Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64 (patch updated)
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote: > The code in question has been replaced with a sysfs tree-walker that > should find the AGP video card in any system. If anyone out there has a > PCI-Express adapter, I'd like to know if this code finds it or not. Alright, I found the regression in my own testing and on one enduser system, both nVidia. Faulty logic in the pci.ids parser, which has now been rewritten. Could the testers please update CVS, or if they are on regular rsync, wait one more hour then resync. If xchat-xsys is remerged, the code should give correct output for nVidia users as well. Thanks for testing so far :) Tony. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64
Works here without problem On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote: > Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental > patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if > the /video output gives you the right information. > If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86 > and ~amd64. > (Any other arches will most probably miss out on some CPU-related > information, tell me if at least /video works, and I'll try to get it > supported fully). > > What the patch does is getting rid of the lspci dependency. Upstream > reports that it can cause stale processes that will not disappear until > X-Chat is closed. > The code in question has been replaced with a sysfs tree-walker that > should find the AGP video card in any system. If anyone out there has a > PCI-Express adapter, I'd like to know if this code finds it or not. > > Thanks, > Tony (Chainsaw). -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] x86 Security Liaison signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote: > Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental > patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if > the /video output gives you the right information. > If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86 > and ~amd64. Works ok here.. cpu[1 x AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ @ 798MHz w/ 1024 KB L2 Cache] [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux 2.6.11-gentoo-r3 x86_64] snd_card[0: ICH - SiS SI7012] uname[Linux laptop 2.6.11-gentoo-r3 #1 Sun Apr 3 21:39:47 CDT 2005 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux] vid_card[ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] @ 1280x800x24bpp] -- Homer Parker Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] net-irc/xchat-xsys: Test request for ~x86 & ~amd64
Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if the /video output gives you the right information. If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86 and ~amd64. (Any other arches will most probably miss out on some CPU-related information, tell me if at least /video works, and I'll try to get it supported fully). What the patch does is getting rid of the lspci dependency. Upstream reports that it can cause stale processes that will not disappear until X-Chat is closed. The code in question has been replaced with a sysfs tree-walker that should find the AGP video card in any system. If anyone out there has a PCI-Express adapter, I'd like to know if this code finds it or not. Thanks, Tony (Chainsaw). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
