Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 15:23 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not known. Thanks - I'll keep that in mind. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
On Monday 16 May 2005 15:04, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not allowed by portage. in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not known. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net pgpJx3HZxt37N.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:27, Marius Mauch wrote: Well, it's valid with portage-2.1, but not 2.0. Concerning that, how far are we from it being testable by the general developer population? Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net pgpUaDXjWhOxK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 15:04 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not allowed by portage. I meant to write 'orinoco-0.15_rc3_pre20050516.ebuild' of course. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming scheme confusion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not allowed by portage. I can't go with just orinoco-0.15_pre20050516.ebuild as _rcX is considered newer than _preY. How about rc2_p20050516? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiOp3XVaO67S1rtsRAok8AKD3dkxsKsP+zr4F72UgRcEkGzvhYwCfVwB0 KxOD3PruBa+zU5McrlWD5F8= =7q8G -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list