[gentoo-user] ping!
Hi, Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end. Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each other. Now to clear up a few loose ends: Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0 start automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be started manually? Is this a bug or a feature? I note the abundance of choices in portage/net-ftp. What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp all I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main" machine, connected to the web via diallup. The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for micro develpt. emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12 Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52 kB but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither make.conf mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know something I don't? -Maxim __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler wrote: > Hi, > > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end. > > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each other. > > Now to clear up a few loose ends: > > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0 start > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be started > manually? Is this a bug or a feature? > > I note the abundance of choices in portage/net-ftp. > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp all > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main" > machine, connected to the web via diallup. > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for micro > develpt. > > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12 > Calculating dependencies ...done! > [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52 kB > > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither make.conf > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know something I > don't? > > -Maxim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com Hi, I had issues on various packages after an emerge update too. I think it was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout (dunno from what time on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14 correctly. Downgrade your portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12 starts working again. Just a thought Frank -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:43:57 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > I note the abundance of choices in portage/net-ftp. > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp all > I need? FTP is more than you need. scp will do the job with only SSH running, or you could export directories over NFS. If you use KDE, use fish://hostname/path in Konqueror to access remote directories. All you need is SSH running on the remote box. -- Neil Bothwick Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
--- Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end.
> >
> > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each other.
> >
> > Now to clear up a few loose ends:
> >
> > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0
> start
> > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be
> started
> > manually? Is this a bug or a feature?
> >
> > I note the abundance of choices in
> portage/net-ftp.
> > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and
> > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp
> all
> > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main"
> > machine, connected to the web via diallup.
> > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for
> micro
> > develpt.
> >
> > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12
> > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52 kB
> >
> > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither
> make.conf
> > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know
> something I
> > don't?
> >
> > -Maxim
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> Hi,
>
> I had issues on various packages after an emerge
> update too. I think it
> was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout
> (dunno from what time
> on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14
> correctly. Downgrade your
> portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12 starts
> working again.
>
> Just a thought
> Frank
Well, I just finished sync'ing portage and immediately
did an emerge -pv ftp and, sure enough, there was the
+ipv6 flag
from ipv6.org:
IPv6 is short for "Internet Protocol Version 6". IPv6
is the "next generation" protocol designed by the IETF
to replace the current version Internet Protocol, IP
Version 4 ("IPv4").
I don't see a date on the page. It was at the top of a
google search list.
"You are using IPv4 from 64.228.98.50" It says, which
is true.
So, is this the bleeding edge? Anyway, I don't think
I'll need ipv4 *or* -6 since this is just for pc-2-pc
use.
But now I'm wondering why the +ipv4 flag wasn't added
to the emerge options for the earlier package...
>
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
Hi, ipv6 is a newer protocol that is meant to substitute the actual
ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. Since the actual
protocol is version 4 there is no need to include a specific flag for
it. And my suggestion is, use "-ipv6" since you probably doesn't have
the hardware for it.
The second point is, will you be using your FTP inside you private
network or will it be available to the rest of the world?? If you
intent to make it available to the rest of the world or just for you
to use via internet, witch means you'll have to leave the FTP port
opened, I really suggest you no to use FTP!! Use SCP (ssh) instead.
Since it requires user authentication via a secure protocol. FTP is
known to be a very big security danger!
--
--
Luiz Carlos Guidolin Aluno de Mestrado
Lab. de Física de Plasmas - TOKAMAK TCABR - IFUSP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (particular) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (USP)
On 3/21/06, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each other.
> > >
> > > Now to clear up a few loose ends:
> > >
> > > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0
> > start
> > > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be
> > started
> > > manually? Is this a bug or a feature?
> > >
> > > I note the abundance of choices in
> > portage/net-ftp.
> > > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back and
> > > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is ftp
> > all
> > > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main"
> > > machine, connected to the web via diallup.
> > > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for
> > micro
> > > develpt.
> > >
> > > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12
> > > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > > [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52 kB
> > >
> > > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither
> > make.conf
> > > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know
> > something I
> > > don't?
