Re: [gentoo-user] Hard drive problems

2005-02-21 Thread Leif B. Kristensen
On Monday 21 February 2005 09:45, Colin wrote:
> Does Linux just report the drive size differently (mebibyte vs.
> megabyte?) or has this hard drive sought its last sector?

Reported drive sizes may vary considerably depending on what file system 
you're using.

>From the size of your partitions, it would appear that the disk has less 
than one gigabyte total. What's that -- vintage '96? While it certainly 
may be a educating experience to watch as an old disk arrives at its 
final death throes, it's usually only a waste of time.
-- 
Leif Biberg Kristensen

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Hard drive problems

2005-02-21 Thread Frank Schafer
Hi,

I have had very similiar errors caused by a corrupted (older) IDE
cable. 

Just a tought.

Frank

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 03:45 -0500, Colin wrote:
> I was having problems untarring the portage tree from the CD, so now I'm 
> running "fsck -pvcf /dev/hda3" right now, and it's giving me a million 
> errors like this:
> hda: task_in_intr:  status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest 
> Error }
> hda: task_in_intr:  error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=[number], 
> sector=[another number]
> ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> end_request: I/O error, dev hda, sector [number]
> 
> Partitions:
> /dev/hda1  (32 MB)Start: 1  End: 63Blocks: 
> 31270+ Id: 83 (Linux, ext3)
> /dev/hda2  (96 MB)Start: 64End: 250  Blocks: 94248   
> Id: 82 (Linux swap, but I forgot to turn it on ^_^U)
> /dev/hda3  (rest of disk)  Start: 251   End: 1416   Blocks: 587664   
>   Id: 83 (Linux, ReiserFS)
> fdisk reports this drive as 730 MB, 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1416 
> cylinders (and spits a warning about having more than 1024 cylinders).  
> DOS/Windows always reported the drive as 695 MB, though.  
> Coincidentally, all of the bad sectors are near the end of the disk, so 
> I'm thinking that the disk is being reported to the kernel as larger 
> than it actually is, which explains why all these operations are failing.
> 
> Does Linux just report the drive size differently (mebibyte vs. 
> megabyte?) or has this hard drive sought its last sector?
> 
> --
> Colin
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
-- 
Frank Schafer
System specialist
T-Systems Czech s.r.o.
Kloboučnická 1435/24, 140 00 Praha 4
Tel.: +420 296529522
Fax: +420 296529129
Mobil: +420 605 202 419
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.cz



--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Hard drive problems

2005-02-21 Thread Colin
I was having problems untarring the portage tree from the CD, so now I'm 
running "fsck -pvcf /dev/hda3" right now, and it's giving me a million 
errors like this:

hda: task_in_intr:  status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest 
Error }
hda: task_in_intr:  error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=[number], 
sector=[another number]
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
end_request: I/O error, dev hda, sector [number]

Partitions:
/dev/hda1  (32 MB)Start: 1  End: 63Blocks: 
31270+ Id: 83 (Linux, ext3)
/dev/hda2  (96 MB)Start: 64End: 250  Blocks: 94248   
   Id: 82 (Linux swap, but I forgot to turn it on ^_^U)
/dev/hda3  (rest of disk)  Start: 251   End: 1416   Blocks: 587664   
 Id: 83 (Linux, ReiserFS)
fdisk reports this drive as 730 MB, 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1416 
cylinders (and spits a warning about having more than 1024 cylinders).  
DOS/Windows always reported the drive as 695 MB, though.  
Coincidentally, all of the bad sectors are near the end of the disk, so 
I'm thinking that the disk is being reported to the kernel as larger 
than it actually is, which explains why all these operations are failing.

Does Linux just report the drive size differently (mebibyte vs. 
megabyte?) or has this hard drive sought its last sector?

--
Colin
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list