RE: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
Unpacking patch-2.5.9.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/patch-2.5.9/work Source unpacked. configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use -- host. configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. If you go to the directory /var/tmp/portage/patch-2.5.9/work/patch-2.5.9 you'll find a config.log file. Open the file and you'll see that it is the output of what configure was doing when the failure occurred, and you can see the exact output message from gcc that was handed to configure. Note that the info will not be at the end of the file but actually embedded within it (the end of the file is a dump of variable settings configure had at the time the failure occurred). Typically you'll find something like an error about a missing library or header file or something. If you want to send me the config.log I'll help you figure it out. Dave -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
On Sunday 27 March 2005 10:53 pm, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: When emerging something, you get a log file in /var/tmp/portage/package/work/package/configure.log. Have a look at it and look for the compiler's errormessage. Found it. configure:1655: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -DLINUX -D_XOPEN i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory cc1: Broken pipe: error closing - Found `as' in the binutls directory, so I linked it over to put in my path. ln -s /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/2.15.92.0.2/ /usr/bin/binutils [EMAIL PROTECTED] shaw 33]% which as /usr/bin/binutils/as Same config.log, still can't find as. What am I missing here? Thanks, Shaw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
On Monday 28 March 2005 10:50 am, Shaw Vrana wrote: On Sunday 27 March 2005 10:53 pm, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: When emerging something, you get a log file in /var/tmp/portage/package/work/package/configure.log. Have a look at it and look for the compiler's errormessage. Found it. configure:1655: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -DLINUX -D_XOPEN i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory cc1: Broken pipe: error closing - Found `as' in the binutls directory, so I linked it over to put in my path. ln -s /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/2.15.92.0.2/ /usr/bin/binutils configure must be using the full path, because after symlinking the contents of the binutils-bin directly directly into /usr/bin, configure is able to find `as' and friends. This has left with a not so fresh feeling..should I reemerge binutils to clean up? Shaw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
configure:1655: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -DLINUX -D_XOPEN i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory cc1: Broken pipe: error closing Dude, you've got a seriously broken gentoo system :-( Your toolchain is corrupted probably due to a misguided attempt to alter your CHOST value after the initial install. I'd suggest re-emerging your entire toolchain (binutils, gcc, glibc) before going any further. Hopefully the end result will be a working toolchain that will get you by these problems... Dave -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
Can you compile a simple Helloworld.cxx?
When I look at the output of gcc-config, I see you have both version 3.3.5
and 3.4.3 installed. Are you sure these don't interact in some unexpected
way?
When emerging something, you get a log file
in /var/tmp/portage/package/work/package/configure.log. Have a look at
it and look for the compiler's errormessage.
Greetings
Alex
Am Montag, 28. März 2005 02:07 schrieb Shaw Vrana:
I've been reading up on this problem at
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-27486-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start
-0.html and bugs.gentoo.org, but I've not yet been successful fixing my
gcc woes. I believe this began after a portage update.
perhaps useful, maybe not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 47]% gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5 *
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardened
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardenednopie
[4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardenednossp
[5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3
[6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardened
[7] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardenednopie
[8] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardenednossp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 48]% grep CFLAGS /etc/make.conf
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
I ran fix_libtool_files.sh on 3.4.3, but I still get the error.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Shaw
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
emerge (1 of 9) sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 to /
md5 src_uri ;-) patch-2.5.9.tar.gz
Unpacking
source...http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-27486-postdays-0-postorder-
asc-start-0.html
Unpacking patch-2.5.9.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/patch-2.5.9/work
Source unpacked.
configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use
--host. configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
!!! ERROR: sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 38, Exitcode 2
!!! emake failed
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
!DSPAM:424751ae853712398315240!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables help!
On Sunday 27 March 2005 16:07, Shaw Vrana wrote: I ran fix_libtool_files.sh on 3.4.3, but I still get the error. Any ideas? Just for fun, try fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.4 (rather than 3.4.3) This seems to be the most common version giving problems. Also, perhaps useful, maybe not [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 47]% gcc-config -l [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5 * [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardened [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardenednopie [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-hardenednossp [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3 [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardened [7] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardenednopie [8] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-hardenednossp It seems odd to me that you have 3.4.3 emerged, but 3.3.5 is selected. Anyone else know what might be going on here? pgpOV5sCGOOPB.pgp Description: PGP signature
