Re: [gentoo-user] Force Firefox to use gecko-mediaplayer for webm
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 10:53:22 AM IST, Alecks Gates wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: So yeah, the question is clear. How do I force Firefox to play webm videos using gecko-mediaplayer? Compile firefox without webm support? Or there's some other way around? -- Nilesh Govindrajan http://nileshgr.com Go to Firefox preferences, Applications and type "webm" you should see a dropdown box of what you can do with it. That's just a quick assumption, mine is already set to gecko-mediaplayer. Tried that before posting here. No use. -- Nilesh Govindrajan http://nileshgr.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Force Firefox to use gecko-mediaplayer for webm
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > So yeah, the question is clear. > How do I force Firefox to play webm videos using gecko-mediaplayer? Compile > firefox without webm support? > > Or there's some other way around? > > -- > Nilesh Govindrajan > http://nileshgr.com > Go to Firefox preferences, Applications and type "webm" you should see a dropdown box of what you can do with it. That's just a quick assumption, mine is already set to gecko-mediaplayer.
[gentoo-user] Force Firefox to use gecko-mediaplayer for webm
So yeah, the question is clear. How do I force Firefox to play webm videos using gecko-mediaplayer? Compile firefox without webm support? Or there's some other way around? -- Nilesh Govindrajan http://nileshgr.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Printer isn't working. Help, please!
on 07/21/2012 08:58 PM Alan Mackenzie wrote the following: > Evening, Experts! > > My printer isn't printing. > > More precisely, when in CUPS 1.5.2 (localhost:631), CUPS fails to find > the printer. When I click on "Find New Printers" it comes back with > "Available Printers - No Printers Found.". > > My system has been like this since I converted back from mdev to udev. > Though I have just built Linux 3.3.8 in the hope that a new kernel build > would help. ;-(. > > Help would be most appreciated. > > TIA! > Edit /etc/cups/cupsd.conf and set "Browsing On", afterwards re-start or reload cups.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : (1) which CPU ?
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 20/07/12 10:24, Philip Webb wrote: >> >> I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: >> it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as price. >> >> A quick look at what was available in April suggested >> an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel 3.2 >> + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was excellent. > > > The best performance for money is the i5 2550K CPU. If you want the > integrated graphics because you don't have an actual graphics card, you can > go for the 2500K. > > This is a Sandy Bridge CPU. I normally don't recommend the Ivy Bridge ones > because they run hotter, so changing the clock multipliers isn't as fun as > with Sandy Bridge. > > Actually according to the link Florian linked here[1], AMD is doing extremely well regarding price/performance. Unless you want a Celeron or a Pentium. i5s do rate up there, though... these tests are also from Windows. [1] http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_value_available.html
Re: [gentoo-user] Printer isn't working. Help, please!
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> Evening, Experts! >>> >>> My printer isn't printing. >>> >>> More precisely, when in CUPS 1.5.2 (localhost:631), CUPS fails to find >>> the printer. When I click on "Find New Printers" it comes back with >>> "Available Printers - No Printers Found.". >>> >>> My system has been like this since I converted back from mdev to udev. >>> Though I have just built Linux 3.3.8 in the hope that a new kernel build >>> would help. ;-(. >>> >>> Help would be most appreciated. >> >> What kind of printer? How is it connected to the computer? >> >> What USE flags do you have enabled for the CUPS build? If you >> re-emerge CUPS, it will spit some warnings at you if it detects >> problems with your kernel configuration. >> >> -- >> :wq >> > > Personally I prefer enabling USB printer support in kernel instead of > cups (both of them are mutually exclusive!). Because, cupsd sometimes > chokes when you shut off and on the printer many times. Once that > happened I switched to kernel support and never faced the problem > again. If you have HP printer, install hplip package. Read cups logs in /var/log/cups or whatever.
Re: [gentoo-user] Printer isn't working. Help, please!
