Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Chris I
On 2003.11.05 14:12, Tom Wesley wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:34, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> Is that version masked?
>
> btw, did you try revdep-rebuild? That's supposed to rebuild
dependency packages to the new version..
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> > suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no
> > libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> > so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve
it, at
> > least so far
>
Yeah just run revdep-rebuild and after about 4-5hours of solid
compiling
(on a dual AMD 2400 no less) everything is working.  As a warning to
others the upgrade caused recompiles of about 70 packages on my  
system
and the openssl version was 0.9.7c-r1.
Weird. I recompiled all neccessary packages on a pentium-m 1.3GHz in  
just a short time. Most of the packages were things like balsa,  
openssh, ORBit2, and such. i wouldnt think more than 10 or so packages.

revdep-rebuild listed only unrelated ebuilds (why it wants to "rebuild"  
binary-only unreal-tournament is beyond me).

--

Chris I

The price of greatness is responsibility.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 05 November 2003 19:12, Tom Wesley wrote:

> Yeah just run revdep-rebuild and after about 4-5hours of solid compiling
> (on a dual AMD 2400 no less) everything is working.  As a warning to
> others the upgrade caused recompiles of about 70 packages on my system
> and the openssl version was 0.9.7c-r1.

Yesus, that's a *lot* of packages installed requirering libcrypto.
I was hit by this on a P4 2.something, non-HT HT (I dunno, /proc/cpuinfo says 
HT, but it doesn't work, bleh), and the rebuild took just a few minutes.
It's to be a firewall/router, so only has 2-3 packages more than system 
installed tho :)

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qXLtInuLMrk7bIwRAsrCAJ0baMnkDjLbpcnAsmmooNvdPFaXLwCfYn8w
nVKIOnFNLjuk4MdcN13c8so=
=MyWt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread mathieu perrenoud
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 20:52, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> You should actually run revdep-rebuild. Its not advisable to link things
> like that...
>
> It will recompile whats needed to run the new version.
>
> > hi, can you tell me from where, and to where i shall make the link, i
> > just upgraded, and cant find the libssl-0.9.7 and that
> >
> > have a nice day

until you find time to recompile... ;-)

/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6
/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6

-- 
mathieu


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Wesley
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 19:52, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> You should actually run revdep-rebuild. Its not advisable to link things like that...
> 
> It will recompile whats needed to run the new version.
> 
> > hi, can you tell me from where, and to where i shall make the link, i
> > just upgraded, and cant find the libssl-0.9.7 and that
> > 
> > have a nice day
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Yeah it worked for me... took a while, see my other post...


-- 
Tom Wesley


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Smelser
You should actually run revdep-rebuild. Its not advisable to link things like that...

It will recompile whats needed to run the new version.

> hi, can you tell me from where, and to where i shall make the link, i
> just upgraded, and cant find the libssl-0.9.7 and that
> 
> have a nice day

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Redeeman
hi, can you tell me from where, and to where i shall make the link, i
just upgraded, and cant find the libssl-0.9.7 and that

have a nice day

On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 22:33, Tom Wesley wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve it, at
> least so far
-- 
Regards, Redeeman
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\- against microsoft attachments



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-05 Thread Tom Wesley
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:34, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> Is that version masked?
> 
> btw, did you try revdep-rebuild? That's supposed to rebuild dependency packages to 
> the new version.. 
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> > suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no 
> > libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> > so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve it, at
> > least so far
> 

Yeah just run revdep-rebuild and after about 4-5hours of solid compiling
(on a dual AMD 2400 no less) everything is working.  As a warning to
others the upgrade caused recompiles of about 70 packages on my system
and the openssl version was 0.9.7c-r1.

-- 
Tom Wesley


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-04 Thread Tom Wesley
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:53, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:35, Dennis Freise wrote:
> > > > Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> > > > suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no 
> > libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> > > > so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a 
> > solve it, at
> > > > least so far
> > > 
> > > Running 'revdep-rebuild' (part of gentoolkit) is IMHO the 
> > right way to solve
> > > it. That rebuilds every package still in need of the old 
> > libssl-0.9.6, so
> > > that they from now on use the new libssl-0.9.7. Creating a 
> > symbolic link
> > > will work too, but it looks more like a hack than a 
> > solution to me :)
> > > 
> > > Greetings, Dennis
> > 
> > Reply to both, evolution and Galeon (together with gdm?) 
> > required this,
> > and the rebuild didn't work, so I got bored and added a link, 
> > although I
> > am sure this will be fixed better within a few moments of hitting the
> > send button.
> 
> Didn't work?? Was it a compile issue or? Sounds like a bug from what your saying 
> that needs to be submitted..
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

The compile went ok, I will hold of the bug report until morning, maybe
lunchtime tomorrow, am very tied up this end and may have missed
something.
I would appreciate anyone that remembers cc'ing me personally on a fix
reply though

-- 
Tom Wesley


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Smelser
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:35, Dennis Freise wrote:
> > > Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> > > suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no 
> libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> > > so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a 
> solve it, at
> > > least so far
> > 
> > Running 'revdep-rebuild' (part of gentoolkit) is IMHO the 
> right way to solve
> > it. That rebuilds every package still in need of the old 
> libssl-0.9.6, so
> > that they from now on use the new libssl-0.9.7. Creating a 
> symbolic link
> > will work too, but it looks more like a hack than a 
> solution to me :)
> > 
> > Greetings, Dennis
> 
> Reply to both, evolution and Galeon (together with gdm?) 
> required this,
> and the rebuild didn't work, so I got bored and added a link, 
> although I
> am sure this will be fixed better within a few moments of hitting the
> send button.

Didn't work?? Was it a compile issue or? Sounds like a bug from what your saying that 
needs to be submitted..

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-04 Thread Tom Wesley
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:35, Dennis Freise wrote:
> > Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> > suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> > so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve it, at
> > least so far
> 
> Running 'revdep-rebuild' (part of gentoolkit) is IMHO the right way to solve
> it. That rebuilds every package still in need of the old libssl-0.9.6, so
> that they from now on use the new libssl-0.9.7. Creating a symbolic link
> will work too, but it looks more like a hack than a solution to me :)
> 
> Greetings, Dennis

Reply to both, evolution and Galeon (together with gdm?) required this,
and the rebuild didn't work, so I got bored and added a link, although I
am sure this will be fixed better within a few moments of hitting the
send button.


-- 
Tom Wesley


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-04 Thread Dennis Freise
> Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve it, at
> least so far

Running 'revdep-rebuild' (part of gentoolkit) is IMHO the right way to solve
it. That rebuilds every package still in need of the old libssl-0.9.6, so
that they from now on use the new libssl-0.9.7. Creating a symbolic link
will work too, but it looks more like a hack than a solution to me :)

Greetings, Dennis


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] openssl upgrade

2003-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Smelser
Is that version masked?

btw, did you try revdep-rebuild? That's supposed to rebuild dependency packages to the 
new version.. 

> Hi all,
> 
> Just a quick warning:  I just upgraded my openssl to current and
> suddenly programs wouldn't start, complaining of no 
> libssl-0.9.6.  Just
> so people know, creating a symbolic link to 0.9.7 seems a solve it, at
> least so far

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list