Re: [gentoo-user] contribution to colorgcc
What I meant was: If you're going to 'take over' maintenance, be ready for bug reports and 'suggestions' from other users. That will require some effort ;) Anyways, glad to see people picks up when upstream disappears from the radar. Rgds, On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:26:36AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: >> (Please forgive my top-posting) >> >> Commendable effort, my friend. Have you tried asking in the gentoo-dev ML? >> >> Rgds, >> > No effort at all. The program helps and makes my life easier a lot. > Yes, i also asked the gentoo-dev. > > regards, Dmitry > >> >> On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > >> > Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? >> > I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for >> > the >> > sun, ibm, hp and intel compilers. >> > I pushed the current version to https://github.com/dgoncharov/colorgcc. >> > You can pull from there or i can submit a set of patches. >> > >> > regards, Dmitry >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer >> My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ >> > > -- -- Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
Re: [gentoo-user] contribution to colorgcc
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 09:26:36AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > (Please forgive my top-posting) > > Commendable effort, my friend. Have you tried asking in the gentoo-dev ML? > > Rgds, > No effort at all. The program helps and makes my life easier a lot. Yes, i also asked the gentoo-dev. regards, Dmitry > > On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? > > I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for the > > sun, ibm, hp and intel compilers. > > I pushed the current version to https://github.com/dgoncharov/colorgcc. > > You can pull from there or i can submit a set of patches. > > > > regards, Dmitry > > > > > > > -- > -- > Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer > My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ >
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: contribution to colorgcc
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 07:52:35AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 08/07/2011 05:14 AM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? > > No. There's no upstream for it anymore. Packagers maintain their own > versions and fixes are not contributed upstream since there's no upstream. > > Yes, there is not upstream. I am looking for a gentoo maintainer who can accept patches. Alternatively, i can roll out a colorgcc tarball and start a new upstream. I use the program with 4 of these compilers on a daily basis and maintain anyway. regards, Dmitry
[gentoo-user] Re: contribution to colorgcc
On 08/07/2011 05:14 AM, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: Greetings, Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? No. There's no upstream for it anymore. Packagers maintain their own versions and fixes are not contributed upstream since there's no upstream.
Re: [gentoo-user] contribution to colorgcc
(Please forgive my top-posting) Commendable effort, my friend. Have you tried asking in the gentoo-dev ML? Rgds, On 2011-08-07, Dmitry Goncharov wrote: > Greetings, > > Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? > I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for the > sun, ibm, hp and intel compilers. > I pushed the current version to https://github.com/dgoncharov/colorgcc. > You can pull from there or i can submit a set of patches. > > regards, Dmitry > > -- -- Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
[gentoo-user] contribution to colorgcc
Greetings, Is anybody maintaining dev-util/colorgcc? I'd like to contribute certain improvements for gcc and also support for the sun, ibm, hp and intel compilers. I pushed the current version to https://github.com/dgoncharov/colorgcc. You can pull from there or i can submit a set of patches. regards, Dmitry
Re: [gentoo-user] logrotate: /var/log/portage/elog "insecure permissions"?
On Friday 05 Aug 2011 23:08:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:59:00 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Yes, this was introduced in 3.8.0 to fix security issues [1]. Change
> > your config to look like this:
> > /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log {
> > su portage portage
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Disclaimer: I've not really tried this (yet) but I think I'm able to
> > read changelogs and man-pages. ;-)
>
> Yes that fixes it. The latest portage ebuilds include an updated config
> file.
Hmm ... it still complains here!
error: error setting owner of /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log-20110801.gz:
Operation not permitted
This is my /etc/logrotate.d/elog-save-summary:
===
/var/log/portage/elog/summary.log {
su portage portage
missingok
nocreate
delaycompress
}
===
# ls -la /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 4326 Aug 6 09:44 /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log
Can you see anything amiss?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Re: Redirecting emerge.log to pipe: "emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek"
On 08/06/2011 12:29 PM, Jarry wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to redirect /var/log/emerge.log to pipe. > I removed original log-file and created pipe with the same > name & permissions, but potrage does not write logs there. > Instead, it just issues message: > > emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek > > Where is the problem? Is it actually possible to redirect > emerge-logs to pipes (or syslog)? Hi Jarry, #grep LOG /etc/make.conf # PORT_LOGDIR is the location where portage will store all the logs it #PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage If that doesn't solve your problem, then you may need to explain the problem you're trying to solve. (I'm always annoyed when I'm forced to change the question instead of getting the answer :)
[gentoo-user] Re: [almost SOLVED] NFSv4: 32-bit server versus 64-bit client?
On 08/05/2011 03:51 AM, victor romanchuk wrote: > >> I'm trying to be a good gentoo netizen by nfs-sharing /usr/portage between >> my three local gentoo machines, and failing :( >> >> After weeks of fiddling, I discovered today that my problems come from >> using a 32-bit machine to serve my two 64-bit NFS clients(!) >> >> (I'll mention up front that NFSv3 works perfectly -- only NFSv4 is bad.) >> > > this is due to different authentication methods used in nfs3 and nfs4 and does > not rely on installation arch (32/64bit). you have to tune up nfs4 > infrastructure. on both client and server make sure you have > > - nfs4 and inotify support in kernel > - net-fs/nfs-utils installed with nfs4 support > - grep NFS_NEEDED_SERVICES /etc/conf.d/nfs shows > 'NFS_NEEDED_SERVICES="rpc.idmapd"' > - grep Domain /etc/idmapd.conf shows 'Domain = ' That was a good hint, thanks. I finally figured out by trial and error that the correct gentoo way to start idmapd is by starting /etc/init.d/nfsmount on the client. That fixed the bad uid/gid numbers I was seeing. But, I still have a permissions problem I can't figure out. The exported /usr/portage mounts okay on the client with rw privileges, but I still get a "read-only filesystem" error when I try to write to it. Again by trial and error I discovered that restarting the nfs server fixes the write problem, but with a gotcha: the first write to the mounted NFS filesystem hangs for about a minute before it finally succeeds. Everything works normally after that. That first write process hangs in a D+ state, apparently waiting for something to time out after a minute or so. Any idea what could cause that? Many thanks!
[gentoo-user] Redirecting emerge.log to pipe: "emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek"
Hi, I'm trying to redirect /var/log/emerge.log to pipe. I removed original log-file and created pipe with the same name & permissions, but potrage does not write logs there. Instead, it just issues message: emergelog(): [Errno 29] Illegal seek Where is the problem? Is it actually possible to redirect emerge-logs to pipes (or syslog)? Jarry -- ___ This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists! Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted.
Re: [gentoo-user] Network Topology Diagrams
On Friday 05 Aug 2011 20:37:12 Daniel Troeder wrote: > On 08/05/2011 07:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > > Zenmap - part of net-analyzer/nmap can do that for you. There is also net-misc/lanmap not sure how effective it is. -- - Yohan Pereira "A man can do as he will, but not will as he will" - Schopenhauer
