can prune it even if you take the > maintainership but ignore failures [even if your personal feeling is > that it is corner case, it is for QA to deicde]).
I agree 100% that we should not accumulate cruft in the tree and that removals are necessary. Please however, *** write meaningful log or mask messages *** !!! "Old and uses IMake" is not really a reason for treecleaning. "Fortify crash on start and unuseable on fast machines" definitely is. Cheers, A -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
