Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:56:44 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I use it without PAM, I don't have PAM installed. Just use passdb passwd { } passdb shadow { } to have it authenticate through /etc/passwd. I'm nit sure if both are needed, I'll have to try with just one. I don't know why I had both enabled to start with, but you only need the shadow entry. -- Neil Bothwick Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional!! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fishing around for a pop3 server I settled on dovecot. After installation and few changes in well commented config. I get a show stopping error when attempting startup. ( not really commentary just apologizing for the stupid subject which was supposed to have been: Subject: Dovecot... is this bugzilla material? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with dovecot. I get this when a connection is attempted: dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:52 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:57 Info: pop3-login: Disconnected: rip=192.168.0.16, lip=192.168.0.4 dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:57 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented dovecot: Jun 27 13:08:02 Info: pop3-login: Disconnected: rip=192.168.0.16, lip=192.168.0.4 dovecot: Jun 27 13:08:03 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented Apparently has something to do with glibc and how it is compiled judging by the message on gmane: (This line will probably wrap so be alerted if you want to use it) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/13106/match=failed+function+implemented -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 18:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with dovecot. I get this when a connection is attempted: dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:52 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented Just a guess, but: check your kernel config. See if CONFIG_INOTIFY is set. If not, recompile with that set and see if it behaves better. Josh -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:18:24 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently has something to do with glibc and how it is compiled judging by the message on gmane: (This line will probably wrap so be alerted if you want to use it) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/13106/match=failed+function+implemented Reading that thread, it would appear that for this to happen you have to have installed =linux-headers-2.6.16 but not recompiled glibc. Check the dates from genlop glibc genlop linux-headers If the former is earlier, re-emerge it. -- Neil Bothwick Man and mouse are alike, both end up in pussy :) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 21:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you emerge dovecot with the pop3d USE flag? Nope and Jean has explained a bit about that... sorry for the line noise Looks to be not the end of the troubles with dovecot. I get this when a connection is attempted: dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:52 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:57 Info: pop3-login: Disconnected: rip=192.168.0.16, lip=192.168.0.4 dovecot: Jun 27 13:07:57 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented dovecot: Jun 27 13:08:02 Info: pop3-login: Disconnected: rip=192.168.0.16, lip=192.168.0.4 dovecot: Jun 27 13:08:03 Error: pop3-login: inotify_init() failed: Function not implemented Apparently has something to do with glibc and how it is compiled judging by the message on gmane: (This line will probably wrap so be alerted if you want to use it) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/13106/match=failed+functio n+implemented i got rid of it removing 'login' from authentications mechanisms in /etc/dovecot.conf section auth_default { mechanism = plain I have single user setup and I dont care much about security here, so maybe this isnt the best solution. I use dovecot with squirrelmail to read one filtered kmail maildir. martins -- Linux 2.6.17-ck1 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ 22:20:30 up 13:47, 1 user, load average: 0.49, 0.44, 0.49 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
Martins Steinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i got rid of it removing 'login' from authentications mechanisms in /etc/dovecot.conf section auth_default { mechanism = plain I have single user setup and I dont care much about security here, so maybe this isnt the best solution. I use dovecot with squirrelmail to read one filtered kmail maildir. My setup is very similar ... no great need for security. My setting is the same as what you posted but then the pam stuff is in there too. What does your whole auth_default {} look like? (Everthing between opening and closing brackets) Here, the whole thing minus the comments is: auth default { mechanisms = plain passdb pam { args = * } userdb passwd { } user = root } I don't know how much of that is needed. I wouldn't care if pam was bypassed too but not sure if it would work then. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
Josh Helmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just a guess, but: check your kernel config. See if CONFIG_INOTIFY is set. If not, recompile with that set and see if it behaves better. Its set: root # grep CONFIG_INOTIFY .config CONFIG_INOTIFY=y -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reading that thread, it would appear that for this to happen you have to have installed =linux-headers-2.6.16 but not recompiled glibc. Check the dates from genlop glibc genlop linux-headers If the former is earlier, re-emerge it. Doesn't appear to hold here. root # genlop glibc * sys-libs/glibc Wed Jun 14 16:27:01 2006 sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r3 root # genlop linux-headers * sys-kernel/linux-headers Wed Jun 14 09:08:10 2006 sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.11-r5 Apparently glibc was compiled a few hours after linux-headers. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 01:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My setup is very similar ... no great need for security. My setting is the same as what you posted but then the pam stuff is in there too. What does your whole auth_default {} look like? (Everthing between opening and closing brackets) Here, the whole thing minus the comments is: auth default { mechanisms = plain passdb pam { args = * } userdb passwd { } user = root } I don't know how much of that is needed. I wouldn't care if pam was bypassed too but not sure if it would work then. i have very the same lines -- Linux 2.6.17-ck1 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ 02:17:47 up 17:45, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.23, 0.19 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dovecot... is the bugzilla material?
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:49:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know how much of that is needed. I wouldn't care if pam was bypassed too but not sure if it would work then. I use it without PAM, I don't have PAM installed. Just use passdb passwd { } passdb shadow { } to have it authenticate through /etc/passwd. I'm nit sure if both are needed, I'll have to try with just one. -- Neil Bothwick Did you sleep well? No, I made a couple of mistakes. signature.asc Description: PGP signature