Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
inkscape-0.92.4 has the same issue. The problem is that the API (Programming interface, not Binary interface) between imagemagick-6 and imagemagick-7 isn't compatible. And inkscape never was updated to use the API from imagemagick-7. That's why you are forced to downgrade imagemagick to a version lower than 7 when you want to use imagemagick in inkscape. If you want to stay with imagemagick >=7 you have two options: 1) entirely disable imagemagick for inkscape, e.g. with "media-gfx/inkscape -imagemagick" in package.use 2) Use inkscape-1.0.0_beta1 and enable both USE-Flags "imagemagick graphicsmagick". That way you will get the imagemagick features through graphicsmagick, which means imagemagick is not a dependency of inkscape anymore. Regards Franz
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
Hello, On Sat, 30 Nov 2019, tu...@posteo.de wrote: >I got this printed onto my console after updateing: > > (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > conflicts with > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > >What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ? With an '<' in front of it (and it has), it means that inkscape-1.0_beta1 needs imagemagick <= 7 i.e. some 6.x version ... Basically it means you should mask that inkscape beta. Add e.g. =media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1 to /etc/portage/package.mask[/*]. Or (better) un-keyword ~amd64 inkscape, then you should stay at the (now) stable 0.92.4. HTH, -dnh -- We can use symlinks of course... syslogd would be a symlink to syslogp and ftpd and ircd would be linked to ftpp and ircp... and of course the point-to-point protocal paenguin. -- Kevin M. Bealer, commenting on the penguin Linux logo
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 05:45:48 +0100 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 11/29 10:28, Dale wrote: > > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 11/29 10:12, Dale wrote: > > >> tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > >>> (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild > > >>> scheduled for merge) conflicts with > > >>> > >>> (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for > > >>> merge) > > >>> > > >>> What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a > > >>> version ? Hi, man 5 ebuild tells us that: = Indicates that any slot value is acceptable. In addition, for runtime dependencies, indicates that the package will break unless a matching package with slot and sub-slot equal to the slot and sub-slot of the best installed version at the time the package was installed is available. In this it case means that inkscape wants the same slot version of imagemagick as it was present in the system at the time inkscape got emerged. So if you update imagemagick to a higher slot, inkscape will break and needs to be rebuilt. The rebuild should have been automatically scheduled by emerge. I am not sure why it did not but you have probably too many other conflicts and emerge got lost in that mess. ;-) It usually helps if you make all the USE flag and keyword changes that emerge wants you to do first. If it does not help then unmerge inkscape and emerge it again after update. > after switching this cxx-thingy off and on again, I get additional > errors: > > dev-python/numpy:0 > > (dev-python/numpy-1.17.4:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > conflicts with > dev-python/numpy[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)] > required by (media-libs/opencv-4.1.2:0/4.1.2::gentoo, installed) This looks like python is going to be updated. Again, try to make all the USE flags and keyword changes (they are usually printed at the end of emerge's error output). Then try to increase backtrack value with --backtrack parameter. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
On 11/29 10:28, Dale wrote:
> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > On 11/29 10:12, Dale wrote:
> >> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I got this printed onto my console after updateing:
> >>>
> >>> (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
> >>> merge) conflicts with
> >>> >>> (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> >>>
> >>> What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers!
> >>> Meino
> >>>
> >> I get this here:
> >>
> >>
> >> [ebuild R ] media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo USE="X
> >> bzip2 corefonts cxx fontconfig jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openmp pango
> >> png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -djvu -fftw -fpx -graphviz -hdri
> >> -heif -lqr -opencl -openexr -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs
> >> -test -webp" 0 KiB
> >>
> >>
> >> Notice the USE flag cxx is enabled. I think it is trying to say you
> >> need to enable that USE flag for that package. Portage's output can be
> >> confusing at times without a crystal ball or some other magic way to
> >> decipher what it says. lol
> >>
> >> Of course, I could be wrong on that too. :/
> >>
> >> Dale
> >>
> >> :-) :-)
> >>
> > Hi Dale,
> >
> > thank you for your posting! :)
> >
> > mine says:
> >
> > [U] media-gfx/imagemagick
> > Available versions: 6.9.10.74(0/6.9.10.74)^tu 7.0.9.5(0/7.0.9)^t
> > **(0/7.0.9)*l^t {X bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw fontconfig fpx
> > graphviz hdri heif jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl openexr openmp
> > pango perl png postscript q32 q8 raw static-libs svg test tiff truetype
> > webp wmf xml zlib}
> > Installed versions: 6.9.10.73(0/6.9.10.73)^t(04:05:19 AM
> > 11/23/2019)(X bzip2 cxx jpeg jpeg2k openmp png zlib -corefonts -djvu -fftw
> > -fontconfig -fpx -graphviz -hdri -heif -jbig -lcms -lqr -lzma -opencl
> > -openexr -pango -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs -svg -test
> > -tiff -truetype -webp -wmf -xml)
> >
> >
> > So "cxx" is already set. I will try to disable it, but it was not set
> > by me...so it may break other things.
