Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-29 Thread Brett I. Holcomb

I forgot about the thirty day wait.  I'll keyword it.

On Sun, 29 May 2005, Neil Bothwick wrote:


On Sat, 28 May 2005 20:08:53 -0400 (EDT), Brett I. Holcomb wrote:


Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to
install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I
was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I
guess I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.


It is masked as testing because it is new. Packages stay in testing, on
average, for around thirty days before being marked stable. this probably
isn't a good idea for a virus checker, an unstable version is unlikely to
take down your system, but an old version is worse than nothing. I'd
recommend adding testing clamav to /etc/portage/package.keywords





--

Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 28 May 2005 20:08:53 -0400 (EDT), Brett I. Holcomb wrote:

> Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to 
> install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I 
> was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I
> guess I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.

It is masked as testing because it is new. Packages stay in testing, on
average, for around thirty days before being marked stable. this probably
isn't a good idea for a virus checker, an unstable version is unlikely to
take down your system, but an old version is worse than nothing. I'd
recommend adding testing clamav to /etc/portage/package.keywords 


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Remember, UNIX spelled backwards is XINU.


pgpCiaHlO1pNM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-29 Thread Brett I. Holcomb

Thanks.  I'll go for it.

On Sun, 29 May 2005, Rumen Yotov wrote:


Robert S wrote:


Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to
install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I
was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I guess
I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.






Hi,
Had this problem too, even more clamav (x86) wasn't working with
qmail-scanner at all.
Went to ~x86 and it works. Maybe 0.85.1 should be made stable, not just
as a warning ;)
HTH. Rumen



--

Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-28 Thread Rumen Yotov
Robert S wrote:

>>Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to
>>install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I
>>was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I guess
>>I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.
>>
>>
>
>I've been using 0.85/0.85.1 and now 0.85.1-r1 with no problems.  I
>always used to use the latest version compiled from source before I
>started using gentoo.  Never had any problems related to the version. 
>The clamav-milter startup script has been improved and the pid and
>socket files have been moved to a much more logical place.  Expect to
>do a small amount of fiddling.
>
>If your life doesn't depend on it, you'd be OK using the latest.  I
>think that you need the latest version to catch all the viri.
>
>  
>
Hi,
Had this problem too, even more clamav (x86) wasn't working with
qmail-scanner at all.
Went to ~x86 and it works. Maybe 0.85.1 should be made stable, not just
as a warning ;)
HTH. Rumen


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-28 Thread Brett I. Holcomb

Thanks for the feedback.  I may give it a try here.
x
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Robert S wrote:


Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to
install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I
was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I guess
I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.


I've been using 0.85/0.85.1 and now 0.85.1-r1 with no problems.  I
always used to use the latest version compiled from source before I
started using gentoo.  Never had any problems related to the version.
The clamav-milter startup script has been improved and the pid and
socket files have been moved to a much more logical place.  Expect to
do a small amount of fiddling.

If your life doesn't depend on it, you'd be OK using the latest.  I
think that you need the latest version to catch all the viri.




--

Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-28 Thread Robert S
> Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to
> install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I
> was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I guess
> I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.

I've been using 0.85/0.85.1 and now 0.85.1-r1 with no problems.  I
always used to use the latest version compiled from source before I
started using gentoo.  Never had any problems related to the version. 
The clamav-milter startup script has been improved and the pid and
socket files have been moved to a much more logical place.  Expect to
do a small amount of fiddling.

If your life doesn't depend on it, you'd be OK using the latest.  I
think that you need the latest version to catch all the viri.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-28 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Yes, I saw that - but it's masked for some reason and I hesitate to 
install it until it's unmasked as I assume it's masked for a reason.  I 
was wondering if there was anything else I could or needed to do.  I guess 
I'll wait until 0.85 is unmasked.



On Sun, 29 May 2005, Peter Ruskin wrote:


On Saturday 28 May 2005 23:53, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:

During startup clamav tells me it's out of date.  If I run
freshclam I get the message below.  However, I'm running the most
current version in portage and haven't found anyting in bugzilla
about this.  What do I do to get the functionality level where
clamav will be happy?

ClamAV update process started at Sat May 28 18:52:09 2005
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update
5


$ grep app-antivirus/clamav /etc/portage/package.keywords
app-antivirus/clamav ~x86




--

Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Clamav out of date

2005-05-28 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
During startup clamav tells me it's out of date.  If I run freshclam I get 
the message below.  However, I'm running the most current version in 
portage and haven't found anyting in bugzilla about this.  What do I do to 
get the functionality level where clamav will be happy?


ClamAV update process started at Sat May 28 18:52:09 2005
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Local version: 0.83 Recommended version: 0.85.1
main.cvd is up to date (version: 31, sigs: 33079, f-level: 4, builder: 
tkojm)
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 898, sigs: 1782, f-level: 5, builder: 
ccordes)

WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately!
WARNING: Current functionality level = 4, required = 5


--

Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list