[gentoo-user] Re: Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry. I should have started that a number of the failures have come > while doing revdep-rebuild. One seemingly large problem is that > revdep-rebuild wants to rebuild packages that are no longer in portage > so you have to remove those from the rebuild or attempt to change > revision numbers by hand on the fly in the long command that > revdep-rebuild -p creates. revedep-rebuild -X. That's default in the rewritten version. Alexander Skwar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the revdep-rebuild guys should (could?) include -X if it's the > right thing to do? They do. Alexander Skwar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me that means updating 6 > machines in parallel which is a significant time sync. Are those machines identical? If so, why don't you just update just one machine and then mount /lib, /usr, ... from that machine, or use FEATURES=buildpkg or --buildpkg and then simply install the resulting packages on these other machines? Alexander Skwar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