> > >
> > > -Maxim
> > >
> > > __
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had issues on various packages after an emerge
> > update too. I think it
> > was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout
> > (dunno from what time
> > on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14
> > correctly. Downgrade your
> > portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12 starts
> > working again.
> >
> > Just a thought
> > Frank
>
> Well, I just finished sync'ing portage and immediately
> did an emerge -pv ftp and, sure enough, there was the
> +ipv6 flag
>
>
> from ipv6.org:
>
> IPv6 is short for "Internet Protocol Version 6". IPv6
> is the "next generation" protocol designed by the IETF
> to replace the current version Internet Protocol, IP
> Version 4 ("IPv4").
>
> I don't see a date on the page. It was at the top of a
> google search list.
>
> "You are using IPv4 from 64.228.98.50" It says, which
> is true.
>
> So, is this the bleeding edge? Anyway, I don't think
> I'll need ipv4 *or* -6 since this is just for pc-2-pc
> use.
>
> But now I'm wondering why the +ipv4 flag wasn't added
> to the emerge options for the earlier package...
>
>
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
Luiz Carlos Guidolin wrote: > ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. No, it doesn't. Alexander Skwar -- If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments. -- Earl Wilson -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
> Luiz Carlos Guidolin wrote: > >> ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. > > No, it doesn't. ipv6 is just a new protocol just different software the network and computer hardware dont have to change! althought i can see why you might say this because some broadband routers dont support ipv6 but this is a firmware limitation and nothing else. Matt. > > Alexander Skwar > -- > If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car > payments. > -- Earl Wilson > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
Matt and Alexander, you're right. Sorry for the wrong info guys. After reading more about it I realized it's just an router issue! Thanks On 3/22/06, Matt Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Luiz Carlos Guidolin wrote: > > > >> ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. > > > > No, it doesn't. > ipv6 is just a new protocol just different software the network and > computer hardware dont have to change! althought i can see why you might > say this because some broadband routers dont support ipv6 but this is a > firmware limitation and nothing else. > > Matt. > > > > Alexander Skwar > > -- > > If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car > > payments. > > -- Earl Wilson -- --- Luiz Carlos Guidolin Aluno de Mestrado Lab. de Física de Plasmas - TOKAMAK TCABR - IFUSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] (particular) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (USP) ... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
Thanks, Luiz. Yeah, just noticed when I did an emerge
of iptraf it said it was going for just one package
but then went and got the ipv6 diff file too.
No, the crossover LAN I'm working on will be strictly
private. My only connection to the Web is via dialup.
But can someone actually squeeze down my serial port
and make it over to the NIC somehow and do mischief? I
hadn't thought about it.
--- Luiz Carlos Guidolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, ipv6 is a newer protocol that is meant to
> substitute the actual
> ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run.
> Since the actual
> protocol is version 4 there is no need to include a
> specific flag for
> it. And my suggestion is, use "-ipv6" since you
> probably doesn't have
> the hardware for it.
>
> The second point is, will you be using your FTP
> inside you private
> network or will it be available to the rest of the
> world?? If you
> intent to make it available to the rest of the world
> or just for you
> to use via internet, witch means you'll have to
> leave the FTP port
> opened, I really suggest you no to use FTP!! Use SCP
> (ssh) instead.
> Since it requires user authentication via a secure
> protocol. FTP is
> known to be a very big security danger!
>
> --
>
--
> Luiz Carlos Guidolin Aluno
> de Mestrado
> Lab. de Física de Plasmas - TOKAMAK TCABR - IFUSP
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (particular) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (USP)
>
>
>
> On 3/21/06, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each
> other.
> > > >
> > > > Now to clear up a few loose ends:
> > > >
> > > > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0
> > > start
> > > > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be
> > > started
> > > > manually? Is this a bug or a feature?
> > > >
> > > > I note the abundance of choices in
> > > portage/net-ftp.
> > > > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back
> and
> > > > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is
> ftp
> > > all
> > > > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main"
> > > > machine, connected to the web via diallup.
> > > > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for
> > > micro
> > > > develpt.
> > > >
> > > > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12
> > > > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > > > [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52
> kB
> > > >
> > > > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither
> > > make.conf
> > > > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know
> > > something I
> > > > don't?
