Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:36:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I assume you aren't specifying --jobs=[2,3,4,...]. Very useful > embellishment of emerge: gets things done in half the time. --jobs=2 doubles the number of ebuilds being merged, not the number of cores in your processor :-O It is faster, but not by that much, unless you use MAKEOPTS=-j1 -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 22: Childproof signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sunday 18 April 2010 17:29:12 YoYo siska wrote: > You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it > starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge > --resume --skipfirst > > that's what I usually do with openoffice and similar apps when I do a > "quick" update and fail to notice the large app in there.. ;) I assume you aren't specifying --jobs=[2,3,4,...]. Very useful embellishment of emerge: gets things done in half the time. -- Rgds Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 1:58 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:00:40 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: >> >> emerge -pev world >> >> >> >> Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB >> Portage tree and overlays: >> [0] /usr/portage >> [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined >> >> !!! The following installed packages are masked: >> - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) >> - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) >> - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) >> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge >> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. > You could put it in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided too, so the > system knows it is there. But what's the big deal anyway, you could have > re-emerge gcc tens of times over in the time this thread has been running. > > It's not as though you can't use your computer for other things while gcc > is compiling. I know, its more an exercise for my own knowledge. I learned a few things today that will save me time in the future, and every little bit helps... Thanks a lot for the feedback... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 3:57 PM, YoYo siska wrote: >> Will etc-update still prompt for all necessary changes for config >> files for *all* of the installs done, considering I did ctrl-c 3 >> times (glibc, and both gcc's)? > yes, if new config files got installed, etc-update will show them (I > think it uses 'find' to find them ;) Yep, I posed the question before the last package was done, but then it finished, and etc-update went smooth... Thanks again... and I just read that gcc 4.5 just went gold, so I guess it won't be all that long before 4.4 is stabilized and I'll have to do some of this again - but at least I know I may not always have to emerge -e system/world every time... :) -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:54:38PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 3:49 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2010-04-18 1:09 PM, YoYo siska wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >>> On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: > >> well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc > >> compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking > >> anything. > > > > Dang - I already started the emerge... > > > You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it > starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge > --resume --skipfirst > > > > Worked a treat, many thanks! Saved me at least an hour of compile time... :) > > Hmmm... one last question... > > Will etc-update still prompt for all necessary changes for config files > for *all* of the installs done, considering I did ctrl-c 3 times (glibc, > and both gcc's)? yes, if new config files got installed, etc-update will show them (I think it uses 'find' to find them ;) yoyo
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 3:49 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 1:09 PM, YoYo siska wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: >> well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc >> compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking >> anything. > > Dang - I already started the emerge... > You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge --resume --skipfirst > > Worked a treat, many thanks! Saved me at least an hour of compile time... :) Hmmm... one last question... Will etc-update still prompt for all necessary changes for config files for *all* of the installs done, considering I did ctrl-c 3 times (glibc, and both gcc's)? -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 1:09 PM, YoYo siska wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: > well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc > compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking > anything. Dang - I already started the emerge... >>> You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it >>> starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge >>> --resume --skipfirst Worked a treat, many thanks! Saved me at least an hour of compile time... :) -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:00:40 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: > > emerge -pev world > > > > Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB > Portage tree and overlays: > [0] /usr/portage > [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined > > !!! The following installed packages are masked: > - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) > - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) > - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) > For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge > man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. You could put it in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided too, so the system knows it is there. But what's the big deal anyway, you could have re-emerge gcc tens of times over in the time this thread has been running. It's not as though you can't use your computer for other things while gcc is compiling. -- Neil Bothwick I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 1:11 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote: > On 04/18/10 11:00, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Crap, doesn't look like this will work... >> >> After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: >> >> emerge -pev world >> >> >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libc" have been masked. >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your >> request: >> - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) >> - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) >> >> For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge >> man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. >> >> myhost : Sun Apr 18, 10:56:51 : ~ >> # >> >> Any other ideas? > This is normal, it's informing you that those packages are masked, but > not actually blocking the other updates. If you do: > > #emerge -e world -av > > i.e ask instead of pretend, it will output those warnings, and then ask > you if you want to proceed with updating the rest. Well of all the... ! :) Thanks Vincent... I guess that makes sense. The way those errors were formatted though, it resembled the [B] blocking errors I've encountered in the past, so I thought it meant they needed to be fixed first... Anyway, I learned a few things (--resume --skipfirst, how to output a list of packages to a file then emerge them, etc), so it wasn't wasted bandwidth, for me at least... ;) Thanks guys... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 04/18/10 11:00, Tanstaafl wrote: > Crap, doesn't look like this will work... > > After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: > > emerge -pev world > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libc" have been masked. > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > request: > - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) > - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) > For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge > man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. > > myhost : Sun Apr 18, 10:56:51 : ~ > # > > Any other ideas? This is normal, it's informing you that those packages are masked, but not actually blocking the other updates. If you do: #emerge -e world -av i.e ask instead of pretend, it will output those warnings, and then ask you if you want to proceed with updating the rest. I'm using the unstable portage, but I'm pretty sure it's worked like this for quite a while on the stable branch too. Good luck :).