> >
> > Could this not make a little bit clearer?
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Meino
> >
>
> Sometimes if it is set, it needs to be enabled for other packages it
> depends on as well if you want that option. On the other hand, if it is
> not set for the dependencies, then you need to turn it off for the
> package in question as well.
>
> It would be nice if it was clearer at times but we don't code the thing
> either. Usually, I trial and error it until I run out of ideas and then
> I post for someone with that crystal ball to help me with it. lol
>
> Of course, it could something else causing this too. There's a couple
> on here with a crystal ball so maybe they will help out if you don't
> find a solution soon.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Hi Dale,
after switching this cxx-thingy off and on again, I get additional
errors:
dev-python/numpy:0
(dev-python/numpy-1.17.4:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts
with
dev-python/numpy[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
required by (media-libs/opencv-4.1.2:0/4.1.2::gentoo, installed)
dev-python/numpy[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-)]
required by (app-arch/bloscpack-0.11.0:0/0::gentoo, installed)
dev-python/numpy[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
required by (dev-python/pygtk-2.24.0-r4:2/2::gentoo, installed)
dev-python/numpy[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]
required by (media-libs/aubio-0.4.9:0/5::gentoo, installed)
"Trial and error" should not be the base of fixing based on error
messages.
I think...
Cheers!
Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/29 10:12, Dale wrote:
>> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got this printed onto my console after updateing:
>>>
>>> (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
>>> merge) conflicts with
>>> >> (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>>>
>>> What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ?
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Meino
>>>
>> I get this here:
>>
>>
>> [ebuild R ] media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo USE="X
>> bzip2 corefonts cxx fontconfig jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openmp pango
>> png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -djvu -fftw -fpx -graphviz -hdri
>> -heif -lqr -opencl -openexr -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs
>> -test -webp" 0 KiB
>>
>>
>> Notice the USE flag cxx is enabled. I think it is trying to say you
>> need to enable that USE flag for that package. Portage's output can be
>> confusing at times without a crystal ball or some other magic way to
>> decipher what it says. lol
>>
>> Of course, I could be wrong on that too. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>>
> Hi Dale,
>
> thank you for your posting! :)
>
> mine says:
>
> [U] media-gfx/imagemagick
> Available versions: 6.9.10.74(0/6.9.10.74)^tu 7.0.9.5(0/7.0.9)^t
> **(0/7.0.9)*l^t {X bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw fontconfig fpx graphviz
> hdri heif jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl openexr openmp pango perl png
> postscript q32 q8 raw static-libs svg test tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib}
> Installed versions: 6.9.10.73(0/6.9.10.73)^t(04:05:19 AM 11/23/2019)(X
> bzip2 cxx jpeg jpeg2k openmp png zlib -corefonts -djvu -fftw -fontconfig -fpx
> -graphviz -hdri -heif -jbig -lcms -lqr -lzma -opencl -openexr -pango -perl
> -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs -svg -test -tiff -truetype -webp -wmf
> -xml)
>
>
> So "cxx" is already set. I will try to disable it, but it was not set
> by me...so it may break other things.
>
> Could this not make a little bit clearer?
>
> Cheers!
> Meino
>
Sometimes if it is set, it needs to be enabled for other packages it
depends on as well if you want that option. On the other hand, if it is
not set for the dependencies, then you need to turn it off for the
package in question as well.
