[gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
root # emerge info Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) = System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu x/distributions/gentoo" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share /config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/3.1/share/config /usr/share/config" . . . USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode foomaticdb gif jpeg libg++ mad mikm od mmx motif mpeg ncurses nls pdflib png quicktime spell truetype xml2 xmms xv z lib gdbm berkdb slang readline arts svga java sdl gpm tcpd pam libwww ssl perl p ython imlib oggvorbis opengl mozilla cdr Firebird joystick apache2 flash tcltk s nmp imap mcal ldap tetex gtk2 X dvb dga bonobo gtk gnome nas postgress mysql odb c esd alsa tiff dvd faad aalib fbcon cjk doc sse xml radeon -kde -qt" COMPILER="gcc3" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" . . . ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" MAKEOPTS="-j2" AUTOCLEAN="yes" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" FEATURES="sandbox ccache" see ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" but # emerge -p net-p2p/xmule These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been masked. !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. Am I missing something? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:34, Robert Young wrote: > root # emerge info > Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) > = > System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu > http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu > x/distributions/gentoo" . > . > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > AUTOCLEAN="yes" > SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" > FEATURES="sandbox ccache" > > see > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" Change to "~x86" only > > but > > # emerge -p net-p2p/xmule > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been masked. > > !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. > > Am I missing something? > -- Tom Wesley pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:34, Robert Young wrote: > # emerge -p net-p2p/xmule > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been masked. > > !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. > > Am I missing something? > I have gotten that a few time my self lately. The fastest way around it for me was to just 'emerge full_path_to_ebuild/file.ebuild' It would build then. I have noticed that there was a new portage update the other night, while doing an 'emerge sync'. I wonder if that could be the problem? Jayson Garrell -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
The only problem was the security holes. Thanks for all the quick responses. In a perfect world should emerge not have reported Calculating dependencies !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been HARD masked. please see package.mask !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. This would have saved me and others some time. Should I request an enhancement for this? Mike Williams wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:37, Tom Wesley wrote: > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > > > Change to "~x86" only > > Yup, no need for the x86 as well. > > The other problem is: > > legolas root # grep -B2 -A1 xmule /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Aug 2003) > # security holes ! > <=net-p2p/xmule-1.4.3 > > - -- > # <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18 July 2003) > # package is obsolete and unsupported > # use net-p2p/xmule instead > net-p2p/lmule > > Oddly the only versions in portage are masked because of security holes... > Just comment out the xmule line and you'll be set to go. Remember, any sync > you do will revert your changes. > > - -- > Mike Williams > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/S8cLInuLMrk7bIwRAln0AJ45Xg6HqoR57Z4WvKShVU2BxERT4gCgjEw7 > 9Cmr7fq8agNdOW2kRoS/Srk= > =XvIB > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:37, Tom Wesley wrote: > On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:34, Robert Young wrote: > > root # emerge info > > Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) > > = > > System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) > > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu > > http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu > > x/distributions/gentoo" > > . > > > . > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > > AUTOCLEAN="yes" > > SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" > > FEATURES="sandbox ccache" > > > > see > > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > Change to "~x86" only > My make.conf only has "~x86" not both, and I still get that error. Is there a global setting some where? Jayson Garrell -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:37, Tom Wesley wrote: > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > Change to "~x86" only Yup, no need for the x86 as well. The other problem is: legolas root # grep -B2 -A1 xmule /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask # [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Aug 2003) # security holes ! <=net-p2p/xmule-1.4.3 - -- # <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18 July 2003) # package is obsolete and unsupported # use net-p2p/xmule instead net-p2p/lmule Oddly the only versions in portage are masked because of security holes... Just comment out the xmule line and you'll be set to go. Remember, any sync you do will revert your changes. - -- Mike Williams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/S8cLInuLMrk7bIwRAln0AJ45Xg6HqoR57Z4WvKShVU2BxERT4gCgjEw7 9Cmr7fq8agNdOW2kRoS/Srk= =XvIB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
> My make.conf only has "~x86" not both, and I still get that error. Is > there a global setting some where? Have a look at /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask This file specifies which packages and version of the same that are hard-masked, meaning that the ~x86 won't be enough to emerge them. It's no use trying to change anything in it since it gets replaces as soon as you run 'emerge sync'. Patrick Börjesson -- Public key id: 4C5AB0BF Public key available at search.keyserver.net[:11371] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 22:12, Heschi Kreinick wrote: > The people telling you that ACCEPT_KEYWORDS should be just ~x86 are wrong. > Had they bothered to look on their own systems they'd see that they have > both also (assuming they run unstable). If you had only ~x86, you wouldn't > be able to install stable packages. Settings in make.conf are cumulative to > settings in make.globals and the make.profile files. > Oh, and wrt your original question, it's hardmasked in package.mask just > like people have been telling you. If