-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/06/12 07:58 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
9'ish consumers. I propose Enable support for the PostScript
language
Perhaps ps or postscript instead of the implementation-centric
gs ?
//Peter
I think based on the consumers described we should keep the flag as
'gs' as this is primarily for ghostscript-based support and not
generic postscript capability.
That said, there's only nine of them, and as I can't see that many
more packages suddenly including support for ghostscript I don't see
that much of a need in making this flag be global...?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAk/bOAYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC9OwD/W0ofi+chYYZ+k5ABo+VfODHs
F/83jl30ru+iOakp/nkA/Rg+8H6wrNyR/1BAe78T2UfhgMEtGOQy16TA+UrmPrO6
=YpRu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
