Re: [gentoo-user] AMD64 and xfs-sources

2003-11-12 Thread KamaolaKid
Thanks!

development-sources worked great.

-- Kyle S.

- Original Message - 
From: "Donnie Berkholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AMD64 and xfs-sources



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AMD64 and xfs-sources

2003-11-12 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 12:35, KamaolaKid wrote:
> I'm installing from the latest amd64 live cd and I'm using XFS for my
> root file system.  When I emerge -k sys-kernel/xfs-sources it complains
> about the package being masked.  It appears that all the kernel sources
> are masked, and they are all 2.4 kernels.  I was under the impression
> that the live cd itself was using the 2.6 xfs sources.  Is this correct?
> If so, how can I get my hands on the 2.6 xfs sources?

I believe development-sources has XFS. Other than that, only
gentoo-test-sources, gentoo-dev-sources, vanilla-sources and
vanilla-prepatch-sources are proved working on amd64.

You may be interested in gentoo-dev-sources, which are 2.6 sources with
a Gentoo patchset. That's all I know about them.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-user] AMD64 and xfs-sources

2003-11-12 Thread KamaolaKid
I'm installing from the latest amd64 live cd and I'm using XFS for my
root file system.  When I emerge -k sys-kernel/xfs-sources it complains
about the package being masked.  It appears that all the kernel sources
are masked, and they are all 2.4 kernels.  I was under the impression
that the live cd itself was using the 2.6 xfs sources.  Is this correct?
If so, how can I get my hands on the 2.6 xfs sources?

-- Kyle S.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list