Re: [gentoo-user] if possible - download gentoo wiki docs
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 18:49:11 -0600 Bruce Hill wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 04:39:26PM -0800, Edward M wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm wondering if it is possible to download the gentoo wiki docs in > > pdf, or other format. so I can read them in my tablet, when i have > > no wifi access available. I can not find a way to download them. > > How does the attached file look? > > From Firefox on the wiki page on the left click: > Printable version > > Then in Firefox: > File -> Print -> Print to file -> Output Format -> PDF > and be sure to name the file and choose output location. > > Hope that helps. > > Bruce Hi Bruce, Thank you for the instructions and the attachment, this will help me a lot. The attachment looked great in my tablet.
[gentoo-user] if possible - download gentoo wiki docs
Hello, I'm wondering if it is possible to download the gentoo wiki docs in pdf, or other format. so I can read them in my tablet, when i have no wifi access available. I can not find a way to download them. thanks
[gentoo-user] Re: KDE nepomuk memory usage
Alexander Puchmayr linznet.at> writes: > How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? > I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes > occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. iotop (in portage) may help? There is another app, that I've never tried but folks rave about, memtop, but it's not in portage. A while back, I posted about Ftrace (function trace) and some non portage ebuild, that may help. hth, James
[gentoo-user] Re: KDE nepomuk memory usage
On 26/12/13 21:13, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: Hi there, How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. KDE's "System Activity" (KSysGuard) is more accurate.
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage
On 12/27/13 08:50, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
> On Freitag, 27. Dezember 2013, 00:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> What column in htop shows that number?
>>
>> top, htop, and all their friends do not display what most people assume
>> they display. Modern OSes (for more than a decade now) manage memory in
>> a way that makes it impossible to answer "how much memory is this app
>> using?"
>>
>> If you are looking at the VIRT column, just ignore it, that column is
>> practically useless for most rational viewings of {h,}top
> I know, the VIRT column shows the size of the virtual adress space of the
> process, and this has nothing to do with the real, physical amount of memory
> allocated.
>
> The RES column shows the resident memory, i.e. those pages actually in use
> and
> kept in memory, exclusive those pages swapped out. This column shows
> currently
> 1185M (after rebooting this morning)
>
>
>
I think the best way to measure how much memory a process is using is to
kill it and see how much memory is freed.
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage
On Freitag, 27. Dezember 2013, 00:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> What column in htop shows that number?
>
> top, htop, and all their friends do not display what most people assume
> they display. Modern OSes (for more than a decade now) manage memory in
> a way that makes it impossible to answer "how much memory is this app
> using?"
>
> If you are looking at the VIRT column, just ignore it, that column is
> practically useless for most rational viewings of {h,}top
I know, the VIRT column shows the size of the virtual adress space of the
process, and this has nothing to do with the real, physical amount of memory
allocated.
The RES column shows the resident memory, i.e. those pages actually in use and
kept in memory, exclusive those pages swapped out. This column shows currently
1185M (after rebooting this morning)
Best regards
Alex
Re: [gentoo-user] kernel - locating option
On Friday 27 Dec 2013 02:57:43 Joseph wrote: > On 12/27/13 00:59, Mick wrote: > >> >Run emerge --sync to get the latest sources and then look under general > >> >to find it. It is under 'General setup' alright: > >> > > >> >General setup ---> > >> >... > >> > > >> > [*] System V IPC > >> > [*] POSIX Message Queues > >> > [*] open by fhandle syscalls <--This one! > >> > > >> >HTH. > >> > >> Thank you! Yes, I found it. > >> Though, it would be nice if I look for an option to enable, from search > >> menu "/" if it finds it I should be able to select it :-/ > > > >I think xconfig may be easier for this purpose? I'm not sure, but there > >are other ncurses, or GUI-fied kernel configuration applications. Try > >this to see > > > >if it serves your purpose when logged into an X session: > > make xconfig > > > >Use Ctrl+f to search for particular modules. Don't forget to save your > >changes before you build your new kernel! > > I tried to search for "CONFIG_FHANDLE" using "xconfig" and it can not even > find it; so this application is useless :-/ It may not be as useless as you think. Try to search for fhandle and you'll see it coming up. It should also have a little box for you to tick, which is what you were asking for. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] kernel - locating option
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:57:43 -0700, Joseph wrote: > I tried to search for "CONFIG_FHANDLE" using "xconfig" and it can not > even find it; so this application is useless :-/ You don't search for CONFIG_FHANDLE, just FHANDLE or fhandle. Both menuconfig and xconfig find it here, don't be so quick to blame the software. -- Neil Bothwick Bug: (n.) any program feature not yet described to the marketing department. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] vmware-player-6.0.0.1295980 and gnome?
greets ... I was curious again and unmasked the hardmasked gnome-3.10-stuff as mentioned in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486484 So far it works fine on both my desktop and thinkpad. The only issue I see right now is vmware-player crashing when I want to open/resume my small Windows-VM. This might have to do with gnome-3.10 or not, no idea! Does anyone else here have problems with the player lately? Couldn't find anything on bgo. Maybe I should install a small WM in parallel to check if it's gnome or not. Recommendations? The underlying reason for needing windows in a VM is the fact that I can't sync my Suunto Ambit2 watch with movescount.com as they don't provide a linux-binary and the moveslink-windows-binary does not install with wine here. See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30753 ... would be great if someone knows a solution for this as well! Thanks! Stefan
