Re: [gentoo-user] ruby gems versus emerge

2008-02-08 Thread Thomas Pani
Thufir wrote:
> I installed the "fastercsv" gem via gems rather than emerge :(
> 
> From http://packages.gentoo.org/category/dev-ruby?full_cat I don't even 
> see that package listed.
> 
> Are gems supposed to be installed via emerge?
Yes. There's a gems eclass that handles installing gems, making
gems-ebuils fairly easy. Have a look at, for example, the
dev-ruby/camping ebuild.

Oh, and there's an ebuild request (bug #209319) for dev-ruby/fastercsv,
including an ebuild submission. Just get it and put it in your local
overlay (or set one up, if you haven't already) :).

Cheers,
thomas
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ruby gems versus emerge

2008-02-08 Thread Mike Mazur
Hi Thufir,

On Feb 8, 2008 8:56 AM, Thufir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed the "fastercsv" gem via gems rather than emerge :(
>
> From http://packages.gentoo.org/category/dev-ruby?full_cat I don't even
> see that package listed.
>
> Are gems supposed to be installed via emerge?

I think the gems that make it into portage are ones the devs need.
There's been a few that I've used that aren't in portage.

As to which one you should use, I'm not sure. Personal preference?

Mike
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] ruby gems versus emerge

2008-02-07 Thread Thufir
I installed the "fastercsv" gem via gems rather than emerge :(

>From http://packages.gentoo.org/category/dev-ruby?full_cat I don't even 
see that package listed.

Are gems supposed to be installed via emerge?



thanks,

Thufir

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list