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> Evening, Experts! >> >> My printer isn't printing. >> >> More precisely, when in CUPS 1.5.2 (localhost:631), CUPS fails to find >> the printer. When I click on "Find New Printers" it comes back with >> "Available Printers - No Printers Found.". >> >> My system has been like this since I converted back from mdev to udev. >> Though I have just built Linux 3.3.8 in the hope that a new kernel build >> would help. ;-(. >> >> Help would be most appreciated. > > What kind of printer? How is it connected to the computer? > > What USE flags do you have enabled for the CUPS build? If you > re-emerge CUPS, it will spit some warnings at you if it detects > problems with your kernel configuration. > > -- > :wq > Personally I prefer enabling USB printer support in kernel instead of cups (both of them are mutually exclusive!). Because, cupsd sometimes chokes when you shut off and on the printer many times. Once that happened I switched to kernel support and never faced the problem again.
Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : (1) which CPU ?
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:55 AM, wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Alecks Gates wrote > >> I'd pick AMD, and very likely one of their APUs if you don't need >> intense graphics, as they seem to be able to handle most things well >> and even some light gaming. > > How do AMD's and Intel's open source video drivers compare? > > -- > Walter Dnes > I've never used an Intel chip actually (well not in ages, and not on Linux), but they tend to have the best open source drivers. Their graphics chips aren't nearly as good, though. AMD radeon open source drivers are getting better with every kernel. Apparently there was a huge performance increase with 3.5 alone. They are catching up and as long as you don't have something brand new the support is pretty good (and apparently even this is getting better, too). Funny enough, there are some things I've actually had run faster using radeon than fglrx, mostly with wine games. But the radeon driver still does not have full support and even some things will simply not work with them.
Re: [gentoo-user] Printer isn't working. Help, please!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Evening, Experts! > > My printer isn't printing. > > More precisely, when in CUPS 1.5.2 (localhost:631), CUPS fails to find > the printer. When I click on "Find New Printers" it comes back with > "Available Printers - No Printers Found.". > > My system has been like this since I converted back from mdev to udev. > Though I have just built Linux 3.3.8 in the hope that a new kernel build > would help. ;-(. > > Help would be most appreciated. What kind of printer? How is it connected to the computer? What USE flags do you have enabled for the CUPS build? If you re-emerge CUPS, it will spit some warnings at you if it detects problems with your kernel configuration. -- :wq
[gentoo-user] Printer isn't working. Help, please!
Evening, Experts! My printer isn't printing. More precisely, when in CUPS 1.5.2 (localhost:631), CUPS fails to find the printer. When I click on "Find New Printers" it comes back with "Available Printers - No Printers Found.". My system has been like this since I converted back from mdev to udev. Though I have just built Linux 3.3.8 in the hope that a new kernel build would help. ;-(. Help would be most appreciated. TIA! -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Re: [gentoo-user] Need a clue about merging logical volumes/groups with lvm2
walt writes: > I know there are a few lvm2 experts lurking here :) > > I have a 500gig disk that is split roughly in half between two volume > groups, each containing four physical volumes, and each vg is formatted > into an ext4 filesystem of roughly 250GB. > > What I plan to do is merge the two volume groups into one, containing > one big ext4 filesystem, which will contain all of the files currently > on the disk. > > Can this be done without copying one of the existing ext4 filesystems > to a separate drive first, and then copying it back after extending > the remaining vg/filesystem? (One filesystem has 24GB free and the > other has 25GB free.) > > I'm expecting a "no" but I'd like to be wrong :) I think you are right. But if you had more free space, it might be possible. So your physical volumes are about 63 G each. If you free that much space on one filesystem, reduce the file system, then reduce the LV, you can use pvmove to move stuff from one PV you want to empty to the others. When done, you can remove the now empty PV from the VG with vgreduce. Then use vgextend to add the PV to the other VG. Extend the LV of that VG and enlarge the file system, copy stuff from the other FS over until you can free another PV. And so on. But copying all stuff of one VG to another location would be much easier. And less error-prone. Wonko
[gentoo-user] Need a clue about merging logical volumes/groups with lvm2
I know there are a few lvm2 experts lurking here :) I have a 500gig disk that is split roughly in half between two volume groups, each containing four physical volumes, and each vg is formatted into an ext4 filesystem of roughly 250GB. What I plan to do is merge the two volume groups into one, containing one big ext4 filesystem, which will contain all of the files currently on the disk. Can this be done without copying one of the existing ext4 filesystems to a separate drive first, and then copying it back after extending the remaining vg/filesystem? (One filesystem has 24GB free and the other has 25GB free.) I'm expecting a "no" but I'd like to be wrong :)
Re: [gentoo-user] cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps
usr/share/kde4/services/settings-icon-view.desktop exists? dbus is running? ya@shvabra ~ $ ls -l /usr/share/kde4/services/settings-icon-view.desktop -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7836 Apr 30 01:05 /usr/share/kde4/services/settings-icon-view.desktop ya@shvabra ~ $ /etc/init.d/dbus status * status: started Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2012, 16:59:11 schrieb ivan ivanov: Hello, list. I just installed gentoo for the first time. I am using openbox wm and some kde apps within it (krusader, for example). I installed the systemsettings package(4.8.3) to configure the kde apps. The problem is that i cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps. There is no entry for the icon theme configuration in the systemsettings (please see http://www.image-share.com/ijpg-1633-222.html as an example). Changing the name of icon theme in the config file (~/.kde4/share/config/kdeglobals) gives nothing. So, the question is: how to change icon theme in the kde apps?
