Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure?

2012-12-12 Thread design [depois das dez]
Can I recapitulate the routine? So it should be something like that:

layman -S
emerge --sync
emerge -DuN world
emerge @preserved-rebuild
emerge --depclean
revdep-rebuild
eclean distfiles -t=2w
eclean packages -t=2w
dispatch-conf
elogv

Right? But this script could not be run automatically because of
dispatch-conf that needs user intervention.


On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:36:10 -0600, Bruce Hill wrote:

  After using Gentoo for close to two years, the only time/place I've
  ever even seen @preserved-rebuild is in this thread. Yet you say,
  Portage will warn you when the set is [it] non-empty, telling you to
  run emerge @preserved-rebuild.
 
  How will portage do this?

 I've just got this after an emerge -u @world

 !!! existing preserved libs:
  package: dev-libs/icu-50.1-r2
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.49
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.49.1.2
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicuio.so.49
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicuio.so.49.1.2
  *  used by /usr/sbin/cgdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  used by /usr/sbin/gdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  used by /usr/sbin/sgdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.49
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.49.1.2
  *  used by /usr/sbin/cgdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  used by /usr/sbin/gdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  used by /usr/sbin/sgdisk (sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.5)
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.49
  *  - /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.49.1.2
 Use emerge @preserved-rebuild to rebuild packages using these libraries
  * After world updates, it is important to remove obsolete packages with
  * emerge --depclean. Refer to `man emerge` for more information.

 You won't see that because the subsequent programs run by your alias will
 scroll it out of view. The important point is that although the library
 update could have broken gptfdisk, it didn't because portage is holing
 onto the old library until I have run emerge @preserved-rebuild. Contrast
 this with the previous approach of letting emerge break important
 software and relying on revdep-rebuild to get it working again.


 --
 Neil Bothwick

 All things being equal, fat people use more soap.



Re: [gentoo-user] Old ATI Radeon RV350 driver broken after system update

2012-11-28 Thread design [depois das dez]
Jacques, you are the man! Thank you so much for your detailed explanation.
I had actually everything right, except the (y) for include in-kernel
firmware blobs in kernel binary, which I was advised some time ago of not
adding it. Why should I need that? I thought I was using the open-source
firmware when opted for sys-kernel/linux-firmware.

Mick and Clemente, thanks anyway for your attention as well.


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Jacques Montier jmont...@gmail.com wrote:



 2012/11/28 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com

 On Tuesday 27 Nov 2012 17:18:43 design [depois das dez] wrote:
  Fellow Gentooers,
 
  although I am very happy running a Gentoo box, sometimes I bump into
 some
  difficulties, esp. when updating packages. This time I am having a hard
  time reconfiguring my video card, which was fine but is not anymore
 after
  the last system update I've made. Gnome session goes up as usual but the
  resolution is not fine and monitor complains about not being in the
  recommended mode.
 
  My video driver is an ATI Radeon 9600 (RV350) and somebody has already
  updated the section on the Gentoo wiki
  http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Radeon#Kernels_.3E.3D3.0.0 informing
 that
  there might be incompatibilities concerning the RV350 firmware. I just
  don't have enough understanding of the video related parts of the
 system to
  tweak and fix this issue. How should I proceed when I have a problem of
  this sort?
 
  How do I know what is the video backend in my system? Is Xorg the only
 one
  possible? What can I do to fix this problem?

 The link you provided says that you should disable framebuffer in your
 kernel
 config.  Have you tried that?

 --
 Regards,
 Mick



 Hi,

 I have the same video card as yours (ATI 9600 RV350) on my old laptop and
 tried the new driver by enabling modesetting on radeon by default.
 Device Drivers - Graphic support - Direct Rendering Manager (y) - ATI
 Radeon (y) - Enable Modesetting on radeon by default (y).
 I installed the sys-kernel/linux-firmware package, and enabled  include
 in-kernel firmware blobs in kernel binary
 Device Drivers - Generic Driver Options - include in-kernel firmware
 blobs in kernel binary (y)
 I let empty External firmware blobs to build into the kernel binary.

 It did not work until i disabled ALL the drivers in Support for frame
 buffer devices.
 Device Drivers - Graphic support - Support for frame buffer devices.

 I hope that will help.

 Regards,

 --
 Jacques






[gentoo-user] Old ATI Radeon RV350 driver broken after system update

2012-11-27 Thread design [depois das dez]
Fellow Gentooers,

although I am very happy running a Gentoo box, sometimes I bump into some
difficulties, esp. when updating packages. This time I am having a hard
time reconfiguring my video card, which was fine but is not anymore after
the last system update I've made. Gnome session goes up as usual but the
resolution is not fine and monitor complains about not being in the
recommended mode.

My video driver is an ATI Radeon 9600 (RV350) and somebody has already
updated the section on the Gentoo wiki
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Radeon#Kernels_.3E.3D3.0.0 informing that
there might be incompatibilities concerning the RV350 firmware. I just
don't have enough understanding of the video related parts of the system to
tweak and fix this issue. How should I proceed when I have a problem of
this sort?

How do I know what is the video backend in my system? Is Xorg the only one
possible? What can I do to fix this problem?

Regards,
depoisdasdez