Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-08-15 Thread Kevin O'Gorman

On 8/13/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Monday 14 August 2006 04:39, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:


 This was not the first time.  It wasn't the last either -- I'm looking at a
 new fresh crop.  Am I then to understand that none of these messages will
 ever be warning ME that I need to do something (actually, I know that's not
 true).

 If not, how am I to tell?  What clues are you guys going on?  Is it just
 beyond some threshold of geekishness/incomprehensibility that marks it as
 for devs only?


the threashold is, that this is a warning about a function used in ebuilds to
use a certain eclass, which is even more ebuild stuff. And correcting ebuilds
is dev stuff.

No need for geekiness threshold - if it is about ebuilds and eclasses, it is
for devs. Heck, every problem/warning about an ebuild is for devs.


If there is a message for the user, it is usually very easy to recognize.
Stuff like: 'after updating package FOO to version X.Y.Z-r3 you need to
rebuilt package BAR' is obviously for you, the user.


I'm not reassured.  I don't think messages among devs should share a
channel with messages to users without some explicit tagging.  The stuff
you say is for devs looks worrisome to me because I don't really understand
it.  I'd like something more clear.
++ kevin


--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-08-15 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 07:54, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On 8/13/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  On Monday 14 August 2006 04:39, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
   This was not the first time.  It wasn't the last either -- I'm looking
   at a new fresh crop.  Am I then to understand that none of these
   messages will ever be warning ME that I need to do something (actually,
   I know that's not true).
  
   If not, how am I to tell?  What clues are you guys going on?  Is it
   just beyond some threshold of geekishness/incomprehensibility that
   marks it as for devs only?
 
  the threashold is, that this is a warning about a function used in
  ebuilds to use a certain eclass, which is even more ebuild stuff. And
  correcting ebuilds is dev stuff.
 
  No need for geekiness threshold - if it is about ebuilds and eclasses, it
  is for devs. Heck, every problem/warning about an ebuild is for devs.
 
 
  If there is a message for the user, it is usually very easy to recognize.
  Stuff like: 'after updating package FOO to version X.Y.Z-r3 you need to
  rebuilt package BAR' is obviously for you, the user.

 I'm not reassured.  I don't think messages among devs should share a
 channel with messages to users without some explicit tagging.  The stuff
 you say is for devs looks worrisome to me because I don't really understand
 it.  I'd like something more clear.

if there is really a problem the ebuild aborts.

Is that clear enough?

Most of the 'for dev' messages, have a QA in front of it. This ones can be 
ignored by you safely. Everything that might be interessting for you is in 
the ebuild, in the 'einfo' block.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-08-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 13:27, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
 Everything that might be interessting for you is in
 the ebuild, in the 'einfo' block.

Or 'ewarn' or 'eerror' or 'elog'. And in the case of an eerror the emerge will 
die too. All of those four have an asterisk '*' in front of it when displayed 
on the console.

I think the purpose of having it shown to users too is to make sure that a bug 
report will be filed which is an option for users who knows what it means 
least...

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpKRh9MLxMF4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-08-13 Thread Kevin O'Gorman

On 7/22/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 WARN: prerm
 Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use
 toolchain-funcs.eclass


Needs to be fixed by the maintainer of the ebuild.  If you feel like it,
file a bug (check first to see that there isn't already one), or if you
really feel like being obnoxious, e-mail the maintainer (check in the
ebuild).
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


This was not the first time.  It wasn't the last either -- I'm looking at a new
fresh crop.  Am I then to understand that none of these messages will ever
be warning ME that I need to do something (actually, I know that's not true).

If not, how am I to tell?  What clues are you guys going on?  Is it just beyond
some threshold of geekishness/incomprehensibility that marks it as for
devs only?

IMNSHO, there's gotta be a better way to run this.

++ kevin

--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-07-22 Thread Kevin O'Gorman

The ebuild for media-libs/libmpeg3-1.5.2 is giving me a message I don't
know how to use:


WARN: prerm
Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass

WARN: postrm
Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass


I don't know how to upgrade this any more than what I just did by emerging it.
Anybody know what it's talking about?  Anybody even know what toolchain-funcs
it's talking about -- my browse through the portage tree comes up with
no obvious
candidate.

++ kevin

--
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-07-22 Thread Iain Buchanan
Hi,

On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 18:43 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 The ebuild for media-libs/libmpeg3-1.5.2 is giving me a message I don't
 know how to use:
 
  WARN: prerm
  Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass
 
  WARN: postrm
  Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass
 
 I don't know how to upgrade this any more than what I just did by emerging it.
 Anybody know what it's talking about?  Anybody even know what toolchain-funcs
 it's talking about -- my browse through the portage tree comes up with
 no obvious
 candidate.

I think (and I'm kindof guessing) is this is a message from dev's to
dev's, essentially saying the ebuild (libmpeg) needs to be altered
slightly to use some new features of portage instead of some old.
Something to do with the nature of the continuing development on
portage.

I think you don't need to worry about it at all, so long as your package
installs in the end.

HTH,
-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

You can only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] PORTAGE message

2006-07-22 Thread Ryan Tandy

Kevin O'Gorman wrote:

WARN: prerm
Please upgrade your package (libmpeg3-1.5.2) to use 
toolchain-funcs.eclass




Needs to be fixed by the maintainer of the ebuild.  If you feel like it, 
file a bug (check first to see that there isn't already one), or if you 
really feel like being obnoxious, e-mail the maintainer (check in the 
ebuild).

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list