> > > >
> > > > -Maxim
> > > >
> > > >
> __
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had issues on various packages after an emerge
> > > update too. I think it
> > > was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout
> > > (dunno from what time
> > > on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14
> > > correctly. Downgrade your
> > > portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12
> starts
> > > working again.
> > >
> > > Just a thought
> > > Frank
> >
> > Well, I just finished sync'ing portage and
> immediately
> > did an emerge -pv ftp and, sure enough, there was
> the
> > +ipv6 flag
> >
> >
> > from ipv6.org:
> >
> > IPv6 is short for "Internet Protocol Version 6".
> IPv6
> > is the "next generation" protocol designed by the
> IETF
> > to replace the current version Internet Protocol,
> IP
> > Version 4 ("IPv4").
> >
> > I don't see a date on the page. It was at the top
> of a
> > google search list.
> >
> > "You are using IPv4 from 64.228.98.50" It says,
> which
> > is true.
> >
> > So, is this the bleeding edge? Anyway, I don't
> think
> > I'll need ipv4 *or* -6 since this is just for
> pc-2-pc
> > use.
> >
> > But now I'm wondering why the +ipv4 flag wasn't
> added
> > to the emerge options for the earlier package...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping!
Hi Maxim,
as long as you will only be using it internally I think there is no
problem to use the FTP. I think that the probability of someone doing
that is very low. One should be interested in your stuff to spend time
doing that. The fact is, since you will be connected to the Internet
you must set an firewall up. Doing this you will be reducing the
chances of someone even try to access you system. It's much easier to
do that on a unprotected system so why do this in one with a
firewall?!?!
Just be sure your FTP port wont be opened for the outside world!
On 3/22/06, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Luiz. Yeah, just noticed when I did an emerge
> of iptraf it said it was going for just one package
> but then went and got the ipv6 diff file too.
>
> No, the crossover LAN I'm working on will be strictly
> private. My only connection to the Web is via dialup.
>
> But can someone actually squeeze down my serial port
> and make it over to the NIC somehow and do mischief? I
> hadn't thought about it.
>
> --- Luiz Carlos Guidolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, ipv6 is a newer protocol that is meant to
> > substitute the actual
> > ipv4. IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run.
> > Since the actual
> > protocol is version 4 there is no need to include a
> > specific flag for
> > it. And my suggestion is, use "-ipv6" since you
> > probably doesn't have
> > the hardware for it.
> >
> > The second point is, will you be using your FTP
> > inside you private
> > network or will it be available to the rest of the
> > world?? If you
> > intent to make it available to the rest of the world
> > or just for you
> > to use via internet, witch means you'll have to
> > leave the FTP port
> > opened, I really suggest you no to use FTP!! Use SCP
> > (ssh) instead.
> > Since it requires user authentication via a secure
> > protocol. FTP is
> > known to be a very big security danger!
> >
> > --
> >
> --
> > Luiz Carlos Guidolin Aluno
> > de Mestrado
> > Lab. de Física de Plasmas - TOKAMAK TCABR - IFUSP
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (particular) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (USP)
> >
>
> >
> >
> > On 3/21/06, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Franta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 11:43 -0800, maxim wexler
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Oops, lost the thread "turning off dhcp" end.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks to Neil. Both boxen can ping each
> > other.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now to clear up a few loose ends:
> > > > >
> > > > > Why on the fresh(2.6.15) install does net.eth0
> > > > start
> > > > > automatically and the older(2.6.12) have to be
> > > > started
> > > > > manually? Is this a bug or a feature?
> > > > >
> > > > > I note the abundance of choices in
> > > > portage/net-ftp.
> > > > > What do I need? I'll just be moving files back
> > and
> > > > > forth. I don't think security is an issue. Is
> > ftp
> > > > all
> > > > > I need? The 2.6.12(Sempron) will be the "main"
> > > > > machine, connected to the web via diallup.
> > > > > The 2.6.15(K6) I plan to use as a platform for
> > > > micro
> > > > > develpt.
> > > > >
> > > > > emerge -pv ftp on the 2.6.12
> > > > > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > > > > [ebuild N] net-ftp/ftp-0.17-r3 +ssl 52
> > kB
> > > > >
> > > > > but the 2.6.15 adds the +ipv6 flag. Neither
> > > > make.conf
> > > > > mentions it. Does the .15, AMD K6-2, know
> > > > something I
> > > > > don't?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Maxim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > __
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > > protection around
> > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I had issues on various packages after an emerge
> > > > update too. I think it
> > > > was a baselayout issue. Seems the new baselayout
> > > > (dunno from what time
> > > > on) doesn't handle kernels prior to 2.6.14
> > > > correctly. Downgrade your
> > > > portage and see when all for kernel 2.6.12
> > starts
> > > > working again.
> > > >
> > > > Just a thought
> > > > Frank
> > >
> > > Well, I just finished sync'ing portage and
> > immediately
> > > did an emerge -pv ftp and, sure enough, there was
> > the
> > > +ipv6 flag
> > >
> > >
> > > from ipv6.org:
> > >
> > > IPv6 is short for "Internet Protocol Version 6".
> > IPv6
> > > is the "next generation" protocol designed by the
> > IETF
> > > to replace the current version Internet Protocol,
> > IP
> > > Version 4 ("IPv4").
> > >
> > > I don't see a date on the page. It was at the top
> > of a
> > > google search list.
> > >
> > > "You are using IPv4 from 64.228.98.50" It says,
> > which
> > > is true.
> > >
> > > So, is this the bleeding edge? Anyway, I don't
> > think
> > > I'll need ipv4 *o
IPv6 (was: Re: [gentoo-user] ping!)
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:18, "Luiz Carlos Guidolin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] ping!': > IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. Blatantly and completely false. Any hardware that can transport ipv4 traffic can transport ipv6 traffic [1]. Routing tables may be larger (although for the backbone they are supposed to be /smaller/), but they will not /require/ additional hardware. For hardware switching/routing of IPv6 packets (so, this is a layer 3 [or above] switch/router?) well, of course hardware is required, but that doesn't mean you can't do IPv6 in software or firmware. You can join 6-bone today, as long as you have a public (even dynamic) ipv4 IP and a relatively recent kernel. -- "If there's one thing we've established over the years, it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh [1] There are minor exceptions, but only in the case where hardware doesn't accept the larger minimum packet size. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
I'm running Windows XP on VirtualBox, it has a network "NAT" so the IP address it gets: IP: 10.0.2.15 Gateway: 10.0.2.2 DNS: 10.10.0.1 (Linux router) I've tried to access the Windows IP by creating another subnet: ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.2.0 up but it doesn't work, I can not ping the Windows IP: 10.0.2.15 (Windows firewall is OFF) Any suggestions? -- Joseph
Re: IPv6 (was: Re: [gentoo-user] ping!)
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:37:23 -0600 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Tuesday 21 March 2006 18:18, "Luiz Carlos Guidolin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] ping!': > > IPV6 requires a specific hardware to run. > > Blatantly and completely false. Any hardware that can transport ipv4 > traffic can transport ipv6 traffic [1]. Routing tables may be larger > (although for the backbone they are supposed to be /smaller/), but they > will not /require/ additional hardware. For hardware switching/routing of > IPv6 packets (so, this is a layer 3 [or above] switch/router?) well, of > course hardware is required, but that doesn't mean you can't do IPv6 in > software or firmware. > > You can join 6-bone today, as long as you have a public (even dynamic) ipv4 > IP and a relatively recent kernel. In fact when I first started gentoo (and it was a few years ago now) there was a gentoo ipv6 howto, which told you how to get connected to ipv6 via a couple of virtual providers (HeNET?), so I don't think that even a recent kernel was required. That was in 2.4 days. > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Joseph wrote: > I'm running Windows XP on VirtualBox, it has a network "NAT" so the IP > address it gets: > IP: 10.0.2.15 > Gateway: 10.0.2.2 > DNS: 10.10.0.1 (Linux router) > > I've tried to access the Windows IP by creating another subnet: > ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.2.0 up > > but it doesn't work, I can not ping the Windows IP: 10.0.2.15 > (Windows firewall is OFF) > > Any suggestions? You could try using Bridged instead of NAT. Bridged would let you set up the NIC on the VM to the same IP address range as the host using the same NIC as the host. If your host IP is 192.168.1.10 on eth0 You could set Bridged > eth0 on the VM settings panel and then set your net config inside the VMs OS to 192.168.1.X on eth0 -- If we can but prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy. - Thomas Jefferson
Re: [gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
On 03/30/10 14:55, stosss wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Joseph wrote: I'm running Windows XP on VirtualBox, it has a network "NAT" so the IP address it gets: IP: 10.0.2.15 Gateway: 10.0.2.2 DNS: 10.10.0.1 ?(Linux router) I've tried to access the Windows IP by creating another subnet: ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.2.0 up but it doesn't work, I can not ping the Windows IP: ?10.0.2.15 (Windows firewall is OFF) Any suggestions? You could try using Bridged instead of NAT. Bridged would let you set up the NIC on the VM to the same IP address range as the host using the same NIC as the host. If your host IP is 192.168.1.10 on eth0 You could set Bridged > eth0 on the VM settings panel and then set your net config inside the VMs OS to 192.168.1.X on eth0 Yes, I'm aware of it. I've setup iptables + squid so I can filter here they an connect to. If I setup as Bridge, Windows gets the IP from the Router (dhcpd) and will by-pass my filter :-/ My router does not filter outgoing traffic only incoming. I setup on VirtualBox one interface as NAT and one as Bridge and Windows browser selected the one without filer Bridge, so it is bypassing my filter. -- Joseph
Re: [gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 13:08 -0600, Joseph wrote: > On 03/30/10 14:55, stosss wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Joseph wrote: > >> I'm running Windows XP on VirtualBox, it has a network "NAT" so the IP > >> address it gets: > >> IP: 10.0.2.15 > >> Gateway: 10.0.2.2 > >> DNS: 10.10.0.1 ?(Linux router) > >> > >> I've tried to access the Windows IP by creating another subnet: > >> ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.2.0 up > >> > >> but it doesn't work, I can not ping the Windows IP: ?10.0.2.15 > >> (Windows firewall is OFF) > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > >You could try using Bridged instead of NAT. Bridged would let you set > >up the NIC on the VM to the same IP address range as the host using > >the same NIC as the host. > > > >If your host IP is 192.168.1.10 on eth0 > >You could set Bridged > eth0 on the VM settings panel and then set > >your net config inside the VMs OS to 192.168.1.X on eth0 > > Yes, I'm aware of it. > I've setup iptables + squid so I can filter here they an connect to. > If I setup as Bridge, Windows gets the IP from the Router (dhcpd) and will > by-pass my filter :-/ > My router does not filter outgoing traffic only incoming. > > I setup on VirtualBox one interface as NAT and one as Bridge and Windows > browser selected the one without filer Bridge, so it is bypassing my filter. > Check the User Manual for Virtual Box: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.1.6/UserManual.pdf Take a look at section 6.3:"VirtualBox. A virtual machine with NAT enabled acts much like a real computer that connects to the Internet through a router. The “router”, in this case, is the VirtualBox network- ing engine, which maps traffic from and to the virtual machine transparently. The disadvantage of NAT mode is that, much like a private network behind a router, the virtual machine is invisible and unreachable from the outside internet; you cannot run a server this way unless you set up port forwarding (described below)." I would suggest to manually set up your ip address and (or tune dhcp server for VirtualHost). Then should be easy to adjust your settings for iptables+squid.
