[gentoo-user] AMD Tonga + kernel 4.19 broken
For me; Oct 25 15:34:51 phat kernel: fbcon: amdgpudrmfb (fb0) is primary device Oct 25 15:34:51 phat kernel: amdgpu: [powerplay] failed to send message 148 ret is 0 Oct 25 15:34:51 phat kernel: amdgpu: [powerplay] last message was failed ret is 0 Oct 25 15:34:51 phat kernel: amdgpu: [powerplay] failed to send message 145 ret is 0 Oct 25 15:34:51 phat kernel: amdgpu: [powerplay] last message was failed ret is 0 This was with linux-firmware-20181001. Have also tried linux-firmware-20181026, which has Tonga updates, but similar blank screen (didnt check logs). Judging by search hits on the messages it may be a kernel regression. Is this combination working for anyone?
Re: [gentoo-user] portage sandbox path-depth limit ?
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 03:09:51 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:29:59 +0100 Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > > > > Den 30. okt. 2018 10:01, skrev Mick: [...] > > Memory should not be a problem here. Fails with only that one emerge > > running, > > succeeds if run directly as root, or with FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox". > > > > Memory is >14GB: > > # vmstat > > procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- > > --cpu- > > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy > > id wa st > > 3 4 28416 6904608 174112 4616144 0 0 65 266 13 4 10 > > 2 84 4 0 > > It is possible that you hit directory loop. What lstree says on > that dir? Anyway, report this to sandbox devs. Sorry, `tree -l | grep recursive`. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgp9Aq8W9_0U6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.27 is broken
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 12:27:52 -0600 the wrote: > Hello, > > I have upgraded to sys-libs/glibc-2.27-r6 > and it broke the system. > > I can't even compile a hello world test program in c. > > I always get the following linking error: > > $ gcc main.c -o main.elf > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../lib64/crtn.o(a.debug_info+0x10003): > reloc against `*UND*': error 4 > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > When I try to install something it fails during configuration at > compiler sanity check. Try to get binary glibc, binutils and gcc packages from a recent starge3 image, and then rebuild your @system set. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgpBJBBbhDwJU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] portage sandbox path-depth limit ?
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:29:59 +0100 Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > > Den 30. okt. 2018 10:01, skrev Mick: > > On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 06:30:23 GMT Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > >> I'm having fun enabling "test" in FEATURES on my gentoo-desktop. One > >> interesting failure, that brings to mind build failures I have had in > >> the past: > >> > >> Building sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2, I get > >> > >> 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy FAILED > >> (updatedb.at:261) > >> > >> Trying to reproduce, as root I do "make check" in the work/mlocate-0.26/ > >> , and the test passes. > >> > >> 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy ok > >> > >> I'd really like to get to the bottom of this, as I believe it must have > >> the same root-cause as issues I have had compiling large packages such > >> as firefox. > >> > >> Re-running both the emerge and the make check, I get the same results. > >> emerge fails, make check succeeds. I made a local copy of the ebuild and > >> inserted a "ulimit -a" in pre_src_test. > >> > >> ulimit from root-shell: > >> > >> # ulimit -a > >> core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > >> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > >> scheduling priority (-e) 0 > >> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited > >> pending signals (-i) 59958 > >> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 > >> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited > >> open files (-n) 1024 > >> pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 > >> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 > >> real-time priority (-r) 0 > >> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 > >> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited > >> max user processes (-u) 1 > >> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited > >> file locks (-x) unlimited > >> > >> ulimit from emerge: > > Source compiled. > >> core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > >> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > >> scheduling priority (-e) 0 > >> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited > >> pending signals (-i) 59958 > >> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 > >> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited > >> open files (-n) 1024 > >> pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 > >> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 > >> real-time priority (-r) 0 > >> stack size (kbytes, -s) 9788 > >> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited > >> max user processes (-u) 1 > >> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited > >> file locks (-x) unlimited > >> > > Test phase: sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2 > >> I have plenty of space in my portage temp directory (/pt): > >> > >> # df -hT ./ > >> Filsystem Type Størrelse Brukt Tilgj. Bruk% Montert på > >> /dev/xvdc ext4 163G 8,0G 147G6% /pt > >> > >> Portage temp is at /pt due to the earlier mentioned issues with firefox. > >> > >> At my wits end here. Anyone ? > > I have not looked or used the test FEATURES of portage, but have also > > noticed > > over time certain packages fail to build on machines with low RAM. As low > > here I consider anything less than 4G. It seems each thread is now > > consuming > > so much memory they cumulatively use up all RAM available and then start > > swapping endlessly until the compilation invariably fails. Increasingly > > more > > and more packages have been suffering from this, the last two I noticed are > > qtwebkit and qtwebengine. > > > > My solution has been to create a package.env file in which I specify > > MAKEOPTS > > limiting the number of jobs and average load for any of these packages > > which > > chew up all the RAM. > Memory should not be a problem here. Fails with only that one emerge > running, > succeeds if run directly as root, or with FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox". > > Memory is >14GB: > # vmstat > procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- > --cpu- > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy > id wa st > 3 4 28416 6904608 174112 4616144 0 0 65 266 13 4 10 > 2 84 4 0 It is possible that you hit directory loop. What lstree says on that dir? Anyway, report this to sandbox devs. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgpx97Wp8nVj1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Android studio emulator without PulseAudio
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:53:33 + Pouru Lasse wrote: > "Davyd McColl" writes: > > > Would apulse not do the trick? > > > > -d > > On 2018-10-30 11:15:14, Pouru Lasse wrote: > > > > Is it possible to run the emulator included with Android Studio without > > having PulseAudio installed? When I try to launch the emulator, it > > instantly crashes because it can't find libpulse.so.0. My QEMU package > > is compiled without PulseAudio, but Android SDK comes with its own > > version of QEMU. > > > > Setting QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none, as instructed in Android Studio manual, > > seems to have no effect, and the Gentoo wiki page on Android Studio just > > tells you to install PulseAudio. > > > > I don't mind having no audio at all, I just don't want to install > > PulseAudio. Any options? > > > > - Lasse > > I already had apulse installed, but apparently the emulator doesn't look > for the library in the right directory. I copied all the libpulse.* > files under ~/Android/Sdk/emulator/lib/ and > ~/Android/Sdk/emulator/lib64/ and now it seems to work. You should run emulator as: $ apulse command_to_run_emulator Or install the latest apulse with USE=sdk. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgp9kbzOwhr51.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Autoexecute when "returning" from sudo ?
