Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: - x86/linux24 (deprecated) - x86/linux26 (deprecated) What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should we still be checking against them? I would think we would, but what do the rest of you think? -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
On Monday 01 August 2005 10:15 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: - x86/linux24 (deprecated) - x86/linux26 (deprecated) What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should we still be checking against them? I would think we would, but what do the rest of you think? speaking of which, i had an idea to clean up all that crap, i just forgot to post it a while back ... gentoo-x86/profiles/ $ tree obsolete obsolete |-- README |-- alpha | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- amd64 | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- hppa | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- ia64 | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- mips | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- ppc | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- ppc64 | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults |-- sparc | |-- deprecated | `-- make.defaults `-- x86 |-- deprecated `-- make.defaults 9 directories, 19 files then we can punt all the flat profiles and if a user needs an upgrade path, they can symlink to these in the meantime -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux, as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd. vserver/* Not true. vserver itself is not a valid profile. This is exactly why I am asking for this information. From what I can tell, only vserver/x86 is valid. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
On Jul 31, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Chris Gianelloni wrote: I especially need to know which profiles are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd. Here is the state of macos profiles: Valid: default-darwin/ - macos/10.3 - macos/10.4 - macos/progressive Deprecated: default-macos/* default-macos-10.3/ default-macos-10.4/ Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux, as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd. Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:11 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux, as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd. Standard Hardened Glibc: - amd64 (valid) - ppc (valid) - ppc64 (valid) - x86 (valid) - x86/2.6 (valid) Embedded/uClibc: - arm (valid) - arm/2.4 (valid) - arm/armeb (valid) - arm/armeb/2.4 (valid) - mips (valid) - mips/hardened (valid) - mips/mipsel (valid) - mips/mipsel/hardened (valid) - ppc (valid) - ppc/hardened (valid) - x86 (valid) - x86/2.4 (valid) - x86/hardened (valid) - x86/hardened/2.4 (valid) - x86/linux24 (deprecated) - x86/linux26 (deprecated) Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
