Re: [gentoo-user] Sun java from source?

2007-12-22 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Saturday 22 December 2007, Yahya Mohammad wrote:

> Apparently there are some bits in sun-jdk licensed from 3rd parties
> that are proprietary. Openjdk project is to replace the proprietary
> pieces to get a fully buildable open source java. However, there's
> already a project called IcedTea that combines the open parts of Java
> with GNU classpath to get a useable jdk. I found a package of it for
> one of my boxes running ubuntu, and it works fine. Maybe we should
> have an ebuild for it too..

Ah thanks, I wasn't aware of idectea. Yes, it seems that having it in 
gentoo would be a good idea. Thanks!

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Sun java from source?

2007-12-21 Thread Yahya Mohammad
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> When will we (or better, portage) be able to compile java from sources? 
> What's the status of the transition? How does openjdk relate to sun-jdk?

Apparently there are some bits in sun-jdk licensed from 3rd parties that
are proprietary. Openjdk project is to replace the proprietary pieces to
get a fully buildable open source java. However, there's already a
project called IcedTea that combines the open parts of Java with GNU
classpath to get a useable jdk. I found a package of it for one of my
boxes running ubuntu, and it works fine. Maybe we should have an ebuild
for it too..
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Sun java from source?

2007-12-21 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
Just curious...I just emerged sun-jdk-1.6.0.03 and I saw that it's still 
installed directly in binary form, despite the recent news of java going 
open source.
When will we (or better, portage) be able to compile java from sources? 
What's the status of the transition? How does openjdk relate to sun-jdk?

Thanks and sorry for the dumb questions.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list