[gentoo-user] cannot upgrade to zfs 0.8.x
Hi. I have discovered that I cannot upgrade to zfs 0.8.x. The problem seems to be that there is no sys-kernel/spl-0.8.x at all. I have seen on the zfs list that people are upgrading to 0.8, so what is happening here -- is this somehow another unmaintained package or someting? Thanks in advance for any ideas. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com
[gentoo-user] Upgrading to Qt 5.12.4 makes some applications invisible
Qt was upgraded from 5.12.3 to 5.12.4 and as a result some applications (Clementine and qBittorrent) become invisible when you minimize them and then restore them. They only become visible again when you resize their window, and resizing the window is very slow. This does not affect most applications. Dolphin, Kate/Kwrite, System Settings, SMPlayer, etc, all work fine. Rebuilding Clementine and qBittorrent didn't fix it. Rebuilding kde-frameworks and kde-plasma didn't fix it. Have anyone else encountered this?
Re: [gentoo-user] version of portaudio conflicts with itsself?
On 05/07/2019 22:05, Arve Barsnes wrote: > Portage would like to install portaudio-19.06.00-r2, but audacity > requires a version lower than that. I have the same output on my box, > waiting for an audacity release I guess. I have similar output especially with packages that are slotted like wine-mono: [U] app-emulation/wine-mono Available versions: (4.6.4) 4.6.4 (4.7.0) (~)4.7.0 (4.7.1) 4.7.1 (4.7.3) (~)4.7.3 (4.7.5) 4.7.5 (4.8.0) (~)4.8.0 (4.8.1) (~)4.8.1 (4.8.3) (~)4.8.3 (4.9.0) (~)4.9.0 Installed versions: 4.7.5(4.7.5)(13:55:46 28/01/19) Homepage: https://www.winehq.org/ Description: Wine Mono is a replacement for the .NET runtime and class libraries in Wine If I run an upgrade this never gets updated. My assumption is that the Wine ebuild is not requiring >wine-mono:4.7.5. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Fw: updating /etc/package.accept_keywords
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2019 08:20:49 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > There's also cfg-update and there may be more tools to manage changes > > > in config files following an update. > > > > > > The merge function is particularly useful, because you can see where > > > your edits are/not affected by any changes to the new config defaults > > > and reject/ accept one change at a time. > > > > Yeah, I couldn't live without cfg-update, especially with the > > auto-merging of changes. The one caveat is that it isn't the > > best-maintained piece of software out there. I'm mostly nursing it > > along. > > conf-update works best for me. It also can use colordiff to highlight > changes and can be configured to auto-merge trivial changes. Hi and sorry for being late to the party due to occasional lapses in my reading the list. But I wanted to throw my two pennies into the mix. I’ve never switched from etc-update which I used when I started out with Gentoo back in ye olden days. But when I started using vim for everything, I set my diff-tool to vimdiff. This allows me to import the new changes “my way” and merge them with my own customisations very easily. -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. Be excellent to each other. And party on, dudes! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Fdisk reports new HD as 10MiB
Wols Lists wrote: > On 07/07/19 02:12, Dale wrote: >> Wol's lists wrote: >>> >>> What about lsdrv (as per the raid wiki)? >>> >>> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Asking_for_help >>> >>> That handles pretty much everything. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Wol >>> >>> >> >> I don't have RAID so no idea. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> > lsdrv looks like lsblk, it's just that it handles afaik pretty much > everything - starts with the disk, then lists any partitions, any lvm's, > any raids, etc etc. > > Cheers, > Wol > > So if one has RAID software installed, there is a even better tool available. Nifty. lol Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Fdisk reports new HD as 10MiB
On 07/07/19 02:12, Dale wrote: > Wol's lists wrote: >> On 06/07/2019 15:56, Dale wrote: >>> Robin Atwood wrote: On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 09:11:22 +1000 Adam Carter wrote: >> OK panic over! I had shelled into the wrong system! The mystery is >> what I was trying to copy to, the machine only has one HD. >> > lsblk is nice > > $ lsblk > NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT > sda 8:00 931.5G 0 disk > └─sda18:10 931.5G 0 part /var > nvme0n1 259:00 477G 0 disk > ├─nvme0n1p1 259:10 1G 0 part > └─nvme0n1p2 259:20 476G 0 part / lsblk *is* nice, thanks! Robin >>> >>> >>> FYI, it also works when using LVM too. >>> >>> >>> root@fireball / # lsblk >>> NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT >>> sda 8:01 149.1G 0 disk >>> ├─sda1 8:11 384.3M 0 part /boot >>> ├─sda2 8:21 1K 0 part >>> ├─sda5 8:51 957M 0 part >>> ├─sda6 8:61 23.3G 0 part / >>> └─sda7 8:71 124.5G 0 part >>>├─OS-usr254:0035G 0 lvm /usr >>>├─OS-var254:1032G 0 lvm /var >>>└─OS-swap 254:2012G 0 lvm [SWAP] >>> sdb 8:16 1 2.7T 0 disk >>> └─sdb1 8:17 1 2.7T 0 part >>>└─Home2-Home2 254:30 8.2T 0 lvm /home >>> sdc 8:32 1 5.5T 0 disk >>> └─sdc1 8:33 1 5.5T 0 part >>>└─Home2-Home2 254:30 8.2T 0 lvm /home >>> sdd 8:48 1 698.7G 0 disk >>> └─sdd1 8:49 1 698.7G 0 part >>>└─backup-backup 254:40 698.6G 0 lvm /backup >>> sr011:01 3G 0 rom >>> root@fireball / # >>> >> What about lsdrv (as per the raid wiki)? >> >> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Asking_for_help >> >> That handles pretty much everything. >> >> Cheers, >> Wol >> >> > > > I don't have RAID so no idea. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > lsdrv looks like lsblk, it's just that it handles afaik pretty much everything - starts with the disk, then lists any partitions, any lvm's, any raids, etc etc. Cheers, Wol
