Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 03:40 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is somebody using the package x11-base/x11-drm for intel's integrated > > graphics? > > I'd like to see the output of "dmesg |grep -i drm" to see, of i actually > > have some advanatge of using it. > > > > With the kernel's own 2.6.25, my "dmesg|grep -i drm" says: > > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on > > minor 0 > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output of > "dmesg | grep drm" > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for me > (at least there was a reason for me to put it > in /etc/portage/package.keywords) I also experienced problems getting one to work and settled with this: $ dmesg |grep -i drm [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.26.0 20060524 on minor 0 [drm] Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs HTH. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:15 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > === On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 12:52 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > > === On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === > > > ... > > > > > > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same > > > > output of "dmesg | grep drm" > > > > > > > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked > > > > for me (at least there was a reason for me to put it > > > > in /etc/portage/package.keywords) > > > > > > How to determine "drm works"? 'dmesg | grep drm' out is: > > > > > > [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > > > [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0 > > > > > > 'lsmod | grep drm' out is: > > > > > > drm92648 3 i915 > > > > > > and 'lspci | grep -i vga' out is: > > > > > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 > > > Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > Let's say it that way: 3D-acceleration works and unmasking > > =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 was part of the solution. > > Aha, 3D... I bother about 2D only. Does it mean I can bravely forget all > these drm-related things? I'm not sure if 2D-acceleration depends on it as well. If you don't suffer from problems while scrolling, watching videos and so on, you might not need it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
=== On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 12:52 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > === On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === > > ... > > > > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same > > > output of "dmesg | grep drm" > > > > > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked > > > for me (at least there was a reason for me to put it > > > in /etc/portage/package.keywords) > > > > How to determine "drm works"? 'dmesg | grep drm' out is: > > > > [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > > [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0 > > > > 'lsmod | grep drm' out is: > > > > drm92648 3 i915 > > > > and 'lspci | grep -i vga' out is: > > > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 > > Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) > > > > > > Andrew > > Let's say it that way: 3D-acceleration works and unmasking > =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 was part of the solution. Aha, 3D... I bother about 2D only. Does it mean I can bravely forget all these drm-related things? -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 12:52 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > === On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === > ... > > > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output > > of "dmesg | grep drm" > > > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for > > me (at least there was a reason for me to put it > > in /etc/portage/package.keywords) > > How to determine "drm works"? 'dmesg | grep drm' out is: > > [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0 > > 'lsmod | grep drm' out is: > > drm92648 3 i915 > > and 'lspci | grep -i vga' out is: > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated > Graphics Controller (rev 02) > > > Andrew Let's say it that way: 3D-acceleration works and unmasking =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 was part of the solution. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
=== On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: === ... > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output > of "dmesg | grep drm" > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for > me (at least there was a reason for me to put it > in /etc/portage/package.keywords) How to determine "drm works"? 'dmesg | grep drm' out is: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0 'lsmod | grep drm' out is: drm92648 3 i915 and 'lspci | grep -i vga' out is: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G965 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) Andrew -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 03:40 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: > Hi, > > is somebody using the package x11-base/x11-drm for intel's integrated > graphics? > I'd like to see the output of "dmesg |grep -i drm" to see, of i actually > have some advanatge of using it. > > With the kernel's own 2.6.25, my "dmesg|grep -i drm" says: > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on > minor 0 > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output of "dmesg | grep drm" If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for me (at least there was a reason for me to put it in /etc/portage/package.keywords) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-user] somebody using x11-drm?
Hi, is somebody using the package x11-base/x11-drm for intel's integrated graphics? I'd like to see the output of "dmesg |grep -i drm" to see, of i actually have some advanatge of using it. With the kernel's own 2.6.25, my "dmesg|grep -i drm" says: Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on minor 0 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