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52:26PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: > >>> well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc > >>> compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking > >>> anything. > > >> Dang - I already started the emerge... > > > You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it > > starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge > > --resume --skipfirst > > To clarify - I can do this with the currently running emerge (that did > not specify --keep-going)? > > So, when it gets to gcc (its on package # 181 of 355 now, hasn't hit > either of the gcc's or glibc yet), hit ctrl-c, then: > > emerge --resume --skipfirst > > ? Do I need to add the -ev world in there? Or does emerge just know > where to pick up all by itself? > yes, it knows what the last emerge was, so you just say --resume but if you do another emerge in between, it will forget the previous interrupted one --resume just "resumes" the last interrupted (or failed) emerge , starting with the package that was interrupted, so that you can fix the problem if it was a compilation failure, and then continue... no need to give any special args to the first emerge. --skipfirst makes it skip the first package - the one that was interrupted handy when the emerge fails on a packages that isn't a depency of something other, you can just skip it then, very much like a "manual" --keep-going ;) > This is good info to have. > > Also - is it ok to do this during the actual compile? Or do I need to > catch it before the actual compiling starts? you can break it whenever you want.. --resume than starts the package again from beginning so you just "waste" the time/work it allready did... which does not really matter if you are going to do --skipfirst ;) yoyo
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 04:59:07PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > Is there a way to emerge, say, system, but omit one package in it? > > For example, I've already recompiled gcc 4.3.4 with itself... is there a > way to now do something like: > > emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile > everything *but* gcc)? > > Its not a big deal, I'm just curious... > > -- > > Charles > You can do something like: emerge -pe world | sed -e "/^.ebuild/ ! d; s/.*] /=/; s/ .*//; " > list ... edit "list" and remove anything you don't want to reinstall ... emerge -av1 `cat list` the -1 (or --oneshot), means that the packages won't be added to the world file (they would normally because you are listing them all on the commandline) yoyo
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 12:29 PM, YoYo siska wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: >>> well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc >>> compiles. not very nice, but will work without breaking >>> anything. >> Dang - I already started the emerge... > You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it > starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge > --resume --skipfirst To clarify - I can do this with the currently running emerge (that did not specify --keep-going)? So, when it gets to gcc (its on package # 181 of 355 now, hasn't hit either of the gcc's or glibc yet), hit ctrl-c, then: emerge --resume --skipfirst ? Do I need to add the -ev world in there? Or does emerge just know where to pick up all by itself? This is good info to have. Also - is it ok to do this during the actual compile? Or do I need to catch it before the actual compiling starts? > that's what I usually do with openoffice and similar apps when I do a > "quick" update and fail to notice the large app in there.. ;) Many thanks YoYo - this could save me a lot of time this afternoon! :) -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:57:48AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: > > well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles. > > not very nice, but will work without breaking anything. > > Dang - I already started the emerge... You can still break the emerge (for example with ctrl-c) when it starts to emerge gcc, the continue the emerge process with emerge --resume --skipfirst that's what I usually do with openoffice and similar apps when I do a "quick" update and fail to notice the large app in there.. ;) yoyo
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 11:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: >> well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles. >> not very nice, but will work without breaking anything. Hmmm... clarification though... when you say 'kill something'... how would I kill just that one gcc emerge? Ctrl-c would kill the entire emerge session... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 11:54 AM, Arttu V. wrote: > On 4/18/10, Tanstaafl wrote: You could try temporarily masking it: #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask Then updating: #emerge -e system Then removing the mask: #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. >>> >>> Hmmm, good idea, thanks Vincent... >> >> Crap, doesn't look like this will work... > >> >> Any other ideas? > A guess: try it with package.provided instead of package.mask. See the > section on portage man page. The syntax for package.provided requires > a full version atom (e.g., sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r1), but this approach > might not interfere with dep tree calculations like masking does. Noted for future reference as well Arttu, thanks... if it works I won't have to sit there and watch for the gcc compiles... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-18 11:45 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote: > well... you could use --keep-going and kill something when gcc compiles. > not very nice, but will work without breaking anything. Dang - I already started the emerge... I'm surprised there's no easy way to do this... I guess just because you don't do this very often, and most people just live with the triple compiles of 2 versions of gcc? Anyway, --keep-going option has been noted for future reference... Thanks Johannes... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 4/18/10, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> You could try temporarily masking it: >>> #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask >>> >>> Then updating: >>> #emerge -e system >>> >>> Then removing the mask: >>> #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask >>> >>> I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. >> >> Hmmm, good idea, thanks Vincent... > > Crap, doesn't look like this will work... > > Any other ideas? A guess: try it with package.provided instead of package.mask. See the section on portage man page. The syntax for package.provided requires a full version atom (e.g., sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r1), but this approach might not interfere with dep tree calculations like masking does. -- Arttu V.
