Re: [gentoo-dev] intel (icc,mkl...) packages looking for new maintainer

2012-05-14 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jeroen Roovers  wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:19:33 -0700
> Sébastien Fabbro  wrote:
>
>> dev-lang/icc
>> dev-lang/ifc
>
>> they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay.
>
> Do these up-to-date ebuilds fix the Macrovision bug[1]? Do we even have
> a proper workaround for the sandbox violation that doesn't involve
> disabling the sandbox?

unfortunately they do not. this bug is indeed quite annoying i have no
easy solution. this is even more annoying for x86* users with
USE=-fortran who might need to pull a fortran compiler to build lapack
as a dependency of a package, and since it depends on virtual/fortran,
dev-lang/ifc will be chosen.

-- 
sébastien



Re: [gentoo-dev] intel (icc,mkl...) packages looking for new maintainer

2012-05-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:19:33 -0700
Sébastien Fabbro  wrote:

> dev-lang/icc
> dev-lang/ifc

> they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay.

Do these up-to-date ebuilds fix the Macrovision bug[1]? Do we even have
a proper workaround for the sandbox violation that doesn't involve
disabling the sandbox?


 jer


[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332657



[gentoo-dev] intel (icc,mkl...) packages looking for new maintainer

2012-05-11 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
the following  intel packages need new maintainers:

dev-cpp/tbb
dev-lang/icc
dev-lang/ifc
dev-lang/idb
sci-libs/mkl
sci-libs/ipp

some of them are listed as me as maintainer, others as sci herd, but i
was mostly the one maintaining them.
they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay.

email me if you are interested (proxy-maintainers also welcome).

-- 
sébastien