Re: [gentoo-user] problem with portage and alsa-lib

2004-01-04 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 01:09, Glenn Johnson wrote:
 I am maintaining an ~x86 system and have alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2 installed.
 When doing an 'emerge -Dup world', portage wants to downgrade
 alsa-lib to 0.9.8.  What is strange is that it seems that alsa-lib
 itself is causing this.  I did an 'emerge -C alsa-lib' to remove
 alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2.  Then upon doing 'emerge -Dup world' I get the
 following:
 
 ===begin output===
 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
 
 Calculating world dependencies ...done!
 [ebuild  N] media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2  
 ===end output===
 
 So then I do 'emerge alsa-lib', which installs alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2
 
 Then, after the installation of alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2, I do the 'emerge
 -Dup world' again and get the following:
 
 ===begin output===
 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
 
 Calculating world dependencies ...done!
 [ebuild UD] media-libs/alsa-lib-0.9.8 [1.0.0_rc2] 
 ===end output===
 
Are you using the -U (capital U) switch?  which says, ONLY do UPGRADES
(no downgrades).  Hence:

emerge -pvUun world
emerge -Uun

It never wants to down grade a package I have emerged with
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86'.




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] problem with portage and alsa-lib

2004-01-04 Thread Glenn Johnson
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 02:16:36AM -0500, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:

 On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 01:09, Glenn Johnson wrote:

  I am maintaining an ~x86 system and have alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2
  installed.  When doing an 'emerge -Dup world', portage wants to
  downgrade alsa-lib to 0.9.8.  What is strange is that it seems that
  alsa-lib itself is causing this.  I did an 'emerge -C alsa-lib' to
  remove alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2.  Then upon doing 'emerge -Dup world' I
  get the following:
  
  ===begin output===
  These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
  
  Calculating world dependencies ...done!
  [ebuild  N] media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2  
  ===end output===
  
  So then I do 'emerge alsa-lib', which installs alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2
  
  Then, after the installation of alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2, I do the 'emerge
  -Dup world' again and get the following:
  
  ===begin output===
  These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
  
  Calculating world dependencies ...done!
  [ebuild UD] media-libs/alsa-lib-0.9.8 [1.0.0_rc2] 
  ===end output===
  
 Are you using the -U (capital U) switch? which says, ONLY do UPGRADES
 (no downgrades).  Hence:

   emerge -pvUun world
   emerge -Uun
 
 It never wants to down grade a package I have emerged with
 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86'.

I tried it with that as well (meant to mention that in the original
e-mail), and oddly enough it gives the same result:

===begin output===
 --upgradeonly implies --update... adding --update to options.

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild UD] media-libs/alsa-lib-0.9.8 [1.0.0_rc2] 
===end output===

-- 
Glenn Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] problem with portage and alsa-lib

2004-01-03 Thread Glenn Johnson
I am maintaining an ~x86 system and have alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2 installed.
When doing an 'emerge -Dup world', portage wants to downgrade
alsa-lib to 0.9.8.  What is strange is that it seems that alsa-lib
itself is causing this.  I did an 'emerge -C alsa-lib' to remove
alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2.  Then upon doing 'emerge -Dup world' I get the
following:

===begin output===
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N] media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2  
===end output===

So then I do 'emerge alsa-lib', which installs alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2

Then, after the installation of alsa-lib-1.0.0_rc2, I do the 'emerge
-Dup world' again and get the following:

===begin output===
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild UD] media-libs/alsa-lib-0.9.8 [1.0.0_rc2] 
===end output===

Does anyone have an idea of what might be wrong?

Thanks.

-- 
Glenn Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list