[gentoo-user] journald writing errors in tty

2017-01-31 Thread Daniel Frey 
Does anyone know how to stop journald from writing errors all over my
terminal?

I've never seen this before. The error message shows up in dmesg as it's
supposed to but it also writes it whereever the cursor happens to be
which is extremely frustating.

I've set ForwardToWall=no and ForwardToConsole=no in
/etc/systemd/journald.conf but it has no effect.

Dan

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread J. Roeleveld 
On February 1, 2017 1:59:27 AM GMT+01:00, Neil Bothwick  
wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to
>> > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news
>item).
>> > You need to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into
>> > @world, which you can do with:
>> > 
>> >   emerge --deselect y $(qlist -IC dev-perl)  
>> 
>> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all
>
>You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your
>world
>file before you update perl.

Perl-cleaner does the cleansing as well these days. Which is extremely 
convenient.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] intel-microcode with systemd

2017-01-31 Thread Mick 
On Wednesday 01 Feb 2017 00:55:01 Marc Joliet wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2017 13:51:39 Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I am trying out a systemd installation on a MackBook Pro and I am not sure
> > the documentation on systemd + microcode is entirely correct.  So, I read
> > here:
> > 
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Intel_microcode#systemd
> > 
> > that the "microcode loader is set as a module in the kernel
> > configuration".
> > However, my kernel configuration is not offering this option.  Both 'CPU
> > microcode loading support' and 'Intel microcode loading support' can only
> > be set as built in elements.  I am not using an initramfs (yet) so I
> > wonder how I should go about this.
> 
> AIUI these days the microcode is supposed to be put in the initramfs and
> loaded from there during early boot (I read this somewhere, but don't
> remember where).  Dracut takes care of this, e.g., the initramfs on my
> laptop contains a microcode blob:
> 
> # lsinitrd /boot/initramfs-4.9.6-gentoo.img|grep -i micro
> drwxr-xr-x   1 root root0 Jan 27 01:14 kernel/x86/microcode
> -rw-r--r--   1 root root   983040 Jan 27 01:14
> kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
> 
> The third journal entry on said laptop is then:
> 
> Jan 30 20:42:17 localhost kernel: microcode: microcode updated early to
> revision 0x4, date = 2013-06-28
> 
> So it looks to me like the kernel loads it autonomously, and the reason to
> put the file in the initramfs is for the microcode to get updated as early
> as possible (before the kernel has to read from disk).
> 
> HTH

Thanks Marc, I did read the same in the Wiki, where it also mentioned that 
with systemd all you need to do is mark the microcode as modules in the kernel 
and systemd will load them at boot time.  I did try (twice) to generate a cpio 
with the blob, but the initrd wouldn't allow the efi stub to boot for some 
reason.  I will revisit this in the next day or two and see if it can work 
better this time.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Incredible Attack from Mars! Emerge monsters towards earth to strike again!

2017-01-31 Thread J. Roeleveld 
On February 1, 2017 6:48:25 AM GMT+01:00, Alan McKinnon 
 wrote:
>On 01/02/2017 05:10, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> okay, "it's back!"
>> 
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
>>
>">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-)]".
>> (dependency required by "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo"
>> [ebuild])
>> (dependency required by "dev-python/numpy-1.10.4::gentoo"
>[installed])
>> (dependency required by "media-libs/opencv-2.4.13::gentoo[python]"
>> [installed])
>> (dependency required by "media-gfx/gmic-1.7.9::gentoo[opencv]"
>> [installed])
>> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
>> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
>> [1]10945 exit 1 emerge --update --newuse --deep
>--with-bdeps=y
>> --tree --keep-going  -v  
>> 
>> 
>> I had this or a very similar error message before and thought I had
>> fixed it by removing this from package.use/.  :
>> 
>> dev-python/setuptools python_targets_python3_5
>> 
>> Then another hickup let me enabling this line again...and BOOM!
>> The above error message stroke again!
>> 
>> I can emerge six alone without problems:
>> 
>> [I] dev-python/six
>>  Available versions:  1.10.0 {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3
>python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
>>  Installed versions:  1.10.0(03:03:13 02/01/17)(-doc -test
>PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_4 -python3_5")
>>  Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six
>https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six
>>  Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library
>> 
>> and it is installed.
>> 
>> I have no idea what triggers this error message and to be honest I am
>> not really ue what it is trying to tell me.
>> By far my marsian isn't that good as my english...and take a look how
>> horrible THAT is... ;)
>> 
>> Who tals marsian and is willing to translate ;)
>
>Your python targets seems off.
>Remove all occurences of python targets and python single targets in
>make.conf, leave the decision to portage and the profile.

Don't forget to remove them from package.use and anywhere else you might have 
put them.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Incredible Attack from Mars! Emerge monsters towards earth to strike again!

2017-01-31 Thread Alan McKinnon 
On 01/02/2017 05:10, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> okay, "it's back!"
> 
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> ">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-)]".
> (dependency required by "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo"
> [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "dev-python/numpy-1.10.4::gentoo" [installed])
> (dependency required by "media-libs/opencv-2.4.13::gentoo[python]"
> [installed])
> (dependency required by "media-gfx/gmic-1.7.9::gentoo[opencv]"
> [installed])
> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> [1]10945 exit 1 emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y
> --tree --keep-going  -v  
> 
> 
> I had this or a very similar error message before and thought I had
> fixed it by removing this from package.use/.  :
> 
> dev-python/setuptools python_targets_python3_5
> 
> Then another hickup let me enabling this line again...and BOOM!
> The above error message stroke again!
> 
> I can emerge six alone without problems:
> 
> [I] dev-python/six
>  Available versions:  1.10.0 {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3 
> python2_7 python3_4 python3_5"}
>  Installed versions:  1.10.0(03:03:13 02/01/17)(-doc -test 
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_4 -python3_5")
>  Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six 
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six
>  Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library
> 
> and it is installed.
> 
> I have no idea what triggers this error message and to be honest I am
> not really ue what it is trying to tell me.
> By far my marsian isn't that good as my english...and take a look how
> horrible THAT is... ;)
> 
> Who tals marsian and is willing to translate ;)

Your python targets seems off.
Remove all occurences of python targets and python single targets in
make.conf, leave the decision to portage and the profile.

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] Incredible Attack from Mars! Emerge monsters towards earth to strike again!

2017-01-31 Thread Meino . Cramer 
Hi,

okay, "it's back!"

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
">=dev-python/six-1.10.0[python_targets_pypy(-)?,python_targets_pypy3(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_4(-)?,python_targets_python3_5(-)?,-python_single_target_pypy(-),-python_single_target_pypy3(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_4(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-)]".
(dependency required by "dev-python/setuptools-34.0.2-r1::gentoo"
[ebuild])
(dependency required by "dev-python/numpy-1.10.4::gentoo" [installed])
(dependency required by "media-libs/opencv-2.4.13::gentoo[python]"
[installed])
(dependency required by "media-gfx/gmic-1.7.9::gentoo[opencv]"
[installed])
(dependency required by "@selected" [set])
(dependency required by "@world" [argument])
[1]10945 exit 1 emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y
--tree --keep-going  -v  


I had this or a very similar error message before and thought I had
fixed it by removing this from package.use/.  :

dev-python/setuptools python_targets_python3_5

Then another hickup let me enabling this line again...and BOOM!
The above error message stroke again!

I can emerge six alone without problems:

[I] dev-python/six
 Available versions:  1.10.0 {doc test PYTHON_TARGETS="pypy pypy3 python2_7 
python3_4 python3_5"}
 Installed versions:  1.10.0(03:03:13 02/01/17)(-doc -test 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 -pypy -pypy3 -python3_4 -python3_5")
 Homepage:https://bitbucket.org/gutworth/six 
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six
 Description: Python 2 and 3 compatibility library

and it is installed.

I have no idea what triggers this error message and to be honest I am
not really ue what it is trying to tell me.
By far my marsian isn't that good as my english...and take a look how
horrible THAT is... ;)

Who tals marsian and is willing to translate ;)

Cheers
Meino

PS> Would be nice to make such error message more consumer
compatible...not everyone is a dev...

[SOLVED] Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL is causing me angst

2017-01-31 Thread Andrew Lowe 

On 21/01/17 05:15, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:

Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017, 16:36:21 CET schrieb Andrew Lowe:

Dear all,
Just done an eix-sync -> emerge -NuD world and have a problem with the
above mentioned package. As a quick first pass before I put all the
error/debugging stuff together, does anyone know what the following
snippet would mean, I'm totally Perl ignorant?

  * perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr INSTALLDIRS=vendor INSTALLMAN3DIR=none
DESTDIR=/var/tmp/portage/dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL-2.43.0/image/
perl: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.24.1/x86_64-linux/auto/Net/SSLeay/SSLeay.so:
undefined symbol: SSLeay_version
  * ERROR: dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL-2.43.0::gentoo failed (configure phase):
  *   Unable to build!

According to packages.gentoo.org, I've got the latest version of
Net-SSLeay, 1.8


Please file a bug, and add your whole build log and the output of
"emerge --info" there. Then we can investigate more...





	I masked this, when I originally asked the question, unmasked this 
morning and now all is good. No idea what I/the system/portage changed 
but it now compiled. Now it's busybox causing trouble.


Andrew

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread Neil Bothwick 
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

> > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to
> > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news item).
> > You need to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into
> > @world, which you can do with:
> > 
> >   emerge --deselect y $(qlist -IC dev-perl)  
> 
> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all

You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your world
file before you update perl.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on the earth.


pgp59zXp7K_b_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread thelma 
On 01/31/2017 05:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>> How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these
>> dependencies. 
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>>
>> dev-lang/perl:0
>>
>>   (dev-lang/perl-5.22.3_rc4:0/5.22::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>> pulled in by =dev-lang/perl-5.22* required by
>> (virtual/perl-Digest-1.170.0-r5:0/0::gentoo, installed) ^
>> ^ (and 10 more with the same problem)
>>
>>   (dev-lang/perl-5.20.2:0/5.20::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>> =dev-lang/perl-5.20.2* required by
>> (virtual/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280.217-r2:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>> ^  ^^^ dev-lang/perl:0/5.20=[-build(-)] required by
>> (dev-perl/Net-SMTP-SSL-1.30.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>>  (and 117 more with the same problems)
> 
> A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to part
> of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news item). You need
> to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into @world, which
> you can do with:
> 
>   emerge --deselect y $(qlist -IC dev-perl)

I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread Neil Bothwick 
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

> How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these
> dependencies. 
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
> 
> dev-lang/perl:0
> 
>   (dev-lang/perl-5.22.3_rc4:0/5.22::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by =dev-lang/perl-5.22* required by
> (virtual/perl-Digest-1.170.0-r5:0/0::gentoo, installed) ^
> ^ (and 10 more with the same problem)
> 
>   (dev-lang/perl-5.20.2:0/5.20::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> =dev-lang/perl-5.20.2* required by
> (virtual/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280.217-r2:0/0::gentoo, installed)
> ^  ^^^ dev-lang/perl:0/5.20=[-build(-)] required by
> (dev-perl/Net-SMTP-SSL-1.30.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>  (and 117 more with the same problems)

A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to part
of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news item). You need
to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into @world, which
you can do with:

  emerge --deselect y $(qlist -IC dev-perl)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If at first you don't suceed, try the switch marked "Power"


pgpI5aGFCVZAZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread thelma 
On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
>> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
>> --exclude dev-ruby/racc  world
>>
>> I'm getting another error:
> 
> Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at once, drop the -D
> and -N flags.
> 
> Why are you using both the --verbose and --quiet switches?


How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these 
dependencies.
 
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

dev-lang/perl:0

  (dev-lang/perl-5.22.3_rc4:0/5.22::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled 
in by
=dev-lang/perl-5.22* required by 
(virtual/perl-Digest-1.170.0-r5:0/0::gentoo, installed)
^  ^
   
(and 10 more with the same problem)

  (dev-lang/perl-5.20.2:0/5.20::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
=dev-lang/perl-5.20.2* required by 
(virtual/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280.217-r2:0/0::gentoo, installed)
^  ^^^  

  
dev-lang/perl:0/5.20=[-build(-)] required by 
(dev-perl/Net-SMTP-SSL-1.30.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)
    
  
(and 117 more with the same problems)

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread thelma 
On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> 
>> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
>> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
>> --exclude dev-ruby/racc  world
>>
>> I'm getting another error:
> 
> Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at once, drop the -D
> and -N flags.
> 
> Why are you using both the --verbose and --quiet switches?

I solve this one by switching to rubby-21
eselect ruby list
Available Ruby profiles:
  [1]   ruby20 (with Rubygems)
  [2]   ruby21 (with Rubygems) *

and "dev-ruby/racc" compile just fine.

Thanks for suggestion on dropping -D and -N flags, good idea.

--
Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] intel-microcode with systemd

2017-01-31 Thread Marc Joliet 
On Sunday 29 January 2017 13:51:39 Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying out a systemd installation on a MackBook Pro and I am not sure
> the documentation on systemd + microcode is entirely correct.  So, I read
> here:
> 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Intel_microcode#systemd
> 
> that the "microcode loader is set as a module in the kernel configuration".
> However, my kernel configuration is not offering this option.  Both 'CPU
> microcode loading support' and 'Intel microcode loading support' can only be
> set as built in elements.  I am not using an initramfs (yet) so I wonder
> how I should go about this.