On 10/31/2018 10:49 AM, Stefan Schmiedl wrote: You could also define a function like … and skip the extra script file. Agreed. Though I've found that scripts are nicer for some things, like remote command execution. ;-) -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: [gentoo-user] Autoexecute when "returning" from sudo ?
You could also define a function like
function surh() { sudo "$@" ; rehash ; }
in your ~/.zshrc and skip the extra script file.
s.
"tu...@posteo.de" , 31.10.2018, 16:36:
> Hi Anton,
> thank you very much ! :)
> Your solution creates the flat-hand-against-my-forehead
> effect... ;)
> Of course! Yes!
> Cheers!
> Meino
> On 10/31 07:37, Anton Molyboha wrote:
>> Hi, Meino
>>
>> I'd make a script, sudo_with_rehash:
>>
>> sudo "$@"
>> rehash
>>
>> and add to whatever is the equivalent of .bashrc for zsh:
>>
>> alias sudo="source sudo_with_rehash"
>>
>> Would that work for you?
>>
>> Best,
>> Anton
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:49 AM wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > often I have this scenario:
>> > I miss an application/script, a setting or something like that.
>> > To apply the modifikation I becom root from the shell I was using as user.
>> > I modificate/install or whatever change is needed...
>> > I CTRL-D back to my user shell.
>> >
>> > Now I have to do a "rehash" (I am using zsh) to make the change
>> > visible/accessible. Sometimes I forget that.
>> >
>> > So...is it possible to auto-execute a "rehash" or whatever is needed,
>> > when the user is comeing back from his alternate life as root?
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for any help in advance!
>> > Cheers!
>> > Meino
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
--
Stefan Schmiedl
EDV-Beratung Schmiedl, Berghangstr. 5, 93413 Cham
Büro: +49 (0) 9971 9966 989, Mobil: +49 (0) 160 9981 6278
Re: [gentoo-user] Autoexecute when "returning" from sudo ?
Hi Anton, thank you very much ! :) Your solution creates the flat-hand-against-my-forehead effect... ;) Of course! Yes! Cheers! Meino On 10/31 07:37, Anton Molyboha wrote: > Hi, Meino > > I'd make a script, sudo_with_rehash: > > sudo "$@" > rehash > > and add to whatever is the equivalent of .bashrc for zsh: > > alias sudo="source sudo_with_rehash" > > Would that work for you? > > Best, > Anton > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:49 AM wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > often I have this scenario: > > I miss an application/script, a setting or something like that. > > To apply the modifikation I becom root from the shell I was using as user. > > I modificate/install or whatever change is needed... > > I CTRL-D back to my user shell. > > > > Now I have to do a "rehash" (I am using zsh) to make the change > > visible/accessible. Sometimes I forget that. > > > > So...is it possible to auto-execute a "rehash" or whatever is needed, > > when the user is comeing back from his alternate life as root? > > > > Thanks a lot for any help in advance! > > Cheers! > > Meino > > > > > > > >
Re: [gentoo-user] Autoexecute when "returning" from sudo ?
Hi, Meino I'd make a script, sudo_with_rehash: sudo "$@" rehash and add to whatever is the equivalent of .bashrc for zsh: alias sudo="source sudo_with_rehash" Would that work for you? Best, Anton On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:49 AM wrote: > Hi, > > often I have this scenario: > I miss an application/script, a setting or something like that. > To apply the modifikation I becom root from the shell I was using as user. > I modificate/install or whatever change is needed... > I CTRL-D back to my user shell. > > Now I have to do a "rehash" (I am using zsh) to make the change > visible/accessible. Sometimes I forget that. > > So...is it possible to auto-execute a "rehash" or whatever is needed, > when the user is comeing back from his alternate life as root? > > Thanks a lot for any help in advance! > Cheers! > Meino > > > >
[gentoo-user] Autoexecute when "returning" from sudo ?
Hi, often I have this scenario: I miss an application/script, a setting or something like that. To apply the modifikation I becom root from the shell I was using as user. I modificate/install or whatever change is needed... I CTRL-D back to my user shell. Now I have to do a "rehash" (I am using zsh) to make the change visible/accessible. Sometimes I forget that. So...is it possible to auto-execute a "rehash" or whatever is needed, when the user is comeing back from his alternate life as root? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers! Meino