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-04-17 6:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote: On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile everything *but* gcc)? Of course I meant: emerge -e system -gcc You could try temporarily masking it: #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask Then updating: #emerge -e system Then removing the mask: #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. Hmmm, good idea, thanks Vincent... Crap, doesn't look like this will work... After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: emerge -pev world Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB Portage tree and overlays: [0] /usr/portage [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined !!! The following installed packages are masked: - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-devel/gcc:4.1" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-devel/gcc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.3-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r4 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.0.4 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r4 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.2.2 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.1.1-r2 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r10 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r9 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-libs/glibc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.7-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5.1 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 (masked by: profile, package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.7-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5.1 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 (masked by: profile, package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. myhost : Sun Apr 18, 10:56:51 : ~ # Any other ideas? well... you could use --keep-going and kill something
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-17 6:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote: >> On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile everything *but* gcc)? > >>> Of course I meant: >>> >>> emerge -e system -gcc > >> You could try temporarily masking it: >> #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask >> >> Then updating: >> #emerge -e system >> >> Then removing the mask: >> #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask >> >> I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. > > Hmmm, good idea, thanks Vincent... Crap, doesn't look like this will work... After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get: emerge -pev world Total: 351 packages (351 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 5 kB Portage tree and overlays: [0] /usr/portage [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined !!! The following installed packages are masked: - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-devel/gcc:4.1" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-devel/gcc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.3-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r4 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2-r3 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-4.0.4 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r4 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.2.2 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-3.1.1-r2 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r10 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r9 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-libs/glibc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.7-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5.1 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 (masked by: profile, package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libc" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-libs/glibc-2.11-r1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.11 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.7-r2 (masked by: package.mask, ~amd64 keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5.1 (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) - sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r4 (masked by: package.mask) - sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 (masked by: profile, package.mask, missing keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. myhost : Sun Apr 18, 10:56:51 : ~ # Any other ideas? -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-17 6:06 PM, Vincent Launchbury wrote: > On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile >>> everything *but* gcc)? >> Of course I meant: >> >> emerge -e system -gcc > You could try temporarily masking it: > #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask > > Then updating: > #emerge -e system > > Then removing the mask: > #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask > > I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. Hmmm, good idea, thanks Vincent... I just don't see any reason to recompile gcc so many times (system and then again when I do world), when its already been recompiled with itself... -- Charles
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 04/17/10 17:09, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile >> everything *but* gcc)? > > Of course I meant: > > emerge -e system -gcc You could try temporarily masking it: #echo sys-devel/gcc >> /etc/portage/package.mask Then updating: #emerge -e system Then removing the mask: #sed -i '$d' /etc/portage/package.mask I don't know of any emerge flag that does this in one step. Kind Regards, Vincent.
Re: [gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
On 2010-04-17 4:59 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile > everything *but* gcc)? Of course I meant: emerge -e system -gcc
[gentoo-user] Recompile system but omit package?
Is there a way to emerge, say, system, but omit one package in it? For example, I've already recompiled gcc 4.3.4 with itself... is there a way to now do something like: emerge system -gcc (where '-gcc' serves to tell portage to compile everything *but* gcc)? Its not a big deal, I'm just curious... -- Charles
