Re: [gentoo-user] Mail-header

2003-09-15 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 15 September 2003 16:28, Lutz Feldgen wrote:
 It is really uncomfortable to have half of the mails to this list
 filtered out by gmx-anti-spam...there is no way to tell the filter to
 select by recipient-address.

The following headers are in each message:

Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail gentoo-user.gentoo.org
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


You can't use any of those? List-Id would probably be perfect, no?

Jason

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mail-header

2003-09-15 Thread Alexander Futasz
On 15 Sep 2003 09:28:23 +0200, Lutz Feldgen wrote:
 would it be a big problem for you or the list-manager to change the
 sender-address to the mailing-list-address?
 It is really uncomfortable to have half of the mails to this list
 filtered out by gmx-anti-spam...there is no way to tell the filter to
 select by recipient-address.

I turned GMX spamfiltering completely off and filter myself now. True -
I have to download all the spam, but my spam detection is way better. ;)

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mail-header

2003-09-15 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 15 September 2003 20:04, Alexander Futasz wrote:
 On 15 Sep 2003 09:28:23 +0200, Lutz Feldgen wrote:
  would it be a big problem for you or the list-manager to change the
  sender-address to the mailing-list-address?
  It is really uncomfortable to have half of the mails to this list
  filtered out by gmx-anti-spam...there is no way to tell the filter to
  select by recipient-address.

 I turned GMX spamfiltering completely off and filter myself now. True -
 I have to download all the spam, but my spam detection is way better. ;)

Just one word - SpamAssassin. I've been using it for about 3 months now 
filtering all incoming mails (over 1) and bayes scores very well. I still 
have to tweek it a bit more because about 1 in 50 spams are still not being 
detected and some Japanese mail is being misdetected, but all in all it's 
great!

Jason

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Mail-header

2003-09-15 Thread Spider
begin  quote
On 15 Sep 2003 09:28:23 +0200
Lutz Feldgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi there,
 
 would it be a big problem for you or the list-manager to change the
 sender-address to the mailing-list-address?
 It is really uncomfortable to have half of the mails to this list
 filtered out by gmx-anti-spam...there is no way to tell the filter to
 select by recipient-address.


Yep, It'd be a big problem. For the rest of us.

see, we've been suffering some real idi0tz here at times, You know the
kind that set an auto-responder to respond that I'm away from the
office at every email they recieve?  or the kind that bounce the
message + notification at each message it recieves because their INBOX
is full?

i'm sure you can imagine what this looks like after four hours, when the
headers are mangled as you suggest? Yep. each bounce goes to the list
(automagically) and then generates yet another bounce. increment this
feedback loop with each message from people going on with life,
complaining about the crap-flood and you have a very pretty sight.

soon the next person got a full mailbox too.   okay, now there's two
spambouncers feeding eachother.  


So, Yes. It would be a problem.  :-)

Better make your software WhiteList on List-Id  or Delivered To 
flags.

//Spider



-- 
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature