Re: [gentoo-user] ls -l shortcut ll

2003-06-06 Thread brett holcomb
Try alias ll=ls -l.  I thought this was defined in 
Gentoo already in /etc/skel in one of the .bash files.  Of 
course if the user doesn't have these files in his home 
they won't take effect.

On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:47:34 +1000
 blade- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,

In mandrake and other distros? typing ll will produce the 
same as ls -l
same as l is ls, that was easy by doing ln -s /bin/ls 
/bin/l
but I cant work out how to to ls -l

I know its lazy but I became accustomed to it.

Regards



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] ls -l shortcut ll

2003-06-06 Thread blade-
Yes it is already defined in there, it doesnt seem to work for root by 
default.

brett holcomb wrote:

Try alias ll=ls -l.  I thought this was defined in Gentoo already in 
/etc/skel in one of the .bash files.  Of course if the user doesn't 
have these files in his home they won't take effect.

On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:47:34 +1000
 blade- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,

In mandrake and other distros? typing ll will produce the same as ls -l
same as l is ls, that was easy by doing ln -s /bin/ls /bin/l
but I cant work out how to to ls -l
I know its lazy but I became accustomed to it.

Regards



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] ls -l shortcut ll

2003-06-06 Thread brett holcomb
Copy the files in /etc/skel (.bashrc and .bash_profile) to 
/root.  They aren't there by default (and aren't for other 
users unless you use the -m option for adduser).

On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 08:07:02 +1000
 blade- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is already defined in there, it doesnt seem to 
work for root by default.

brett holcomb wrote:

Try alias ll=ls -l.  I thought this was defined in 
Gentoo already in 
/etc/skel in one of the .bash files.  Of course if the 
user doesn't 
have these files in his home they won't take effect.

On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:47:34 +1000
blade- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,

In mandrake and other distros? typing ll will produce the 
same as ls -l
same as l is ls, that was easy by doing ln -s /bin/ls 
/bin/l
but I cant work out how to to ls -l

I know its lazy but I became accustomed to it.

Regards



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] ls -l shortcut ll

2003-06-05 Thread blade-
Hi all,

In mandrake and other distros? typing ll will produce the same as ls -l
same as l is ls, that was easy by doing ln -s /bin/ls /bin/l
but I cant work out how to to ls -l
I know its lazy but I became accustomed to it.

Regards



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] ls -l shortcut ll

2003-06-05 Thread Pat Kerwan


On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:47:34PM +1000, blade- wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 In mandrake and other distros? typing ll will produce the same as ls -l
 same as l is ls, that was easy by doing ln -s /bin/ls /bin/l
 but I cant work out how to to ls -l
 
 I know its lazy but I became accustomed to it.
 

Add the following to your .bashrc file:

alias ll=ls -l

- PK

 
 Regards
 
 
 
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list