Corbin <corbinbird <at> charter.net> writes:
> > In the Kernel section of the amd64-handbook:: > > > > "root #nano -w /etc/fstab > > FILE /etc/fstabConfiguring the /boot mountpoint > > /dev/sda2 /boot ext2 defaults 0 2 " > > > > <then this note> Ah, thx, I did find this which matches up with the default guidanced in the setting up the disk secition:: /etc/fstabA full /etc/fstab example /dev/sda2 /boot ext2 defaults,noatime 0 2 /dev/sda3 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/sda4 / ext4 noatime 0 1 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,user 0 0 But, I guess I was not clear in proposing this as a bug. There should be a clickable link to jump ahead to that section (just above that you mentioned). But even more problematic the minimal_CD leaves the fresh install with what I listed below:: > > Now finishing up the manual installation I have this default /etc/fstab:: > > > > /dev/BOOT /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 2 > > /dev/ROOT / ext3 noatime 0 1 > > /dev/SWAP none swap sw 0 0 > > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro 0 0 > > /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto 0 0 > > > > which seems vintage. So a bug probable needs to be file on the > > handbook, but a bit of discussion might be wise, first. I guess I was just expecting the minimal CD to match the handbook. So is that a bug? Is the missing link between the boot portion of the fstab and the full fstab example a bug too? An enhancement (yes, I did not see the full fstab in the subsequent section so thanks for point that out. Comments on if either if these are a bug? James
