[gentoo-user] Safe kernel versions?

2004-01-17 Thread Richard Revis 
With all the local root bugs floating around recently, does anyone have a
list of safe gentoo-sources versions to use? (Ie 2.4.22+ and 2.6.1+?)

-- 
This line intentionally left blank.
22:12:43 up 3 days, 10:01,  2 users,  load average: 0.15, 0.11, 0.07
RX bytes:1308556205 (1247.9 Mb)  TX bytes:98417942 (93.8 Mb)
E-mail address munged to prevent spam.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe kernel versions?

2004-01-17 Thread Collins Richey 
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:13:59 +
Richard Revis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 With all the local root bugs floating around recently, does anyone have a
 list of safe gentoo-sources versions to use? (Ie 2.4.22+ and 2.6.1+?)
 

Yeah, development-sources-2.6.1_rc2.ebuild.  I note that there is now also 
development-sources-2.6.1_rc3.ebuild, but I haven't tried it.

BTW, I've been running 2.5/2.6 since late 2.5.x days (at least 6 months) without any 
problems.  Unless you have unusual hardware or software, this is a shoo-in if you are 
current on gentoo stable.

-- 
Collins - Denver Area - Gentoo stable kernel 2.6.1-mm2
[ M$ ] A customer is only a cash-delivery vehicle and a partner 
is only a potential target to be acquired, destroyed or slowed at 
all costs. -OrangeCrate.com, Novell: Quiet Warriors, Jan 17, 2004

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe kernel versions?

2004-01-17 Thread Simon Prosser 
On Sunday 18 January 2004 01:50, Collins Richey wrote:
 I note that there is now also development-sources-2.6.1_rc3.ebuild, but I
 haven't tried it
Seems to be stable for me...
-- 
Linux localhost 2.6.1-rc3-gentoo #2 Sun Jan 18 01:30:11 GMT 2004 i686 AMD 
Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list