Re: [gentoo-user] paludis vs emerge

2008-01-30 Thread Ralf Stephan
  Have I overlooked an option comparable to --ask ?
  
 No, Paludis is non-interactive.

With 700 packages, paludis takes quite long here to give output,
and having that double is irritating. Would it be possible to
cache computations such that the second time (without -p) at least
would be faster?


Regards,
ralf
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] paludis vs emerge

2008-01-26 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2008 schrieb Brian Marshall:

  Have I overlooked an option comparable to --ask ?

 No, Paludis is non-interactive.

Nonsense (sorry). --ask functionality is added with a hook script. paludis -ip 
paludis-hooks. You'll get them from the paludis-extras overlay.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] paludis vs emerge

2008-01-25 Thread Brian Marshall
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:30:55 -0500
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've been experimenting with paludis for the last month or two to
 compare it with emerge.  For my periodic update world runs the two
 programs seem functionally comparable.  Paludis is, however, more
 verbose and I'm not liking that aspect.
 
 My typical emerge command is emerge -auDtqv world and produces:
 
   [ebuild   UD] kde-base/kde-3.5.7 [3.5.8] USE=... 
   [ebuild   U ] sys-apps/paludis-0.26.0_alpha9 [0.26.0_alpha7]
 USE=... [noomerge   ] kde-base/kde-3.5.7 [3.5.8] USE=... 
   [nomerge] sys-apps/paludis-0.26.0_alpha9 [0.26.0_alpha7] ...
   [ebuild   U ]  dev-libs/boost-1.34.1-r2 [1.34.1-r1] ...
   [ebuild   UD] app-misc/mime-types-5 [7] ..
 
   Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] no
 
   Quitting.
 
 I like the one brevity as I can see a lot of information and then
 decide whether to go ahead or not.
 
 paludis --show-use-descriptions none -p -i world lets me see
 what's going to happen.  On the down side, I need to run it a
 second time (without the -p) to install the packages.  Also,
 paludis first prints a bunch of informational messages and then
 prints 4 info lines per package.
 
 Have I overlooked an option comparable to --ask ?
 
No, Paludis is non-interactive.

 Have I overlooked an option to suppress the initial messages.
 
Use --compact to compress the package output and --log-level to control
the amount of informational messages.

 Thanks.
 
 David



Brian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] paludis vs emerge

2008-01-25 Thread David Relson
I've been experimenting with paludis for the last month or two to
compare it with emerge.  For my periodic update world runs the two
programs seem functionally comparable.  Paludis is, however, more
verbose and I'm not liking that aspect.

My typical emerge command is emerge -auDtqv world and produces:

  [ebuild   UD] kde-base/kde-3.5.7 [3.5.8] USE=... 
  [ebuild   U ] sys-apps/paludis-0.26.0_alpha9 [0.26.0_alpha7] USE=...
  [noomerge   ] kde-base/kde-3.5.7 [3.5.8] USE=... 
  [nomerge] sys-apps/paludis-0.26.0_alpha9 [0.26.0_alpha7] ...
  [ebuild   U ]  dev-libs/boost-1.34.1-r2 [1.34.1-r1] ...
  [ebuild   UD] app-misc/mime-types-5 [7] ..

  Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] no

  Quitting.

I like the one brevity as I can see a lot of information and then
decide whether to go ahead or not.

paludis --show-use-descriptions none -p -i world lets me see
what's going to happen.  On the down side, I need to run it a
second time (without the -p) to install the packages.  Also,
paludis first prints a bunch of informational messages and then prints 4
info lines per package.

Have I overlooked an option comparable to --ask ?

Have I overlooked an option to suppress the initial messages.

Thanks.

David
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list