Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New wireless adapter breaks nfs exports
On 08/10/2014 01:39, walt wrote: On 10/05/2014 08:31 PM, Tom H wrote: On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: This machine (my nfsv3 file server) just got a new wireless adapter, which works fine for everything except serving files :( mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported google shows me lots about slow nfs connections over wireless but nothing about non-support. I'm using only nfs3 ATM because I've had so many problems with nfs4 in the past. I thought I'd ask here if nfs4 might fix the problem before changing everything. NFS works over wifi. Have you tried mounting with -v and/or -o nfsvers=3? Yes, about 30 seconds ago :) #mount -v -t nfs -o nfsvers=3 a6://usr/portage /mnt mount.nfs: timeout set for Tue Oct 7 16:35:39 2014 mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'nfsvers=3,addr=192.168.1.75' mount.nfs: prog 13, trying vers=3, prot=6 mount.nfs: trying 192.168.1.75 prog 13 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049 mount.nfs: prog 15, trying vers=3, prot=17 mount.nfs: trying 192.168.1.75 prog 15 vers 3 prot UDP port 36168 mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported mount.nfs: Protocol not supported I have nfsv4 working correctly so the urgency is gone but I'm still curious if nfsv3 really should work over wifi as well as nfsv4. nfs3 over wifi works just fine for me, I use it all the time at home. Setting it up was no different to setting up a wired interface - set exports on the server, mount from the client. I suspect the problems you are having are unrelated to wifi as such and are probably something more mundane. I take it you've checked all the usual suspects such as your current IP is allowed to connect to the server, there's no access rules blocking you and so on? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 1:32:48 AM MSK, Mick wrote: I agree with Neil. I can't really see what Dolphin offers that Konqueror didn't already have. It has Git and Mercurial plugins and split view. Not that I actively use those features but Dolphin seems to be more responsive anyway. For tasks like re-organizing home directory (sorting large quantity of files) both are inconvenient, I use Krusader for such things.
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 06:29:13 AM Mick wrote: On Wednesday 08 Oct 2014 05:46:40 J. Roeleveld wrote: On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 09:18:04 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML. Why not use Dolphin as file manager? Because neither it nor Krusader is anywhere near as flexible. I still consider the introduction of Dolphin to be a major backwards step of KDE4. I think that's personal preference. I like Dolphin as it allows me to quickly switch to network shares (of different types) from the left of the window. Konqueror only shows the files and folders, not the Places. And I haven't found an option to add those (or something similar) How do I configure Konqueror to give me a similar view? -- Joost Do you mean: F9 to Show Sidebar, then right click on it, Configure/Add New/Places Sidebar Module? Yes, but I miss the quick overview. With the file-indexing of semantic desktop enabled, I also get the history and quick searches for filetypes. It does help with a lot of files. -- Joost
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:45:47 AM Pavel Volkov wrote: On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 1:32:48 AM MSK, Mick wrote: I agree with Neil. I can't really see what Dolphin offers that Konqueror didn't already have. It has Git and Mercurial plugins and split view. Not that I actively use those features but Dolphin seems to be more responsive anyway. For tasks like re-organizing home directory (sorting large quantity of files) both are inconvenient, I use Krusader for such things. I tend to use a combination of Dolphin and MC (console-based) -- Joost
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:45:47 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote: I agree with Neil. I can't really see what Dolphin offers that Konqueror didn't already have. It has Git and Mercurial plugins and split view. Not that I actively use those features but Dolphin seems to be more responsive anyway. If those are implemented using KParts, they will be available to Konqueror in file manager mode too. -- Neil Bothwick He's dead, Jim. You get his phaser, I'll grab his wallet. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5?
On 10/08/2014 07:31 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: so after spending hours fighting to upgrade boost, I finally got to the point were portage let me emerge kde-framework. I went to bed. I woke up 2h later... only 9 packages were installed, the rest skipped because of wrong gcc. Crap like that should be told right at the start. This is carryover from KDE 4. In all packages except kdelibs, the GCC check was in pkg_setup instead of pkg_pretend to save time during dependency resolution (think emerging 300 KDE packages at once). I did some quick tests and I'm not convinced that the small time saving justifies bending the rules and causing the sort of issue you ran into.
Re: [gentoo-user] Moving the portage tree to /var
On 10/7/2014 5:56 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to configure it. Ok, did I miss a news item on this? Is this discussed in detail somewhere?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5?
Am 08.10.2014 um 11:56 schrieb Michael Palimaka: On 10/08/2014 07:31 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: so after spending hours fighting to upgrade boost, I finally got to the point were portage let me emerge kde-framework. I went to bed. I woke up 2h later... only 9 packages were installed, the rest skipped because of wrong gcc. Crap like that should be told right at the start. This is carryover from KDE 4. In all packages except kdelibs, the GCC check was in pkg_setup instead of pkg_pretend to save time during dependency resolution (think emerging 300 KDE packages at once). I did some quick tests and I'm not convinced that the small time saving justifies bending the rules and causing the sort of issue you ran into. luckily, I did have gcc 4.8 installed, until now I just did not have a reason to switch. Afterwards emerging the rest was a non-issue. emerge @preserved-rebuild is not happy, of course because of kactivities-4 and -5 not liking each other.. let them be unhappy...
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
On 10/07/2014 09:42 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: Are you talking about the behaviour when you actually click on the foldername, instead of the? If yes, then that is as designed. No, I'm clicking on the . Sometimes I've expanded folders three to four levels deep and so it selects completely unrelated folders and files, as it selects everything from where I've clicked to the top of the list. It's really annoying, do you know if that feature be turned off? Dan
