[gentoo-user] subversion + apache2 = emerge madnes?
Yesterday I emerged subversion with USE='apache-2' emerge subversion today after a regular emerge --sync ; emerge -auD world I got myself in an interesting situation: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # emerge -auD world These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating world dependencies ...done! [blocks B ] =net-www/apache-2* (from pkg dev-util/subversion-1.1.3) !!! Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be installed !!!on the same system. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # equery list apache [ Searching for package 'apache' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [ ] net-www/apache-2.0.52-r2 (2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # equery list subversion [ Searching for package 'subversion' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [ ] dev-util/subversion-1.1.3 (0) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # equery uses subversion [ Searching for packages matching subversion... ] [ Colour Code : set unset ] [ Legend: Left column (U) - USE flags from make.conf ] [ : Right column (I) - USE flags packages was installed with ] [ Found these USE variables for dev-util/subversion-1.1.3 ] U I + + ssl : Adds support for Secure Socket Layer connections - + apache2 : Chooses Apache2 support when a package supports both Apache1 and Apache2 + + berkdb : Adds support for sys-libs/db (Berkeley DB for MySQL) + + python : Adds support/bindings for the Python language - - emacs : Adds support for GNU Emacs + + perl: Adds support/bindings for the Perl language. + + java: Adds support for Java - - bash-completion : Enable bash-completion support [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # any way out of this? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion + apache2 = emerge madnes?
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:47:18 +0200 Stoian Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Yesterday I emerged subversion with USE='apache-2' emerge subversion First, use package.use, not USE on the commandline. Second, you probably want apache2, not apache-2. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgp9XcmUDuA20.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.
tumbleweed portage # emerge =sys-devel/autoconf-2.58 it looks like it did it tumbleweed portage # emerge -p subversion These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] dev-lang/swig-1.3.19 [blocks B ] =sys-devel/autoconf-2.58* (from pkg dev-util/subversion-0.35.1) [ebuild N] dev-util/subversion-0.35.1 It seems that I'm still blocked even after I emerged the correct version. Any ideas? --Kurt -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.
It is autoconf-2.58* that is blocked. You need to install a different version of autoconf. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion emerge blocked.
Right. Call my grasshopper. Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: It is autoconf-2.58* that is blocked. You need to install a different version of autoconf. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:43, Andrew Cowie wrote: On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 03:09, Kurt Guenther wrote: I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? You'd do well to pop into #svn on freenode and lurk and listen for a while. From them, for example, I found out don't use 0.28! Horrible bugs! and was offered advice of what version to go to. I happen to be running 0.29.0 and have been for a while; I know they have moved on considerably from then. I've been using subversion for a long time. It used to be that the subversion ebuild in gentoo was terrible and unusable, but this has not been the case for a long time. I've been using subversion both as a client and a server (using apache2) on gentoo with no problems for quite a while. Subversion development has been moving very quickly Each release is considerably more stable than the last one. It wouldn't surprise me if the ebuild stayed masked until subversion proceeds into the beta phase of its development, but I've been using it for ALL my version control needs for well over a year now. As long as you pay careful attention to the changelogs when you upgrade (in case you need to dump / reload your repositories) you shouldn't have much in the way of problems. Tom -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Subversion masked
I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? --Kurt -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:39:12 -0500 Kurt Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does | anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? It's marked as ~x86, which means it's not been heavily tested. If you've done lots of testing, you might consider filing a bug (assign to pauldv at gentoo.org for this package) asking whether a version could be moved to stable at some point. As a sidenote, if you'd like to see *why* a package is masked, take a look at the patch in bug 16907. Warning: I'm gonna keep plugging that bug until it's integrated into portage :) -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail:ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion masked
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 03:09, Kurt Guenther wrote: I see that there is an ebuild for subversion, but it is masked. Does anybody know what is up here? How do I find out status, etc? You'd do well to pop into #svn on freenode and lurk and listen for a while. From them, for example, I found out don't use 0.28! Horrible bugs! and was offered advice of what version to go to. I happen to be running 0.29.0 and have been for a while; I know they have moved on considerably from then. AfC Adelaide -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] subversion
Today I upgrade subversion from 0.27.0 to 0.28.0 and get this kind of version error. Other operations give the same result. The db4_recover or svnadmin recover doesn't help. Ideas? TIA Alcino svn commit svn: Unsupported repository version svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: OPTIONS request failed on '/svn/repos/bin' svn: Expected version '2' of repository; found version '1' svn: Your commit message was left in a temporary file: svn:'/home/alcino/bin/svn-commit.tmp' -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] subversion
Forget that never mind... :( After a successful (or at least an apparently success) commit, I get this: svn log svn: Berkeley DB error svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/repos/bin' svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /home/svn/repos/db: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery and db4_recover, directly or via su apache makes no difference. I think that subversion was easy than cvs... :( TIA4AH Alcino -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 September 2003 21:55, Alcino Dall Igna Junior wrote: Forget that never mind... :( After a successful (or at least an apparently success) commit, I get this: svn log svn: Berkeley DB error svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/repos/bin' svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /home/svn/repos/db: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery and db4_recover, directly or via su apache makes no difference. I think that subversion was easy than cvs... :( Did you create a totally fresh repository? - -- Mike Williams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VQS7InuLMrk7bIwRAtCaAJ0TQwu3+T2w7uz4WFpt1b5PEBoP9gCdFHa9 IAOFC3K+x6ryEDR3raTErbc= =kElx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion
Yes, I delete the old and recreate a new repository, but I think that should have a better way to do this. In a fast scan in subversion site I find nothing. As far as I can see, I will downgrade and wait. T. Alcino On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:59, Mike Williams wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 September 2003 21:55, Alcino Dall Igna Junior wrote: Forget that never mind... :( After a successful (or at least an apparently success) commit, I get this: svn log svn: Berkeley DB error svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/repos/bin' svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /home/svn/repos/db: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery and db4_recover, directly or via su apache makes no difference. I think that subversion was easy than cvs... :( Did you create a totally fresh repository? - -- Mike Williams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/VQS7InuLMrk7bIwRAtCaAJ0TQwu3+T2w7uz4WFpt1b5PEBoP9gCdFHa9 IAOFC3K+x6ryEDR3raTErbc= =kElx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] subversion
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:43, Alcino Dall Igna Junior wrote: Today I upgrade subversion from 0.27.0 to 0.28.0 and get this kind of version error. Other operations give the same result. The db4_recover or svnadmin recover doesn't help. Ideas? Hi, At issue is that the 0.28.0 release of subversion change the database schema. Because of this repositories created with subversion 0.28.0 will cause problems with 0.28.0. This document from the subversion trunk: http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/repos_upgrade_HOWTO provides the upgrade proceedure. You can find more information in the CHANGES file from the release. Let me know if you have any questions. -- Steven Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM : skkataim and tho' We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,-- One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -- Ulysses by Alfred Lord Tennyson --- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Subversion Ebuild
Hey all, Is there anyone out there who uses the new subversion ebuilds in portage? I've used subversion heavily since November, but I never used the gentoo-provided ebuilds because they were so out of date, and Berkeley 4.0.14 seemed to do weird stuff whenever I tried to emerge it. On my server the Berkeley/Subversion stuff is installed manually in /usr/local/ instead. Now I notice that the subversion ebuild seems to be more or less up-to-date again. Can anyone tell me if they've tried it, and if it works well enough for me to use? I admit I'd much rather be using ebuilds than manually installed /usr/local packages, but I won't install it untill I've heard from someone that it works (with the mod_dav_svn module for apache2 etc). Thanks, Tom -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
