[gentoo-user] Gnome downgrade / g_malloc_n
Hi, After a few week of testing 2.30 release of Gnome using Gnome Overlay, I've decided to revert back to the stable tree. Now almost everything is compiled successfully, but a few ebuilds cannot be compiled. The only similarity I can found is this: undefined reference to `g_malloc_n' I've tried to recompile the related packages, but it does not help. Do you have any idea how can I get rid off this Thanks Laszlo
Re: [gentoo-user] Remotely working on Gentoo systems
You may give a chance to this. I'm not using every day, but it is a very
promising remote access solution. I think this is based on VNC as well
[I] net-misc/nx
Available versions: 3.3.0-r1 ~3.3.0-r4 ~3.3.0-r5 3.4.0 [M]~3.4.0-r1
{rdesktop vnc}
Installed versions: 3.4.0(17.29.52 2010-05-12)
Homepage:http://www.nomachine.com/developers.php
Description: NX compression technology core libraries
[I] net-misc/nxcl
Available versions: 0.9-r1 ~0.9-r2 {dbus doc nxclient}
Installed versions: 0.9-r1(17.32.30 2010-05-12)(dbus -doc -nxclient)
Homepage:http://developer.berlios.de/projects/freenx/
Description: A library for building NX clients
[I] net-misc/nxclient
Available versions: 3.3.0.6!s 3.4.0.5!s ~3.4.0.7!s
Installed versions: 3.4.0.5!s(17.30.37 2010-05-12)
Homepage:http://www.nomachine.com/
Description: X11/VNC/NXServer client (remote desktops over
low-bandwidth links)
[I] net-misc/nxnode
Available versions: 3.3.0.17!s 3.4.0.6!s ~3.4.0.6-r1!s [M]~3.4.0.11!s
{rdesktop vnc}
Installed versions: 3.4.0.6!s(17.35.14 2010-05-12)(rdesktop vnc)
Homepage:http://www.nomachine.com/
Description: shared components between the different editions
of NoMachine's NX Servers
[I] net-misc/nxserver-freeedition
Available versions: 3.3.0.14!s 3.4.0.8!s ~3.4.0.12!s
Installed versions: 3.4.0.8!s(17.35.28 2010-05-12)
Homepage:http://www.nomachine.com/
Description: Free edition NX server from NoMachine
Re: [gentoo-user] Remotely working on Gentoo systems
Il 11/06/2010 11:00, SpaceCake ha scritto:
You may give a chance to this. I'm not using every day, but it is a
very promising remote access solution. I think this is based on VNC as
well
[I] net-misc/nx
Available versions: 3.3.0-r1 ~3.3.0-r4 ~3.3.0-r5 3.4.0
[M]~3.4.0-r1 {rdesktop vnc}
Installed versions: 3.4.0(17.29.52 2010-05-12)
Homepage: http://www.nomachine.com/developers.php
Description: NX compression technology core libraries
NX is very simple to install
free for few simultaneous connections
efficient in low bandwidth situations
scalable to enterprise level
secured by https
available clients for almost every platform
andrea
Re: [gentoo-user] Remotely working on Gentoo systems
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:33 AM, AG a...@email.it wrote:
Il 11/06/2010 11:00, SpaceCake ha scritto:
You may give a chance to this. I'm not using every day, but it is a very
promising remote access solution. I think this is based on VNC as well
[I] net-misc/nx
Available versions: 3.3.0-r1 ~3.3.0-r4 ~3.3.0-r5 3.4.0 [M]~3.4.0-r1
{rdesktop vnc}
Installed versions: 3.4.0(17.29.52 2010-05-12)
Homepage: http://www.nomachine.com/developers.php
Description: NX compression technology core libraries
NX is very simple to install
free for few simultaneous connections
efficient in low bandwidth situations
scalable to enterprise level
secured by https
available clients for almost every platform
andrea
Request for more information:
1) Exactly what client-side and server-side flags are you telling us to
set. The names have me somewhat overwhelmed.
2) Is there a connection between NX and SSH? Could you point me at some
setup docs (if they don't come automatically).
--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fast checksumming of whole partitions
On Monday 07 June 2010 19:54:04 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net [10-06-07 20:28]: Does anyone has experiences with gparted? I have no experience with Parted Magic, but I have used a lot the Gparted live CD (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php). No idea on how the two compare. As for gparted (which is a lot more than a gui for parted), I have used it on ext4 a couple of times and it managed to complete the copy without destroying anything, so I'd say it works. On the other hand, I copied *lots* of ext3 and ntfs partitions, and it never failed me. BTW, by default gparted does *not* do sector-by-sector partition copies. In my opinion this is a much better approach if you do not need a bit-exact copy of the original (e.g. if you're doing forensics or debugging filesystems), but in the end it's up to you. andrea Hi Andreas, do I understand right here: Instead of using dcfldd or simply dd to copy one disk to another for backup reasons it is much better/faster to use gparted to simply copy all partitions from sda to sdb using sda1=sdb1, sda2=sdb2,... and so forth? Is there something like a batch job or scripting interface for gparted so that I can give gparted the complete copy job once, go to sleep and next moring the copy is done? Is gparted able to shut down the system after finishing its work or to end itsself so a little script can detect the job is done and halt the system then? Am I being old-fashioned, or is there anything wrong with rsync (if not tar/star) for this purpose? Make sure to add the relevant option for sparse files and only bits and bytes with data will be copied over. Therefore it will be faster than dd at any rate. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?
Hi, while still setting up my new system I wonder, whether there somethning better than 'procmail' to process mails (maildir-format). I am getting my mails via fetchmail/POP3. Any better program for that task? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Have a nice weekend! Best regards, mcc -- Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.
