Re: [gentoo-user] root on newest livedvd ?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:09 AM, James wrote: > > livedvd-amd64-multilib-20140826.iso > > The old livedvd, to get root access it was "sudo su -" > > which does not see to work. Ideas on the new > syntax to get root access. How about "sudo -i" or "sudo -s"?
Re: [gentoo-user] root on newest livedvd ?
* James [140930 09:10]: > livedvd-amd64-multilib-20140826.iso > > > The old livedvd, to get root access it was "sudo su -" > > which does not see to work. Ideas on the new > syntax to get root access. > > > Also, is it straightforward to install a secondary > ebuild package on this latest livedvd that is not > part of the iso? > > > curiously, > James Doesn't just 'su -' (no sudo) work?
Re: [gentoo-user] root on newest livedvd ?
2014-09-30 7:09 GMT-06:00 James : > livedvd-amd64-multilib-20140826.iso > > A quick search gave me: > The old livedvd, to get root access it was "sudo su -" > > which does not see to work. Ideas on the new > syntax to get root access. > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pr/releases/20140826/faq.xml#default > > Also, is it straightforward to install a secondary > ebuild package on this latest livedvd that is not > part of the iso? http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-995118.html your question is answered there > > > curiously, > James > > > >
[gentoo-user] root on newest livedvd ?
livedvd-amd64-multilib-20140826.iso The old livedvd, to get root access it was "sudo su -" which does not see to work. Ideas on the new syntax to get root access. Also, is it straightforward to install a secondary ebuild package on this latest livedvd that is not part of the iso? curiously, James