Re: [gentoo-user] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
Nick Rout wrote: >On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:28:47 +0100 >Mike Williams wrote: > > > >>On Friday 16 September 2005 03:11, Nick Rout wrote: >> >> >>>I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if >>>possible the packages cd (for a quick result) . >>> >>>I have an athlon 1133. >>> >>>The package cd's don't seem to have an athlon version any more. the >>>choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64 x86. >>> >>>Is it true that the packagers have abandoned p3, p4 and athlon-*?? >>> >>> >>http://tracker.netdomination.org/ appears to have them, but I too find it odd >>they aren't listed elsewhere. >> >> > >Yeah i just found them! But I wonder who built them? They are not >mentioned on the gentoo release page. > >Also can a straight old "athlon" use the "athlon-xp" builds? > >Dazed & Confused. > > > >>-- >>Mike Williams >>-- >>gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list >> >> > > > No, don't go there, I have both Athlon and Athlon-xp boxes here. I once mixed up what was where and set up my Athlon as if it were an Athlon-xp. Nothing but outright grief. -- Ted Ozolins(VE7TVO) Westbank, B. C -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:28:47 +0100 Mike Williams wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 03:11, Nick Rout wrote: > > I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if > > possible the packages cd (for a quick result) . > > > > I have an athlon 1133. > > > > The package cd's don't seem to have an athlon version any more. the > > choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64 x86. > > > > Is it true that the packagers have abandoned p3, p4 and athlon-*?? > > http://tracker.netdomination.org/ appears to have them, but I too find it odd > they aren't listed elsewhere. Yeah i just found them! But I wonder who built them? They are not mentioned on the gentoo release page. Also can a straight old "athlon" use the "athlon-xp" builds? Dazed & Confused. > > -- > Mike Williams > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
Is it true that the packagers have abandoned p3, p4 and athlon-*?? I don't know about that, Nick, but if you can't find the p3, p4, or athlon packages I can tell you that distcc will be your best friend ;-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
On Friday 16 September 2005 03:11, Nick Rout wrote: > I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if > possible the packages cd (for a quick result) . > > I have an athlon 1133. > > The package cd's don't seem to have an athlon version any more. the > choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64 x86. > > Is it true that the packagers have abandoned p3, p4 and athlon-*?? http://tracker.netdomination.org/ appears to have them, but I too find it odd they aren't listed elsewhere. -- Mike Williams -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
I am looking at building a box this weekend. I want to use 2005.1 and if possible the packages cd (for a quick result) . I have an athlon 1133. The package cd's don't seem to have an athlon version any more. the choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64 x86. Is it true that the packagers have abandoned p3, p4 and athlon-*?? -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