Re: [gentoo-user] cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2012, 16:59:11 schrieb ivan ivanov: > Hello, list. I just installed gentoo for the first time. I am using > openbox wm and some kde apps within it (krusader, for example). I > installed the systemsettings package(4.8.3) to configure the kde apps. > The problem is that i cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps. There > is no entry for the icon theme configuration in the systemsettings > (please see http://www.image-share.com/ijpg-1633-222.html as an > example). Changing the name of icon theme in the config file > (~/.kde4/share/config/kdeglobals) gives nothing. So, the question is: > how to change icon theme in the kde apps? usr/share/kde4/services/settings-icon-view.desktop exists? dbus is running? -- #163933
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : (1) which CPU ?
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2012, 15:33:05 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 20/07/12 10:24, Philip Webb wrote: > > I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: > > it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as price. > > > A quick look at what was available in April suggested > > an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel 3.2 > > + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was excellent. > > […] > > I don't want to pay a premium price for a bleeding-edge device > > which wb available at a more normal price a few months later. Those two statements are a bit contradicting. Generally, I wouldn’t buy an i7. First, those high-end components tend to be comparatively more expensive than their smaller siblings (regarding bang for the buck). Okay, it’s a quad with HT instead of “just a quad” (oh my, the times we live in), but secondly, if it’s *mostly* a desktop and occasionally performance-critical, I think it is also a waste of power. More power means more heat means more fan noise. > > I wb buying it from the local store (Canada Computers), not on-line. > > > Does anyone have thoughts or advice ? A friend of mine built a new machine recently. I too am planning on doing this once I got the bucks (hopefully) in a few months. So we picked components together, based on recommendations of an “efficient home-brew PC” article in computer magazine c’t. We know that Intel is more expensive, but also less power-hungry and known to work excellent both with Linux and with other components. And my friend believes that the Intel graphics drivers are still superior from a FOSS standpoint (he had an ATI in his old system). Using the comprehensive Wikipedia articles on Ivy Bridge¹ and LGA1155², we decided for the biggest i5 (3570K, ~220€), as it has the bigger of the two HD Graphics chips (external Graphics were not on the shoping list). This new baby built GCC in 12 minutes and a bit. First he wanted an Intel board, but because those don’t have VGA anymore, he went for Gigagybe. He was building a big tower ATX system, and so chose the Z77 (around 100€). I, however, am planning for something more modest, a cute mATX system with medium power. Right now I’m planning on a B75 board. It has all *I* need and is considerably cheaper (70€). I think I may also take the smaller i5 that comes with HD4000, the 3475S, which is around 25€ cheaper. But even then, it is still a beast when compared to my Core 2 Duo laptop which has to run permanently throttled due to its ageing heat spreader. > This is a Sandy Bridge CPU. I normally don't recommend the Ivy Bridge > ones because they run hotter, so changing the clock multipliers isn't as > fun as with Sandy Bridge. Yeah, according to the aforementioned Wikipedia article¹, they changed the heat spreader material inside. However, the 2550K you recommended has a TDP of almost 100W, whereas Ivy Bridge maxes at 77W. How much those figues are to be taken as real-world values is of course something else. A nice improvement of Ivy Bridge in my view is its integrated USB3 controller, which, according to some tests, is considerably better than the patched-on solutions of Sandy Bridge boards. And if you don’t want a dedicated graphics card but still want some GPU power, that’s of course another plus for Ivy. Hm... perhaps one can use the best of both worlds and use a Sandy CPU ond an Ivy board? The other way around would work with a BIOS upgrade. Footnoty stuff ¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture) ¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155 -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. “Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems.” – Linus Torvalds
[gentoo-user] cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps
Hello, list. I just installed gentoo for the first time. I am using openbox wm and some kde apps within it (krusader, for example). I installed the systemsettings package(4.8.3) to configure the kde apps. The problem is that i cannot set an icon theme for the kde apps. There is no entry for the icon theme configuration in the systemsettings (please see http://www.image-share.com/ijpg-1633-222.html as an example). Changing the name of icon theme in the config file (~/.kde4/share/config/kdeglobals) gives nothing. So, the question is: how to change icon theme in the kde apps?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new machine : (1) which CPU ?
