[gentoo-user] Re: Moving from old udev to eudev

2013-08-02 Thread Steven J. Long
Samuli Suominen wrote:
 Futhermore predictable network interface names work as designed,

Unfortunately the design is crap.

-- 
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)



[gentoo-user] Re: Moving from old udev to eudev

2013-08-02 Thread Steven J. Long
Samuli Suominen wrote:
 FUD again. The backwards compability is still all there and udev can be 
 built standalone and ran standalone.

Sorry I'm going to call bullshit on this one.

You know damn well upstream moved udev into systemd, promising everyone it 
would
be possible to continue to build just udev, and then changed that with weasel 
words
into build everything and extract udev.

So you cannot build udev standalone any more, as you state. You have to build 
systemd
and then extract the udev stuff you actually want.

You don't like other projects bundling dependencies, but somehow it's ok for 
systemd.
Utter tripe.

 And on the contrary, there was no need for sys-fs/eudev to remove 
 support for sys-fs/systemd when it could have supported both 
 sys-apps/systemd and sys-apps/openrc like sys-fs/udev does without issues.

Huh? WTF would be the point, when systemd bundles udev?

We already have loads of people on the forums having issues with conflicts 
between
sys-apps/systemd and sys-fs/udev, so again your point is total nonsense.

None of which detracts from for your sterling work on Gentoo, and the support 
you provide
to users on various media.

-- 
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)