Re: [gentoo-user] problems running emerge @module-rebuild on new kernel
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:12:53PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > Just in case anyone runs into this problem, I solved by making sure my > umask was set to 002 and then I unmerged and re-emerged the kernel and > recompiled and all was well. It seems like re-emerging is the common solution here [1], as it effectively fixes any permission or timestamp issues. With that said, the problem should probably be reported in a more comprehensible manner than "Do not try to update included dependency files". [1] https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4039551.html -- Ashley Dixon suugaku.co.uk 2A9A 4117 DA96 D18A 8A7B B0D2 A30E BF25 F290 A8AA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] problems running emerge @module-rebuild on new kernel
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:48:45 -0400, Ashley Dixon wrote: > > [1 ] > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:42:25PM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > So, I then tried to do emerge @module-rebuild and got strange results. I > > get > > when emerging wireguard endlessly repeated lines like the following: > > # Do not try to update included dependency files > > and when I try to emerge sys-zfs/zfs-kmod it hangs on checking on whether > > modules can be rebuilt. > > Please attach the script of emerge, from the invocation (include the command) > to > when it starts to hang. Just in case anyone runs into this problem, I solved by making sure my umask was set to 002 and then I unmerged and re-emerged the kernel and recompiled and all was well. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] ABI_RISCV -> emerge wants to do heaps of work...
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:32:14 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote: > > I usually stick with -U (--changed-use) instead, when emerging world. > > This only rebuilds packages when the flags *change*. Give that a > > go. > > > > > > Ahh, I see now what's going on. The problem is that if I do a > "-uD" now, and get just the updates, it just "kicks the 290 further > down the road" until I next do an "-NuD", which if memory serves has > always been the recommended way of updating - according to the gentoo > wiki/doco. I might as well get it over and done with now... > > Yes, just tested. "-uD" -> just updates. "-NuD" -> updates + > 290 odd rebuilds. > -u is not the same as -U. The advice was to use -U instead of -N. Both look for USE flag changes, but -U only rebuilds if those changes affect your system. So use -uUD and all should be well. -- Neil Bothwick A real programmer never documents his code. It was hard to make, it should be hard to read pgpyVBXFqLrGv.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