2012/7/21 Nikos Chantziaras : > On 20/07/12 10:24, Philip Webb wrote: >> >> I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: >> it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as price. >> >> A quick look at what was available in April suggested >> an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel 3.2 >> + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was excellent. > > > The best performance for money is the i5 2550K CPU. If you want the > integrated graphics because you don't have an actual graphics card, you can > go for the 2500K. For those don't want an integrated graphics, buy Xeon E3-123? serise CPU. the same price as i5 2500K , but you got 8 thread :) > > This is a Sandy Bridge CPU. I normally don't recommend the Ivy Bridge ones > because they run hotter, so changing the clock multipliers isn't as fun as > with Sandy Bridge. > >
[gentoo-user] Re: new machine : (1) which CPU ?
On 20/07/12 10:24, Philip Webb wrote: I plan to build a new machine in the next few months: it wb for regular desktop use, but performance is as important as price. A quick look at what was available in April suggested an Intel Ivy Bridge i7 ( 22 nm ) ; Phoronix said it works with Kernel 3.2 + an Intel Z77 mobo (I usually buy ASUS) & that power/watt was excellent. The best performance for money is the i5 2550K CPU. If you want the integrated graphics because you don't have an actual graphics card, you can go for the 2500K. This is a Sandy Bridge CPU. I normally don't recommend the Ivy Bridge ones because they run hotter, so changing the clock multipliers isn't as fun as with Sandy Bridge.
Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : (1) which CPU ?
Hello! On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:44:11 +0200 Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 21.07.2012 07:55, schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Alecks Gates wrote > > > >> I'd pick AMD, and very likely one of their APUs if you don't need > >> intense graphics, as they seem to be able to handle most things > >> well and even some light gaming. > > > > How do AMD's and Intel's open source video drivers compare? > > > > Last time I tried to use AMD's open source driver, it worked well for > office applications and minor OpenGL (glxgears, desktop effects, etc.) > but it couldn't play a DVD on full screen (1920 * x) without frame > drops. (Yes, I tried tuning parameters with mplayer2). > > Intel's driver works well enough for this but it doesn't have much > head room, either. > > ATI's closed source driver works pretty well, too, nowadays. I had > trouble with xorg-server-1.12 but haven't investigated it, yet. > > Regards, > Florian Philipp > One of my friends uses ATI video card both on desktop and laptop machines and he told me recently that the free driver for ATI video chips ( http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/ati ) is very good nowadays and is being actively developed. He also said that the performance of his video card with open-source driver in different modes is almost the same as with the proprietary driver. I just don't remember the exact video card model, unfortunately. And according to this article: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA3NDE AMD releases the code for some newer chips as well. Which gives more chance for the new hardware to work good with GNU/Linux. Regards, Vladimir -
Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : (1) which CPU ?
Am 21.07.2012 07:55, schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:49:32PM -0500, Alecks Gates wrote > >> I'd pick AMD, and very likely one of their APUs if you don't need >> intense graphics, as they seem to be able to handle most things well >> and even some light gaming. > > How do AMD's and Intel's open source video drivers compare? > Last time I tried to use AMD's open source driver, it worked well for office applications and minor OpenGL (glxgears, desktop effects, etc.) but it couldn't play a DVD on full screen (1920 * x) without frame drops. (Yes, I tried tuning parameters with mplayer2). Intel's driver works well enough for this but it doesn't have much head room, either. ATI's closed source driver works pretty well, too, nowadays. I had trouble with xorg-server-1.12 but haven't investigated it, yet. Regards, Florian Philipp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
