Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Objections to renaming pym directory to lib?
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu śro, 18.07.2018 o godzinie 13∶51 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner > napisał: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:28:05 -0700 > > > Zac Medico wrote: > > > > > > > Are there any objections to renaming the pym directory to lib [1]? > > > > Note that the git log --follow option makes this kind of rename > > > > fairly painless. > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/343 > > > > > > is fine with me > > > > > > > Are we leaving symlinks; or we think (non-portage) tools won't need to > care > > about this name change? > > > > It affects only the source tree; it doesn't affect installed Portage. > Ah, then go for it ;) > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny >
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Objections to renaming pym directory to lib?
W dniu śro, 18.07.2018 o godzinie 13∶51 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner napisał: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:28:05 -0700 > > Zac Medico wrote: > > > > > Are there any objections to renaming the pym directory to lib [1]? > > > Note that the git log --follow option makes this kind of rename > > > fairly painless. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/343 > > > > is fine with me > > > > Are we leaving symlinks; or we think (non-portage) tools won't need to care > about this name change? > It affects only the source tree; it doesn't affect installed Portage. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Objections to renaming pym directory to lib?
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:28:05 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > > > Are there any objections to renaming the pym directory to lib [1]? > > Note that the git log --follow option makes this kind of rename > > fairly painless. > > > > [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/343 > > is fine with me > Are we leaving symlinks; or we think (non-portage) tools won't need to care about this name change? -A
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Objections to renaming pym directory to lib?
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:28:05 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > Are there any objections to renaming the pym directory to lib [1]? > Note that the git log --follow option makes this kind of rename > fairly painless. > > [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/343 is fine with me pgpewJwnz8KUC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-portage-dev] Objections to renaming pym directory to lib?
Are there any objections to renaming the pym directory to lib [1]? Note that the git log --follow option makes this kind of rename fairly painless. [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/343 -- Thanks, Zac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
