Re: [gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-05-02 Thread Christoph Gysin
Jason Cooper wrote:
Integrate as in 'emerge --recursive-unmask package-name' or integrate as
in 'app-portage/unmask'?  
in portage, not in app-portage.
Never mind, it's not that I can't live without it. It would merely be a little 
helper for unmasking packages.

Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr * !#:2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-04-29 Thread Christoph Gysin
Adi wrote:
I wish you posted this 2 days ago ... great work! :)
I wish I read this two minutes ago! ;-)
If you rewrite it in python, maybe we could include this feature in 
{portage,gentoolkit} ?

Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr * !#:2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-04-29 Thread Christoph Gysin
Jason Cooper wrote:
Why should he have to rewrite it in python?  eix is C++, and genlop is
Perl.  Admittedly, they are not part of gentoolkit, but everyone uses
them and I don't think anyone thinks any lesser of them. :)
Don't get me wrong, I really like perl. But the idea was to integrate it into 
portage. And portage is python.

Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr * !#:2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-04-29 Thread Jason Cooper
Christoph Gysin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
 Jason Cooper wrote:
 Why should he have to rewrite it in python?  eix is C++, and genlop is
 Perl.  Admittedly, they are not part of gentoolkit, but everyone uses
 them and I don't think anyone thinks any lesser of them. :)
 
 Don't get me wrong, I really like perl. But the idea was to integrate it 
 into portage. And portage is python.

Integrate as in 'emerge --recursive-unmask package-name' or integrate as
in 'app-portage/unmask'?  

cooper.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-04-28 Thread Roy O. Wright
Howdy,
I was wanting to install just kdebase-3.4.0 without unmasking all of 
kde-3.4.0.  The HOWTO
Update KDE 3.3 to KDE 3.4 
(http://www.gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Update_KDE_3.3_to_KDE_3.4)
suggested running emerge kdebase -p, find a package that is blocking, 
then add that package to
/etc/portage/packages.keywords, and repeat until no more packages are 
blocking.  Tedious. 
So here's a perl script to do just that.  It will work for any package.

Usage:  unmask.pl packageName
-- begin: unmask.pl 
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# quick hack to recursively unmask all packages that are blocking the given
# package from emerging.
# usage: unmask.pl packageName
print unmasking:=$ARGV[0]\n;
doit;
exit(0);
# doit()
sub doit {
   local $flag = 1;
   local $package = $ARGV[0];
   while($flag) {
   $flag = 0;
   open my $fh, emerge $package -p| || die could not open: 
emerge $package -p;
   while($fh) {
   if(/^\-\s+(.*)\-[\d\.]+\s+\(masked 
by\:\s+(\~\S+)\s+keyword\)/) {
   unmask($1, $2);
   $flag = 1;
   last;
   }
   }
   close($fh);
   }
}

# unmask the file by adding it to /etc/portage/package.keywords
sub unmask
{
   local($name, $arch) = @_;
   print unmasking: $name\n;
   open my $fh, /etc/portage/package.keywords || die can't open 
package.keywords: $!;
   print $fh $name $arch\n;
   close $fh;
}
-- end: unmask.pl 

Have fun,
Roy
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Re: [gentoo-user] script to recursively unmask a package

2005-04-28 Thread Jason Cooper
Roy O. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
 Howdy,
 
 I was wanting to install just kdebase-3.4.0 without unmasking all of 
 kde-3.4.0.  The HOWTO
 Update KDE 3.3 to KDE 3.4 
 (http://www.gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Update_KDE_3.3_to_KDE_3.4)
 suggested running emerge kdebase -p, find a package that is blocking, 
 then add that package to
 /etc/portage/packages.keywords, and repeat until no more packages are 
 blocking.  Tedious. 
 So here's a perl script to do just that.  It will work for any package.
 
 Usage:  unmask.pl packageName
 
 -- begin: unmask.pl 
[snip]
 -- end: unmask.pl 

No, no, no... You got it all wrong.  We can't have a portage utility
with a name that makes sense.  You need to rename it to something like
'gunmk' (Gentoo UNMasK).  :-)

Seriously, though.  Nice script.  

cooper.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list