Re: [gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 13:08 -0600, Joseph wrote: > On 03/30/10 14:55, stosss wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Joseph wrote: > >> I'm running Windows XP on VirtualBox, it has a network "NAT" so the IP > >> address it gets: > >> IP: 10.0.2.15 > >> Gateway: 10.0.2.2 > >> DNS: 10.10.0.1 ?(Linux router) > >> > >> I've tried to access the Windows IP by creating another subnet: > >> ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.2.0 up > >> > >> but it doesn't work, I can not ping the Windows IP: ?10.0.2.15 > >> (Windows firewall is OFF) > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > >You could try using Bridged instead of NAT. Bridged would let you set > >up the NIC on the VM to the same IP address range as the host using > >the same NIC as the host. > > > >If your host IP is 192.168.1.10 on eth0 > >You could set Bridged > eth0 on the VM settings panel and then set > >your net config inside the VMs OS to 192.168.1.X on eth0 > > Yes, I'm aware of it. > I've setup iptables + squid so I can filter here they an connect to. > If I setup as Bridge, Windows gets the IP from the Router (dhcpd) and will > by-pass my filter :-/ > My router does not filter outgoing traffic only incoming. > > I setup on VirtualBox one interface as NAT and one as Bridge and Windows > browser selected the one without filer Bridge, so it is bypassing my filter. > Check the User Manual for Virtual Box: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.1.6/UserManual.pdf Take a look at section 6.3:"VirtualBox. A virtual machine with NAT enabled acts much like a real computer that connects to the Internet through a router. The “router”, in this case, is the VirtualBox network- ing engine, which maps traffic from and to the virtual machine transparently. The disadvantage of NAT mode is that, much like a private network behind a router, the virtual machine is invisible and unreachable from the outside internet; you cannot run a server this way unless you set up port forwarding (described below)." I would suggest to manually set up your ip address and (or tune dhcp server for VirtualHost). Then should be easy to adjust your settings for iptables+squid. If i get you right on you hosting OS you have iptables+squid ?! Then probably you should do the following: 1) Use bridged connection for you VM (WindowsXP). 2) In Windows XP: 2.1 Set up ip address manually at the same network as your host machine. 2.2 Make settings for your browser to use proxy server (ip and port of your linuxbox(hosting machine) with squid). 2.3 If you have forwarding and dns you can also set them at the network setting window. 3) In your LinuxBox (host machine): 2.1. Use iptables to allow traffic between squid and you winXP. 2.2. Setup squid to allow access from winXP. In most cases it should be easy.
Re: [gentoo-user] ping / connect to another subnet
On 03/30/10 23:22, Kostyantyn wrote: Check the User Manual for Virtual Box: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.1.6/UserManual.pdf Take a look at section 6.3:"VirtualBox. A virtual machine with NAT enabled acts much like a real computer that connects to the Internet through a router. The ???router???, in this case, is the VirtualBox network- ing engine, which maps traf???c from and to the virtual machine transparently. The disadvantage of NAT mode is that, much like a private network behind a router, the virtual machine is invisible and unreachable from the outside internet; you cannot run a server this way unless you set up port forwarding (described below)." I would suggest to manually set up your ip address and (or tune dhcp server for VirtualHost). Then should be easy to adjust your settings for iptables+squid. Good suggestion, thank. I think in my case it will be VBoxManage setextradata "Linux Guest" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/Protocol" UDP VBoxManage setextradata "Linux Guest" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/GuestPort" 445 VBoxManage setextradata "Linux Guest" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcnet/0/LUN#0/Config/guestssh/HostPort" 445 since I want to mount samba cifs windows share. I think CIFS on windows is using port 445 but I'm not sure on samba on Linux, will it be 139 or 445? or I just specify port number when mounting it: mount -t cifs -o username=xx,password= //10.0.2.15:455/data -- Joseph
[gentoo-user] Ping ElseCZ (re: Nvidia WAIT; (also KVM GPM passthrough ))
I tried to respond to your NVidia forums post; but couldn't join the forum (apparently they didn't like my gmail address). - FWIW I get that wait (WAIT (E, 0, 0x0887d, 0) ) when I activate the following kernel options: # set "Bus options (PCI etc.)" -> "Support for DMA Remapping Devices" to "*" # set "Bus options (PCI etc.)" -> "Enable DMA Remapping Devices" to "*" # set "Bus options (PCI etc.)" -> "PCI Stub driver" to "*" Activating these options is prescribed by the KVM folks to allow VM access of the GPM; < http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/How_to_assign_devices_with_VT-d_in_KVM> - When I deactivate those options, the NV driver works fine. kernel: linux-2.6.32-gentoo-r6 (and r3) - Perhaps you could post these comments in the NV form. Perhaps you could also advise them that they might get more participation if they were a little more accessible.
