Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A seemingly bug found when emerging @preserved-rebuild
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800 Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a bug? or did I miss something here? Thanks for your time! The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it should be able to deal with resulting breakages on their own Marius -- gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A seemingly bug found when emerging @preserved-rebuild
On 21:05 Tue 01 Jul , Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800 Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a bug? or did I miss something here? Thanks for your time! The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it should be able to deal with resulting breakages on their own Marius, thanks for this info and sorry for the noise. Maybe I should ask vapier the purpose of multislot. Zhang Le -- gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A seemingly bug found when emerging @preserved-rebuild
On 21:05 Tue 01 Jul , Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800 Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this a bug? or did I miss something here? Thanks for your time! The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it should be able to deal with resulting breakages on their own Sorry, forget to mention: I solved this by manually modifying /var/db/pkg/sys-devel/gcc-x.y.z/SLOT directly. Hope this would be useful to others. Zhang Le -- gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] A seemingly bug found when emerging @preserved-rebuild
On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800 Is this a bug? or did I miss something here? Thanks for your time! The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. not really. the SLOT syntax should be sufficiently flexible, but seeing as it isnt, the result is hacks to work around a limited system. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
