Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-15 Thread forgottenwizard
On 01:16 Tue 15 Apr , Philip Webb wrote:
 080414 forgottenwizard wrote:
  On 03:58 Mon 14 Apr , Philip Webb wrote:
  Vim defaults to keeping temporary files in  /var/tmp ,
  but Mutt defaults to  /tmp   Vim called by Mutt does the same.
  Recently, I changed the default in  .muttrc  to use  /var/tmp  instead
   as a result I can happily have  /tmp  cleared at every reboot,
  which reminds me, I need to delete many  /var/tmp/mutt-*  ... (smile).
  Off-topic, I know, but can you post how to do this?
 
 It doesn't seem OT to me (smile): in  ~/.muttrc  include the line
 
   set tmpdir=/var/tmp
 
 Vim otherwise continues to keep its  .swp  files
 in the same dir as the file it's editing; only Mutt is affected,
 but you are guaranteed recovery of an e-mail being edited during a crash.
 
 To set the system to clear  /tmp  at boot,
 edit  /etc/conf.d/bootmisc  to include the line
 
   WIPE_TMP=yes
 
 -- 
 ,,
 SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
 TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto
 -- 
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
 

Thanks. WIPE_TMP seems to be the default, fwiw.

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:36:42 -0400, Steven Lembark wrote:

  I second that, tmpfs for /tmp is great:

 Catch: You loose it all on reboot.

You are supposed to. The LFS says that /tmp is for files that do not need
to survive a reboot. Baselayout now defaults to wiping /tmp at boot
anyway.

 Since things like vi keep their in-work backups
 there, loosing the entire contents of /tmp after a
 crash can be painful.

Then they are broken, such data should be stored in /var/tmp.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Can you be a closet claustrophobic?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-14 Thread Philip Webb
080414 Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:36:42 -0400, Steven Lembark wrote:
 vi keep their in-work backups there,
 loosing the entire contents of /tmp after a crash can be painful.
 Then they are broken, such data should be stored in /var/tmp.

Vim defaults to keeping temporary files in  /var/tmp ,
but Mutt defaults to  /tmp   Vim called by Mutt does the same.
Recently, I changed the default in  .muttrc  to use  /var/tmp  instead
 as a result I can happily have  /tmp  cleared at every reboot,
which reminds me, I need to delete many  /var/tmp/mutt-*  ... (smile).

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-14 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 14 April 2008, Steven Lembark wrote:
  I second that, tmpfs for /tmp is great:
 
  tmpfs                 512M   12K  512M   1% /tmp

 Catch: You loose it all on reboot.

Doesn't matter. The standard definition for /tmp (per FHS) is contains 
files that are not expected to persists across different invocations of 
a program. Never mind reboots, if you just exit and restart vi, it 
cannot expect the temp file to still be there.

vi is a sane program and will in all likelihood respect this 
almost-universal standard. If anyone wants different behaviour (can't 
think why...) then configure vi to use a different directory as a 
scratch pad

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-14 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag, 14. April 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:

 vi is a sane program and will in all likelihood respect this
 almost-universal standard. If anyone wants different behaviour (can't
 think why...) then configure vi to use a different directory as a
 scratch pad

it is not sane, but it would be surprising if it really does depend on /tmp 
surviving a reboot.
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-14 Thread Philip Webb
080414 forgottenwizard wrote:
 On 03:58 Mon 14 Apr , Philip Webb wrote:
 Vim defaults to keeping temporary files in  /var/tmp ,
 but Mutt defaults to  /tmp   Vim called by Mutt does the same.
 Recently, I changed the default in  .muttrc  to use  /var/tmp  instead
  as a result I can happily have  /tmp  cleared at every reboot,
 which reminds me, I need to delete many  /var/tmp/mutt-*  ... (smile).
 Off-topic, I know, but can you post how to do this?

It doesn't seem OT to me (smile): in  ~/.muttrc  include the line

  set tmpdir=/var/tmp

Vim otherwise continues to keep its  .swp  files
in the same dir as the file it's editing; only Mutt is affected,
but you are guaranteed recovery of an e-mail being edited during a crash.

To set the system to clear  /tmp  at boot,
edit  /etc/conf.d/bootmisc  to include the line

  WIPE_TMP=yes

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Florian Philipp
Hi list!

Due to disk space restrictions I've decided to make /tmp a symlink
to /var/tmp instead of reserving space for both. Maybe it would have
been wiser to make /tmp a symlink to a dedicated directory in /var/tmp
but now it's too late.

Anyway, now I've found /var/tmp crowded with thousands of files with six
letters long nonsensical names like 6mtgWC or bOaiA0 each 4.9 kB
big. file identifies them as TrueType font data. They all belong to
my user.

Now I'm wondering where they come from, (maybe OOo, Epdfview or
Acroread?), and if I can I safely remove them.

By the way, does anyone know whether tracker writes to /tmp or /var/tmp?

Thanks in advance!

Florian Philipp


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Steven Lembark

 Due to disk space restrictions I've decided to make /tmp a symlink
 to /var/tmp instead of reserving space for both. Maybe it would have
 been wiser to make /tmp a symlink to a dedicated directory in /var/tmp
 but now it's too late.

I'd suggest not symlinking /tmp since it is part of the
system startup. If you want to reserve a single space
just mount it under both /tmp and /var/tmp. That avoids
issues with not having any tmp space at all (or symlink
/var/tmp - /tmp if you want to use a symlink).


-- 
Steven Lembark85-09 90th St.
Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY, 11421
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  +1 888 359 3508
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:38:31 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:

 Due to disk space restrictions I've decided to make /tmp a symlink
 to /var/tmp instead of reserving space for both.

Why not use tmpfs for /tmp? It usually requires very little space, and
will use swap if memory is tight.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

The careful application of terror is also a form of communication.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sonntag, 13. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:38:31 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
  Due to disk space restrictions I've decided to make /tmp a symlink
  to /var/tmp instead of reserving space for both.

 Why not use tmpfs for /tmp? It usually requires very little space, and
 will use swap if memory is tight.

I second that, tmpfs for /tmp is great:

tmpfs 512M   12K  512M   1% /tmp
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 13 April 2008 21:28:22 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 On Sonntag, 13. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
  Why not use tmpfs for /tmp? It usually requires very little space, and
  will use swap if memory is tight.

 I second that, tmpfs for /tmp is great:

 tmpfs 512M   12K  512M   1% /tmp

I can do better than that, on this system with 4GB RAM:

tmpfs   /tmptmpfs   nodev,nosuid,size=6g0 0

No that we're in a competition, you understand.

-- 
Rgds
Peter
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Garbage in /tmp or /var/tmp

2008-04-13 Thread Steven Lembark
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 On Sonntag, 13. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:38:31 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
 Due to disk space restrictions I've decided to make /tmp a symlink
 to /var/tmp instead of reserving space for both.
 Why not use tmpfs for /tmp? It usually requires very little space, and
 will use swap if memory is tight.

 I second that, tmpfs for /tmp is great:

 tmpfs 512M   12K  512M   1% /tmp

Catch: You loose it all on reboot.

Since things like vi keep their in-work backups
there, loosing the entire contents of /tmp after a
crash can be painful.

If you can redirect anything making in-work copies
to, say, /scratch or ~ then this works nicely (given
that you have enough core not to strangle on it).


-- 
Steven Lembark85-09 90th St.
Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY, 11421
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  +1 888 359 3508
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list