It would be nice if it was clearer at times but we don't code the thing
either. Usually, I trial and error it until I run out of ideas and then
I post for someone with that crystal ball to help me with it. lol
Of course, it could something else causing this too. There's a couple
on here with a crystal ball so maybe they will help out if you don't
find a solution soon.
Dale
:-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
On 11/30 05:19, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 11/29 10:12, Dale wrote:
> > tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I got this printed onto my console after updateing:
> > >
> > > (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
> > > merge) conflicts with
> > > > > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> > >
> > > What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ?
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > > Meino
> > >
> >
> > I get this here:
> >
> >
> > [ebuild R ] media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo USE="X
> > bzip2 corefonts cxx fontconfig jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openmp pango
> > png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -djvu -fftw -fpx -graphviz -hdri
> > -heif -lqr -opencl -openexr -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs
> > -test -webp" 0 KiB
> >
> >
> > Notice the USE flag cxx is enabled. I think it is trying to say you
> > need to enable that USE flag for that package. Portage's output can be
> > confusing at times without a crystal ball or some other magic way to
> > decipher what it says. lol
> >
> > Of course, I could be wrong on that too. :/
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-) :-)
> >
>
> Hi Dale,
>
> thank you for your posting! :)
>
> mine says:
>
> [U] media-gfx/imagemagick
> Available versions: 6.9.10.74(0/6.9.10.74)^tu 7.0.9.5(0/7.0.9)^t
> **(0/7.0.9)*l^t {X bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw fontconfig fpx graphviz
> hdri heif jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl openexr openmp pango perl png
> postscript q32 q8 raw static-libs svg test tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib}
> Installed versions: 6.9.10.73(0/6.9.10.73)^t(04:05:19 AM 11/23/2019)(X
> bzip2 cxx jpeg jpeg2k openmp png zlib -corefonts -djvu -fftw -fontconfig -fpx
> -graphviz -hdri -heif -jbig -lcms -lqr -lzma -opencl -openexr -pango -perl
> -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs -svg -test -tiff -truetype -webp -wmf
> -xml)
>
>
> So "cxx" is already set. I will try to disable it, but it was not set
> by me...so it may break other things.
>
> Could this not make a little bit clearer?
>
> Cheers!
> Meino
>
>
No, that's not correct that way. Now it states:
The following packages are causing rebuilds:
(media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.10.74:0/6.9.10.74::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
merge) causes rebuilds for:
(media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
(see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
# required by media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1::gentoo[imagemagick,-graphicsmagick]
# required by @__auto_slot_operator_replace_installed__ (argument)
=media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.10.74 cxx
Hrrmmmp...
Cheers!
Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
On 11/29 10:12, Dale wrote:
> tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got this printed onto my console after updateing:
> >
> > (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
> > merge) conflicts with
> > > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> >
> > What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ?
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Meino
> >
>
> I get this here:
>
>
> [ebuild R ] media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo USE="X
> bzip2 corefonts cxx fontconfig jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openmp pango
> png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -djvu -fftw -fpx -graphviz -hdri
> -heif -lqr -opencl -openexr -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs
> -test -webp" 0 KiB
>
>
> Notice the USE flag cxx is enabled. I think it is trying to say you
> need to enable that USE flag for that package. Portage's output can be
> confusing at times without a crystal ball or some other magic way to
> decipher what it says. lol
>
> Of course, I could be wrong on that too. :/
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Hi Dale,
thank you for your posting! :)
mine says:
[U] media-gfx/imagemagick
Available versions: 6.9.10.74(0/6.9.10.74)^tu 7.0.9.5(0/7.0.9)^t
**(0/7.0.9)*l^t {X bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw fontconfig fpx graphviz
hdri heif jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl openexr openmp pango perl png
postscript q32 q8 raw static-libs svg test tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib}
Installed versions: 6.9.10.73(0/6.9.10.73)^t(04:05:19 AM 11/23/2019)(X
bzip2 cxx jpeg jpeg2k openmp png zlib -corefonts -djvu -fftw -fontconfig -fpx
-graphviz -hdri -heif -jbig -lcms -lqr -lzma -opencl -openexr -pango -perl
-postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs -svg -test -tiff -truetype -webp -wmf
-xml)
So "cxx" is already set. I will try to disable it, but it was not set
by me...so it may break other things.
Could this not make a little bit clearer?
Cheers!
Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > I got this printed onto my console after updateing: > > (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > conflicts with > (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > > What does "media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx]" indicate for a version ? > > Cheers! > Meino > I get this here: [ebuild R ] media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo USE="X bzip2 corefonts cxx fontconfig jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openmp pango png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -djvu -fftw -fpx -graphviz -hdri -heif -lqr -opencl -openexr -perl -postscript -q32 -q8 -raw -static-libs -test -webp" 0 KiB Notice the USE flag cxx is enabled. I think it is trying to say you need to enable that USE flag for that package. Portage's output can be confusing at times without a crystal ball or some other magic way to decipher what it says. lol Of course, I could be wrong on that too. :/ Dale :-) :-)
[gentoo-user] Conflicting version...but the version scheme is confusing...
Hi, I got this printed onto my console after updateing: (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.5:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: To all IPv6-slackers among the Gentoo community
Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Mick: > >> I have net-libs/libndp installed, but no ndp command ... where is it >> hiding? > Oh, I forgot that "ndp" is BSD Unix specific. On Gentoo, you can use > sys-apps/iproute2 tools, e.g. "ip -6 neigh" to inspect the kernel's > neighbour table. > >> PS. Thanks for your posts and links, at some point I will be replacing >> my aging router with a dual stack device and all this is good >> education for me. > My pleasure. I am actually surprised that this thread gained some > traction, instead of being wholly dismissed as networking nerdiness. > Go Gentoo users! ;-) > > -Ralph > > +1 I certainly learned a lot plus found a nice router out of it as well. Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: To all IPv6-slackers among the Gentoo community
* Ralph Seichter: > I just randomly picked [1] as a generator service [1] being https://cd34.com/rfc4193/ . I need more sleep, I really do. -Ralph
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: To all IPv6-slackers among the Gentoo community
* Mick: > I have net-libs/libndp installed, but no ndp command ... where is it > hiding? Oh, I forgot that "ndp" is BSD Unix specific. On Gentoo, you can use sys-apps/iproute2 tools, e.g. "ip -6 neigh" to inspect the kernel's neighbour table. > PS. Thanks for your posts and links, at some point I will be replacing > my aging router with a dual stack device and all this is good > education for me. My pleasure. I am actually surprised that this thread gained some traction, instead of being wholly dismissed as networking nerdiness. Go Gentoo users! ;-) -Ralph
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: To all IPv6-slackers among the Gentoo community
* Walter Dnes: > Assume the following [...] Pretty close. If you *really* want to set things up manually, I suggest using ULA as per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193 . I just randomly picked [1] as a generator service, entered a fictuous MAC address (you should use one of your own), and clicked "Go". The outcome was: Your Private IPv6 network is: fdb3:fa69:3947::/48 giving you access to the to the following /64s: fdb3:fa69:3947:0::/64 through fdb3:fa69:3947:::/64 The private /48 network contains 2^16 /64 subnets, so there is enough to go round for LAN, DMZ, guest network, etc. As an example, let's pick fdb3:fa69:3947:0::/64 as our local network. > machine1 has a script in /etc/local.d/ that executes... > ipv6 address fe80::1 link-local I prefer this alternative: # /etc/conf.d/net for machine #5 config_eth0="192.168.123.5/24 fdb3:fa69:3947::5/64" # The previous line is the shortened representation of # fdb3:fa69:3947:0:0:0:0:5/64 You can now indeed use a shared hosts file as before: # /etc/hosts 192.168.123.5 machine5-ipv4 fdb3:fa69:3947::5 machine5 I cannot test this right now, but if I did not miss any typos, this should get you going. -Ralph
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: To all IPv6-slackers among the Gentoo community
On Friday, 29 November 2019 01:08:39 GMT Ralph Seichter wrote: > * Walter Dnes: > > I prefer man pages to rambling Youtube videos. > > As you wish: man ndp ;-) Hmm ... $ man ndp No manual entry for ndp $ which ndp which: no ndp in (/usr/lib/llvm/8/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin) # which ndp which: no ndp in (/usr/lib/llvm/8/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/ sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/opt/bin) I have net-libs/libndp installed, but no ndp command ... where is it hiding? PS. Thanks for your posts and links, at some point I will be replacing my aging router with a dual stack device and all this is good education for me. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
