[gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Jorge Almeida 

Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the
no-more-tetex issue?

--
Jorge Almeida
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Daniel Waeber 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Jorge Almeida wrote:
 Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the
 no-more-tetex issue?
 
There was a discussion about it a some days ago in the dev-list:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEfJ5WBbWbHb9PeLsRAmYXAKCFTQ287zXn/nin8nAB5XJLUxq92QCfcs6U
n+Yl9ze4z+EGDjn26CDq/Tc=
=c+c5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin 

On 5/30/06, Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the
no-more-tetex issue?


Have a look on 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615/match=gentoo+dev+tetex

--
Beber
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] post-tetex?

2006-05-30 Thread Jorge Almeida 

On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:


On 5/30/06, Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anyone has any idea about what will be the gentoo way to cope with the
 no-more-tetex issue?


http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615/match=gentoo+dev+tetex


Thanks, Daniel and Bertrand.

Jorge
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list