[gentoo-user] emerge busybox Why?
My usual emerge -uavDt world this morning wanted to emerge busybox. It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged it for anything. Any idea why?? Bill Roberts pgp1U8FSsV8oZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge busybox Why?
On Saturday 04 June 2005 23:02, Bill Roberts wrote: My usual emerge -uavDt world this morning wanted to emerge busybox. It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged it for anything. Any idea why?? I believe it's been added to system in place of sash. It's similarly very small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful in emergencies. Regards, Jason Stubbs pgpH9BhbpSTCr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge busybox Why?
Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2005 23:02, Bill Roberts wrote: My usual emerge -uavDt world this morning wanted to emerge busybox. It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged it for anything. Any idea why?? I believe it's been added to system in place of sash. It's similarly very small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful in emergencies. Regards, Jason Stubbs Hi, The answer *is* above, also emerged busybox and later as it didn't depend on anything checked the system with emerge depclean -pv. The result: unmerged sash. evidently busybox takes the place of sash (in system-profile). HTH. Rumen smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge busybox Why?
With apologies for my ignorance, what did sash used to do? My understanding is that busybox is a very small embedded linux for SBCs and controllers and such (I noticed busybox yesterday too, and it made me curious as I didn't remember emerging it). On 6/4/05, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2005 23:02, Bill Roberts wrote: My usual emerge -uavDt world this morning wanted to emerge busybox. It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged it for anything. Any idea why?? I believe it's been added to system in place of sash. It's similarly very small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful in emergencies. Regards, Jason Stubbs Hi, The answer *is* above, also emerged busybox and later as it didn't depend on anything checked the system with emerge depclean -pv. The result: unmerged sash. evidently busybox takes the place of sash (in system-profile). HTH. Rumen -- Sean Crandall Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number 'e'. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge busybox Why?
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 23:12 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2005 23:02, Bill Roberts wrote: My usual emerge -uavDt world this morning wanted to emerge busybox. It doesn't show as a dependency for anything, and I've never emerged it for anything. Any idea why?? I believe it's been added to system in place of sash. It's similarly very small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful in emergencies. Regards, Jason Stubbs Of course if you're particularly adept at breaking your system, busybox may not work unless it is statically linked. # echo sys-apps/busybox static /etc/portage/package.use Before you emerge it. -- Tom Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part