you emerge the ebuild manually it'll > at least try to install, but you should probably find out why it was > hardmasked first. > -Heschi And we bow to your supremity :-) He is of course correct > > > but . . but > > from my > > make.conf i have > > > > .. > > . > > . > > # '~ppc', '~sparc' are the unstable KEYWORDS for their respective > > platforms. > > > # DO NOT PUT ANYTHING BUT YOUR SPECIFIC ~ARCHITECTURE IN THE LIST. > > # IF YOU ARE UNSURE OF YOUR ARCH, OR THE IMPLICATIONS, DO NOT MODIFY > > THIS. # > > #ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" > > > > # Portage Directories > > # === > > # > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Tom Wesley pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:43, Jayson Garrell wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:37, Tom Wesley wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:34, Robert Young wrote: > > > root # emerge info > > > Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) > > > = > > > System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) > > > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu > > > http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu > > > x/distributions/gentoo" > > > > . > > > > > . > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > > > AUTOCLEAN="yes" > > > SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" > > > FEATURES="sandbox ccache" > > > > > > see > > > > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > > > Change to "~x86" only > > My make.conf only has "~x86" not both, and I still get that error. Is > there a global setting some where? > > Jayson Garrell > Line 117 of package.mask -- Tom Wesley pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
but . . but from my make.conf i have .. . . # '~ppc', '~sparc' are the unstable KEYWORDS for their respective platforms. # DO NOT PUT ANYTHING BUT YOUR SPECIFIC ~ARCHITECTURE IN THE LIST. # IF YOU ARE UNSURE OF YOUR ARCH, OR THE IMPLICATIONS, DO NOT MODIFY THIS. # #ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" # Portage Directories # === # and # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge info gives me Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) = System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu . . . PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode foomaticdb gif jpeg libg++ mad mikm od mmx motif mpeg ncurses nls pdflib png quicktime spell truetype xml2 xmms xv z lib gdbm berkdb slang readline arts svga java sdl gpm tcpd pam libwww ssl perl p ython imlib oggvorbis opengl mozilla cdr Firebird joystick apache2 flash tcltk s nmp imap mcal ldap tetex gtk2 X dvb dga bonobo gtk gnome nas postgress mysql odb c esd alsa tiff dvd faad aalib fbcon cjk doc sse xml radeon -kde -qt" ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" MAKEOPTS="-j2" AUTOCLEAN="yes" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" FEATURES="sandbox ccache" Tom Wesley wrote: > On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:34, Robert Young wrote: > > root # emerge info > > Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1) > > = > > System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686 Celeron (Coppermine) > > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu > > http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linu > > x/distributions/gentoo" > > . > > > . > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > > AUTOCLEAN="yes" > > SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" > > FEATURES="sandbox ccache" > > > > see > > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" > > Change to "~x86" only > > > > > but > > > > # emerge -p net-p2p/xmule > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies > > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been masked. > > > > !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > -- > Tom Wesley > > > >Part 1.2 Type: application/pgp-signature >Description: signature -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 26 August 2003 22:14, Robert Young wrote: > The only problem was the security holes. > > Thanks for all the quick responses. > > In a perfect world should emerge not have reported > > Calculating dependencies > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been HARD masked. > please see package.mask > > !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. > > > This would have saved me and others some time. Should I request an > enhancement for this? Can't hurt. My feeling is tho it won't get done. Things in package.mask are there for a reason, quite often because they are broken, break other packages, or do other nasty or untested things. You could then argue that they should be in portage in the first place, but they need testing by people with the knowledge and experience to test and/or recover from a nasty mess. - -- Mike Williams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/S9GUInuLMrk7bIwRAhbaAKCWlKhkbQi0f/+WMAENoAx7wZgnIQCfQmpN p6VuL7MtDtFO0Xm8F2lse74= =EOdK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
has the bug been logged? Jayson Garrell wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:34, Robert Young wrote: > > # emerge -p net-p2p/xmule > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies > > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "net-p2p/xmule" have been masked. > > > > !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct. > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > I have gotten that a few time my self lately. The fastest way around it > for me was to just 'emerge full_path_to_ebuild/file.ebuild' It would > build then. I have noticed that there was a new portage update the other > night, while doing an 'emerge sync'. I wonder if that could be the > problem? > > Jayson Garrell > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge mask issue: I checked emerge info
The people telling you that ACCEPT_KEYWORDS should be just ~x86 are wrong. Had they bothered to look on their own systems they'd see that they have both also (assuming they run unstable). If you had only ~x86, you wouldn't be able to install stable packages. Settings in make.conf are cumulative to settings in make.globals and the make.profile files. Oh, and wrt your original question, it's hardmasked in package.mask just like people have been telling you. If you emerge the ebuild manually it'll at least try to install, but you should probably find out why it was hardmasked first. -Heschi > but . . but > from my > make.conf i have > > .. > . > . > # '~ppc', '~sparc' are the unstable KEYWORDS for their respective platforms. > # DO NOT PUT ANYTHING BUT YOUR SPECIFIC ~ARCHITECTURE IN THE LIST. > # IF YOU ARE UNSURE OF YOUR ARCH, OR THE IMPLICATIONS, DO NOT MODIFY THIS. > # > #ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" > > # Portage Directories > # === > # -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
