Re: [gentoo-user] kioslaves - an end of an era?
On Monday 17 Apr 2017 22:20:34 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 17/04/2017 22:15, Mick wrote: > > I updated a number of KDE packages today. Konqueror was updated to > > 16.12.3:5 and --depclean revealed this: > > > > kde-apps/kdebase-kioslaves > > > > selected: 16.04.3-r2 > > > >protected: none > > > > omitted: none > > > > Before the update I had to remove manually kde-misc/kio-ftps because it > > was > > holding on to the old konqueror:4. Does this mean KDE kioslaves are of no > > use anymore? > > I believe the new kioslave-like functionality has been replaced with > kde-frameworks/kio > kde-apps/kio-extras Thanks Alan, I can see these have already been installed, so I should OK. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] kioslaves - an end of an era?
On 17/04/2017 22:15, Mick wrote: > I updated a number of KDE packages today. Konqueror was updated to 16.12.3:5 > and --depclean revealed this: > > kde-apps/kdebase-kioslaves > selected: 16.04.3-r2 >protected: none > omitted: none > > Before the update I had to remove manually kde-misc/kio-ftps because it was > holding on to the old konqueror:4. Does this mean KDE kioslaves are of no > use > anymore? > I believe the new kioslave-like functionality has been replaced with kde-frameworks/kio kde-apps/kio-extras -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] kioslaves - an end of an era?
I updated a number of KDE packages today. Konqueror was updated to 16.12.3:5 and --depclean revealed this: kde-apps/kdebase-kioslaves selected: 16.04.3-r2 protected: none omitted: none Before the update I had to remove manually kde-misc/kio-ftps because it was holding on to the old konqueror:4. Does this mean KDE kioslaves are of no use anymore? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.