Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 10:01 +0200, Rémi Cardona a écrit :
 The Gnome Team has 3 herds : gnome, gnome-mm and gnome-office. While 
 officially we (us gnomies) are all maintainers of all 3 herds, having 3 
 herds makes for better housekeeping.
 
you forgot gnome-accessibility :p

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée


Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-05 Thread Rémi Cardona

Robin H. Johnson wrote:

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:

One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
 http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html

1. With the addition ofmaintainerteamcpp/team/maintainer, why
do we still needherd  elements?


The Gnome Team has 3 herds : gnome, gnome-mm and gnome-office. While 
officially we (us gnomies) are all maintainers of all 3 herds, having 3 
herds makes for better housekeeping.


And who knows, we could add one or two more herds once this GLEP is 
approved.


Cheers,

Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-04 Thread Luca Barbato

Tiziano Müller wrote:

What do you think of them?


Both seem good, I'm looking forward to see them completed =)

lu

--

Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-04 Thread Rémi Cardona

Tiziano Müller wrote:

What do you think of them?


+1 on the first GLEP.

The second GLEP seems like a much better way of doing things, so +1 as 
well, but I am no xml expert :)


Cheers,

Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
 And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
 http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer  Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpwgwF1vjSjK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
 One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
 http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
1. With the addition of maintainerteamcpp/team/maintainer, why
do we still need herd elements?

2. gentoo:devdev-zero/gentoo:dev. That's not possible to validate
sanely. The following would be better:
maintainerdev project=foobarmoodev/dev/maintainer

With the default value of the 'project' attribute being 'gentoo'.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer  Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpribKEvUgIK.pgp
Description: PGP signature