AIUI these days the microcode is supposed to be put in the initramfs and 
loaded from there during early boot (I read this somewhere, but don't remember 
where).  Dracut takes care of this, e.g., the initramfs on my laptop contains 
a microcode blob:

# lsinitrd /boot/initramfs-4.9.6-gentoo.img|grep -i micro
drwxr-xr-x   1 root root0 Jan 27 01:14 kernel/x86/microcode
-rw-r--r--   1 root root   983040 Jan 27 01:14 
kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin

The third journal entry on said laptop is then:

Jan 30 20:42:17 localhost kernel: microcode: microcode updated early to 
revision 0x4, date = 2013-06-28

So it looks to me like the kernel loads it autonomously, and the reason to put 
the file in the initramfs is for the microcode to get updated as early as 
possible (before the kernel has to read from disk).

HTH
-- 
Marc Joliet
--
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread Neil Bothwick 
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost
> --exclude dev-ruby/racc  world
> 
> I'm getting another error:

Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at once, drop the -D
and -N flags.

Why are you using both the --verbose and --quiet switches?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

My Go this  amn keyboar  oesn't have any  's.


pgpU3e30VB7nb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

2017-01-31 Thread thelma 
On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months).
[snip]

I got stuck on "dev-ruby/racc"

>>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11, Log file:
>>>  '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.4.11:20170131-232501.log'
>>> Jobs: 133 of 366 complete, 1 failed Load avg: 1.10, 1.21, 1.31
*** Resuming merge...
 * Package:dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11
 * Repository: gentoo
 * Maintainer: r...@gentoo.org
 * USE:abi_x86_32 elibc_glibc kernel_linux ruby_targets_ruby21 
userland_GNU x86
 * FEATURES:   preserve-libs sandbox userpriv usersandbox
>>> cfg-update-1.8.2-r1: Skipping checksum index updating...
 * Running unpack phase for all ...
 * Unpacking .gem file... ...
 [ ok ]
 * Uncompressing metadata ...
 [ ok ]
 * Unpacking data.tar.gz ...
 [ ok ]
 * Running prepare phase for all ...
 * Running source copy phase for ruby21 ...
 * Running prepare phase for ruby21 ...
checking for rb_ary_subseq()... *** extconf.rb failed ***
Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of necessary
libraries and/or headers.  Check the mkmf.log file for more details.  You may
need configuration options.

Provided configuration options:
--with-opt-dir
--without-opt-dir
--with-opt-include
--without-opt-include=${opt-dir}/include
--with-opt-lib
--without-opt-lib=${opt-dir}/lib
--with-make-prog
--without-make-prog
--srcdir=.
--curdir
--ruby=/usr/bin/ruby21
/usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:456:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an 
executable file. (RuntimeError)
You have to install development tools first.
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:541:in `try_link0'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:556:in `try_link'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:736:in `try_func'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:1021:in `block in have_func'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:912:in `block in checking_for'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:351:in `block (2 levels) in postpone'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:321:in `open'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:351:in `block in postpone'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:321:in `open'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:347:in `postpone'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:911:in `checking_for'
from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/mkmf.rb:1020:in `have_func'
from extconf.rb:5:in `'
 * ERROR: dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11::gentoo failed (prepare phase):
 *   (no error message)
 * 
 * Call stack:
 * ebuild.sh, line  115:  Called src_prepare
 *   environment, line 4446:  Called ruby-ng_src_prepare
 *   environment, line 4156:  Called _ruby_each_implementation 
'each_ruby_prepare'
 *   environment, line  446:  Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'ruby21' 
'each_ruby_prepare'
 *   environment, line  549:  Called each_ruby_prepare
 *   environment, line  867:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *   ${RUBY} -Cext/racc extconf.rb || die
 * 
 * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info 
'=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11::gentoo'`,
 * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv 
'=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11::gentoo'`.
!!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information:
GENTOO_VM=  CLASSPATH="" JAVA_HOME="/etc/java-config-2/current-system-vm"
JAVACFLAGS="" COMPILER=""
and of course, the output of emerge --info =racc-1.4.11
 * The complete build log is located at 
'/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.4.11:20170131-232501.log'.
 * For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at 
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11/temp/build.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at 
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11/temp/environment'.
 * Working directory: 
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11/work/ruby21/racc-1.4.11'
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11/work/ruby21/racc-1.4.11'
 * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies:
 * 
 *   >=dev-ruby/json-1.7.7[ruby_targets_ruby20] pulled in by:
 * (dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p648:2.0/2.0::gentoo, installed)
 * 
 *   dev-lang/perl:0/5.20= pulled in by:
 * (virtual/perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5:0/0::gentoo, installed)
 * 
 *   virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby20] pulled in by:
 * (dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11:0/0::gentoo, installed)
 * 
 * The resume list contains packages that are either masked or have
 * unsatisfied dependencies. Please restart/continue the operation
 * manually, or use --skipfirst to skip the first package in the list and
 * any other packages that may be masked or have missing dependencies.

When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc:
emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost --exclude 
dev-ruby/racc  world

I'm getting another error:

!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulle

[gentoo-user] bash-completion question(s)

2017-01-31 Thread Corbin Bird 
The package "sys-boot/grub:2" popped this warning during updates :

> Problems with installed bash completions were found:
>
> grub: 'have' command is deprecated and must not be used.
> grub: incorrect name, no completions for 'grub' command defined.
> grub-mkconfig: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-mkpasswd-pbkdf2: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-mkrescue: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-reboot: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-editenv: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-set-default: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-mkimage: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-sparc64-setup: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-bios-setup: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-script-check: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-probe: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-mkfont: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.
> grub-install: missing alias (symlink) for completed command.

No "grub" entries found at all in "/usr/share/bash-completions".

Is it correct to assume any "bash-completions" are strictly personal
choice and NOT technically required?

Re: [gentoo-user] Bootloaders: SILENT CRISIS!!!

2017-01-31 Thread Tom H 
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Mick  wrote:
> On Monday 30 Jan 2017 06:10:47 Tom H wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK, since the advent of defaulting to CoreStorage (OS X 10.10? - OS
>> X's equivalent of LVM) and full-disk encryption (OS X 10.10?),
>> bootx64.efi/boot.efi cannot be loaded from disk0s2.
>
> I suspect you're right ...
>
> This is what my MBP EFI reports:
>
> # efibootmgr -v
> BootCurrent: 
> Timeout: 5 seconds
> BootOrder: ,0080
> Boot* Gentoo-4.4.39-28_Jan HD(1,GPT,a28905fe-b74d-46b3-b68b-
> ee342a73f72b,0x28,0x64000)/File(\EFI\LINUX\bootx64-4.4.39-gentoo.efi)
> Boot0080* Mac OS X
> PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x4)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,15fd7906-
> a899-4912-b52b-3e034f7a62ea,0xdcfa748,0x135f20)
> Boot0081* Mac OS X
> PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x4)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,15fd7906-
> a899-4912-b52b-3e034f7a62ea,0xdcfa748,0x135f20)
> Boot0082*
> PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x4)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(3,GPT,15fd7906-
> a899-4912-b52b-3e034f7a62ea,0xdcfa748,0x135f20)
> Boot*
> PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1c,0x4)/Pci(0x0,0x0)/Sata(0,0,0)/HD(2,GPT,41293e5b-9bdc-405a-
> ba22-5ece4b11f91e,0x64028,0x1bb18c80)/File(\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi)
>
> Both Boot0080 and Boot0081 are on the 3 partition. Boot points to the
> \System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi file on the 2nd partition. However, 
> there
> same path and file also exists on the 3rd partition, but as you mention the 
> 3rd
> partition is unencrypted.

On my MacBook, bought in December, un-upgraded and un-linuxed:

# nvram -p | grep efi-boot-device
efi-boot-device
IOMatchIOProviderClassIOMediaIOPropertyMatchUUIDB6F965B2-2CF9-4A9E-85EA-544300583A35BLLastBSDNamedisk0s3%00
efi-boot-device-data
%02%01%0c%00%d0A%03%0a%00%00%00%00%01%01%06%00%00%1c%01%01%06%00%00%00%03%16%10%00%01%00%00%00%f9
%16X7%02%05%00%04%01*%00%03%00%00%00,BE%07%00%00%00%00%e4k%02%00%00%00%00%00%b2e%f9%b6%f9,%9eJ%85%eaTC%00X:5%02%02%7f%ff%04%00
#

Re: [gentoo-user] How often do you reboot?

2017-01-31 Thread Neil Bothwick 
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:50:02 -0600, Dale wrote:

> Leave it to me to find something weird.  o_O 

We do ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by moving to where you
can't find them.


pgpgmUHeUSdI0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature